33 research outputs found

    Difference in Postoperative Outcomes and Perioperative Resource Utilization Between General Surgeons and Pediatric Surgeons: A Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    Background: Both general surgeons (GS) and pediatric surgeons (PS) perform a high volume of appendectomies in pediatric patients, but there is a paucity of data on these outcomes based on surgeon training. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes and perioperative resource utilization for pediatric appendectomies.Methods: We searched PubMed to identify articles examining the association between surgeon specialization and outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing appendectomies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer, with another reviewer to resolve discrepancies.Results: We identified 4799 articles, with 98.4% (4724/2799) concordance after initial review. Following resolution of discrepancies, 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Of the studies that reported each outcome, GS and PS demonstrated similar rates of readmission within 30 days (pooled RR 1.61 95% CI 0.66, 2.55) wound infections (pooled RR 1.07, 95% CI .55, 1.60), use of laparoscopic surgery (pooled RR 1.87, 95% CI .21, 3.53), postoperative complications (pooled RR 1.40, 95% CI .83, 1.97), use of preoperative imaging (pooled RR .98,95% CI .90, 1.05), and intra-abdominal abscesses (pooled RR .80, 95% CI .03, 1.58). Patients treated by GS did have a significantly higher risk of negative appendectomies (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10, 1.84) when compared to PS.Discussion: This is the first meta-analysis to compare outcomes for pediatric appendectomies performed by GS compared to PS. Patient outcomes and resource utilization were similar among PS and GS, except for negative appendectomies were significantly more likely with GS

    Prototype spent-fuel canister design, analysis, and test

    Get PDF
    Sandia National Laboratories was asked by the US Energy Research and Development Administration (now US Department of Energy) to design the spent fuel shipping cask system for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP). As a part of this task, a canister which holds liquid sodium and the spent fuel assembly was designed, analyzed, and tested. The canister body survived the regulatory Type-B 9.1-m (30-ft) drop test with no apparent leakage. However, the commercially available metal seal used in this design leaked after the tests. This report describes the design approach, analysis, and prototype canister testing. Recommended work for completing the design, when funding is available, is included

    Meeting the needs of staff

    No full text

    pSK41/pGO1-family conjugative plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus encode a cryptic repressor of replication

    No full text
    The majority of large multiresistance plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus utilise a RepA_N-type replication initiation protein, the expression of which is regulated by a small antisense RNA (RNAI) that overlaps the rep mRNA leader. The pSK41/pGO1-family of conjugative plasmids additionally possess a small (86 codon) divergently transcribed ORF (orf86) located upstream of the rep locus. The product of pSK41 orf86 was predicted to have a helix-turn-helix motif suggestive of a likely function in transcriptional repression. In this study, we investigated the effect of Orf86 on transcription of thirteen pSK41 backbone promoters. We found that Orf86 only repressed transcription from the rep promoter, and hence now redesignate the product as Cop. Over-expression of Cop in trans reduced the copy number of pSK41 mini-replicons, both in the presence and absence of rnaI. in vitro protein-DNA binding experiments with purified 6 x His-Cop demonstrated specific DNA binding, adjacent to, and partially overlapping the −35 hexamer of the rep promoter. The crystal structure of Cop revealed a dimeric structure similar to other known transcriptional regulators. Cop mRNA was found to result from “read-through” transcription from the strong RNAI promoter that escapes the rnaI terminator. Thus, PrnaI is responsible for transcription of two distinct negative regulators of plasmid copy number; the antisense RNAI that primarily represses Rep translation, and Cop protein that can repress rep transcription. Deletion of cop in a native plasmid did not appear to impact copy number, indicating a cryptic auxiliary role
    corecore