27 research outputs found
Determination of composite slab strength using a new elemental test method
Composite slabs utilizing cold-formed profiled steel decks are commonly used for floor systems in steel framed buildings. The behavior and strength of composite slabs are normally controlled by the horizontal shear bond between the steel deck and the concrete. The strength of the horizontal shear bond depends on many factors and it is not possible to provide representative design values that can be applied to all slab conditions a priori. Thus, present design standards require that the design parameters be obtained from full-size bending tests, which are typically one or two deck panels wide and a single span. However, because these full-size tests can be expensive and time consuming, smaller size specimens, referred to as elemental tests, are desirable and have been the subject of a great deal of research. Details for a new elemental test method for composite slab specimens under bending are presented. Test results consisting of maximum applied load, end slips, and failure modes are presented and compared with the results of full-size specimens with similar end details, spans, etc. It is shown that the performance of the elemental test developed in this study is in good agreement with the performance of the full-size specimens. Application of test data to current design specifications is also presented
Web Crippling Strength of Multi-web Steel Deck Sections Subjected to End One Flange Loading
Cold-formed steel deck profiles are extensively used in building construction due to their versatility and economical considerations. Web crippling is one of the failure modes for these multi-web profiles. The 1996-AISI Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members provisions for web crippling are believed to be conservative for multi-web deck sections. They are based on unfastened specimens and are limited to the use of decks with certain geometric parameters. The unified web crippling equation of the North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members (AISI 2001) is also limited to certain geometric parameters. Although it has new web crippling coefficients for different load cases and different end conditions, in the End One Flange Loading case, coefficients for the unfastened configuration were used as a conservative solution for the fastened case because there was no directly applicable test data available in the literature. This paper presents the results of an experimental study on web crippling strength of multiple-web cold-formed steel deck sections subjected to End One Flange (EOF) loading. A total of 78 tests were conducted on deck sections at Virginia Tech. Test specimens lying inside and outside of certain geometric parameters of the specifications were tested with both unrestrained and restrained end conditions. Test specimens lying inside the specification parameters have revealed conservative results in the prediction of web crippling strength using both the AISI(1996) and the draft of the North American Specification (AISI 2001.
Behavior of Complex Hat Shapes Used As Truss Chord Members
Cold-formed steel roof truss systems that use complex hat shape members for both top and bottom chord elements are a growing trend in the North America steel framing industry. When designing cold-formed steel sections, a structural engineer typically tries to improve the local buckling behavior of the coldformed steel elements. The complex hat shape has proven to limit the negative influence of local buckling. However, a distortional buckling mode can be the control mode of failure in the design for the chord member with an intermediate un-braced length. The chord member may be subjected to both bending and compressive load because of the continuity of the top and bottom chord members. These members are not typically braced between each panel point in a truss. Numerical analyses using finite strip and finite element procedures were developed to compare with experimental results. A parametric study on geometric imperfection was also conducted to investigate the factors that affect the ultimate strength behavior of a particular complex hat shape. Better understanding of the flexural behavior of these complex hat shapes is necessary to obtain efficient, safe designs of a truss system. The results of these analyses will be presented in the paper
Further Studies of Composite Slab Strength
The results to date of a research program focusing on the strength of composite slabs are described. Full-scale experimental slab tests are compared to strengths calculated using the Steel Deck Institute Composite Deck Design Handbook. Based on the comparisons, recommendations are made for modifications to the calculation procedures
Strength and Stiffness Calculation Procedures for Composite Slabs
Two procedures for calculating the strength and stiffness of composite slabs based on a partial interaction model are introduced. The procedures rely on elemental test results for interfacial and end-anchorage behavior, and thus offer an alternate solution to the m and k method that relies heavily on full scale slab tests. Strength calculations made using the new procedures along with calculations from the Steel Deck Institute procedure are compared to a series of full size composite slab test results
Strength of arc-spot welds made in single and multiple steel sheets
The objective of this research was to establish a relationship between arc spot weld shear strength and the arc time used to form the weld. Lap shear tests were performed on both 3/4 in. and 5/8 in. nominal diameter welds. Each weld was formed in one-, two-, or four-layers of sheet steel ranging from 22 gauge (0.028 in.) to 16 gauge (.057 in.). Three distinct time series were tested for each unique weld size, thickness of sheet steel and layer configuration. The first of these series were the full-time welds. The two remaining series, 2/3-time and 1/3-time welds, had arc times equal to 2/3 and 1/3 of the average full-time weld arc time, respectively. Both weld shear strength tests and weld sectioning were performed for each series of weld. Strength tests were performed on a minimum of three specimens from every weld series. If the strength of any specimen deviated by over ten percent from the mean strength, an additional specimen was tested, helping to better understand the true behavior of the weld. Comparisons were made between the strengths of full-time, 2/3- time and 1/3-time welds. Comparisons were also made between the observed strength of each weld and the strengths calculated using the 2001 AISI Specification. Each sectioning test involved measuring and documenting the visual diameter, average diameter and effective diameter of the weld. Weld penetrations were also documented as sufficient or insufficient and any porosity was noted. A single sectioning test was performed for each full-time series, while three were performed for every 2/3- time and 1/3-time series. The data taken from the strength tests and the sectioning samples proved that welds formed using reduced arc times were considerably smaller and weaker than fulltime welds. The tests also proved that proper penetration is not dependent on the arc time, but is instead a function of the welding current and sheet steel thickness
Section properties for cellular decks subjected to negative bending
Cellular decks are formed by attaching cold-formed āhat-shapedā deck sections on top of cold-formed steel sheets. The attachment is typically made using resistance spot welds spaced at a specific interval. The void left underneath the deck flutes and above the steel sheet provides a convenient means for the distribution of wiring and data cables throughout building systems. The section properties of cellular decks subjected to positive bending can be determined using the provisions of Chapter B of the 2001 AISI Specification (AISI, 2001). However, the provisions of Chapter B do not apply to cellular decks subjected to negative bending unless a specific weld spacing requirement is met. This requirement, set by Section D1.2 Spacing of Connections in Compression Elements (AISI, 2001), limits weld spacing so as to completely prevent column-like buckling between welds and provide adequate resistance to horizontal shear forces. Using section D1.2 limits weld spacing to a range of 1 in. to 2 in. for most cellular decks. It is standard industry practice to space cellular deck welds at 4 in. to 8 in. on center, exceeding the limits of Section D1.2. If the spacing limits of Section D1.2 are exceeded, the 2001 AISI Specification requires that the steel sheet be neglected when determining the section properties of cellular deck in negative bending. This is done because column-like buckling is likely to occur in the sheet when it is subjected to compression forces. Although the 2001 AISI Specification has provisions in place to account for the effects of local buckling, it has no provisions in place to account for the post column-like buckling strength of the steel sheet. However, a procedure for determining the post-buckling strength of cellular decks was developed by Luttrell and Balaji (1992), and is based on the results of 82 negative bending tests performed on six cellular deck profiles. The procedure developed by Luttrell and Balaji (1992) utilizes a dimensional reduction factor, Ļm, which is used to determine the effective width of the steel sheet when column-like buckling is an issue. The factors having the greatest influence on Ļm include steel sheet thickness, steel sheet yield strength, weld spacing, and the depth of the deck. Although the method correlated well with the 82 bending tests performed, a ballot containing his method was not passed by AISI. The principal reason for its rejection was 2 that the reduction factor, Ļm, was dimensional, which violates an AISI directive that all equations be non-dimensional so they apply to both US Standard and SI units. The primary objective of this research was to modify the method developed by Luttrell and Balaji such that the dimensional reduction factor is non-dimensional. Using Luttrell\u27s method, section properties for 49 of the 82 cellular decks tested in negative bending were determined. Section properties were not determined for the remaining 33 ECP266 and EPC3 cellular decks due to a lack of information with regard to the deck dimensions. However, a dimensionless reduction factor was developed based on the section properties of the EP-type cellular deck. The equation used to predict the reduction factor was optimized so as to reduce the error between observed and theoretical bending strength to a minimum