The association and potential pathways between common mental disorders and oral health among Finnish adults

There are behavioural and physiological alterations associated with depression and anxiety which may affect oral health. Nonetheless, there is limited research on this topic and results are inconclusive. This study explored the association of depression and anxiety with clinical and perceived oral health and possible pathways underlying these associations. The first hypothesis was that depression and anxiety negatively affected clinical oral health via oral health-related behaviours, medication use and physiological response. The second was that depression and anxiety negatively affected perceived oral health via clinical oral health and use of medications. This is a secondary analysis of data on adults who participated in the nationally representative Finnish Health 2000 survey. Depression and anxiety were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, respectively. The association of each mental disorder with clinical (dental caries, periodontal disease and tooth loss) and perceived oral health were tested in regression models adjusted for confounders and potential mediators. Findings indicated that depression and anxiety were associated with the number of decayed teeth. These associations were not entirely explained by oral health-related behaviours and medication use. The associations of depression with numbers of teeth and filled teeth were fully explained by those mediators. Perceived oral health was strongly related with depression and anxiety. The association between anxiety and perceived oral health was completely explained by clinical oral health status and use of anxiolytic medication, whereas the association between depression and perceived oral health was attenuated, but remained significant. In conclusion, there were significant associations between depression and anxiety with some clinical measures of oral health and with perceived oral health. However, these associations were largely explained by socio-demographic factors, and to a lesser extent by the mediators assessed

Education mediates the relationship of parental socioeconomic status with subjective adult oral health.

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows that both socioeconomic status (SES) during childhood and education are associated with adult oral health. However, whether the range of opportunities families have regarding their children's education mediate the effect of childhood disadvantage on oral health later in life remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mediating role of education in the association between parental SES and subjective oral health status in middle adulthood. METHODS: Data from 6703 members of the British Cohort Study 1970 were analyzed. Parental SES was measured using the 7-class National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) at age 10 years. Five measures of education (type of high school, highest qualification, age left full-time education, status of institution and field of study) were obtained from ages 16 and 42 years. Subjective oral health was measured with a single global item at age 46 years. Causal mediation analysis was performed, using a weighting-based approach, to evaluate how much of the effect of parental SES on subjective oral health was mediated by the measures of education separately and jointly. RESULTS: Overall, 23.6% of individuals reported poor oral health. Parental SES was associated with every measure of education, and they were also associated with subjective oral health in regression models adjusted for confounders. The effect of parental SES on subjective oral health was partially mediated by each measure of education, with a proportion mediated of 53.2% for the institution status, 46.5% for the field of study, 42.8% for the school type, 38.9% for the highest qualification earned and 38.4% for the age when full-time education was discontinued. The proportion of the effect of parental SES on subjective oral health jointly mediated by all measures of education was 81.1%. CONCLUSION: This study found a substantial mediating role of education in the association between parental SES and subjective oral health in middle adulthood

The intersections of socioeconomic position, gender, race/ethnicity and nationality in relation to oral conditions among American adults.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate how gender, socioeconomic position (SEP), race/ethnicity and nationality intersect to structure social inequalities in adult oral health among American adults. METHODS: Data from adults aged 20 years or over who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2018 were analysed. The outcomes were poor self-rated oral health and edentulism among all adults (n = 24 541 and 21 446 participants, respectively) and untreated caries and periodontitis among dentate adults (n = 16 483 and 9829 participants, respectively). A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) was conducted for each outcome, by nesting individuals within 48 intersectional strata defined as combinations of gender, SEP, race/ethnicity and nationality. Intersectional measures included the variance partition coefficient (VPC), the proportional change in variance (PCV) and predicted excess probability due to interaction. RESULTS: Substantial social inequalities in the prevalence of oral conditions among adults were found, which were characterized by high between-stratum heterogeneity and outcome specificity. The VPCs of the simple intersectional model showed that 9.4%-12.7% of the total variance in the presentation of oral conditions was attributed to between-stratum differences. In addition, the PCVs from the simple intersectional model to the intersectional interaction model showed that 84.1%-97.1% of the stratum-level variance in the presentation of oral conditions was attributed to the additive effects of gender, SEP, race/ethnicity and nationality. The point estimates of the predictions for some intersectional strata were suggestive of an intersectional interaction effect. However, the 95% credible intervals were very wide and the estimations inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis highlights the value of the intersectionality framework to understand heterogeneity in social inequalities in oral health. These inequalities were mainly due to the additive effect of the social identities defining the intersectional strata, with no evidence of interaction effects

Family Income and Tooth Decay in US Children:Does the Association Change with Age?

This study explored whether the association of family income with tooth decay changes with age among children in the United States. A second objective was to explore the role of access to dental health care services in explaining the interrelationships between family income, child age and tooth decay. Data from 7,491 2- to 15-year-old children who participated in the 1999–2004 National and Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed. The association of family income with the prevalence of tooth decay in primary, permanent and primary or permanent teeth was first estimated in logistic regression models with all children, and then, separately in four age groups that reflect the development of the dentition (2–5, 6–8, 9–11 and 12–15 years, respectively). Findings showed that the income gradient in tooth decay attenuated significantly in 9- to 11-year-olds only to re-emerge in 12- to 15-year-olds. The age profile of the income gradient in tooth decay was not accounted for by a diverse set of family and child characteristics. This is the first study providing some evidence for age variations in the income gradient in tooth decay among children in the United States.</jats:p