3 research outputs found

    Perceptual load and enumeration: Distractor interference depends on subitizing capacity

    Get PDF
    Attention is limited, both in processing capacity (leading to phenomena of “inattentional blindness”) and in the capacity for selective focus (leading to distraction). Load theory (e.g., Lavie, 1995) accounts for both limitations by proposing that perceptual processing has limited capacity but proceeds automatically and in parallel on all stimuli within capacity. Here we tested these claims by applying load theory to the phenomenon of “subitizing”: the parallel detection and individuation of a limited number of items, established in enumeration research. We predicted that distractor interference will be found within but not beyond a person’s subitizing capacity (measured as the transition from parallel to serial slope). Participants reported the number of target shapes from brief displays while ignoring irrelevant cartoon-image distractors. As predicted, distractor cost on enumeration performance was found within subitizing capacity and eliminated in larger set sizes. Moreover, individual differences results demonstrated that distractor effects depended on an individual’s capacity (i.e., their serial-to-parallel transition point), rather than on set size per se. These results provide new evidence for the load theory hypotheses that perceptual processing is automatic and parallel within its limited capacity, while extending it to account for selective attention during enumeratio

    Individual differences in parietal and frontal cortex structure predict dissociable capacities for perception and cognitive control

    Get PDF
    Capacity limits in perception can lead to failures of awareness in situations that overload capacity, resulting in various phenomena of 'inattentional blindness'. In contrast, capacity limits in cognitive control over attention by working memory lead to increased processing of irrelevant distractors (reduced inattentional blindness). Here, using Voxel-Based Morphometry combined with Principal Components Analysis, we establish distinct brain-structural correlates of perceptual capacity, dissociable from those of cognitive control. Perceptual capacity was measured as the principal component accounting for variance across tasks of multiple object tracking, change blindness and rapid visual enumeration (i.e. 'subitizing'). Cognitive control capacity was measured as the principal component underlying performance of three different complex working memory span tasks (involving spatial, semantic and numerical domains). Volumetric differences in the right Inferior Parietal Lobule (IPL) were predictive of individual differences in perceptual capacity, while volumetric differences in left Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG) (as well as lateral frontal and posterior cingulate cortex in a non-parametric analysis) were predictive of individual differences in cognitive control capacity. IPL remained a significant predictor of perceptual capacity when controlling for variance accounted for by cognitive control capacity and vice versa for the neural correlates of cognitive control. These results suggest that perceptual and cognitive control capacities represent dissociable and lasting, trait-like attributes which can be predicted from distinct signatures in regional grey matter
    corecore