37 research outputs found

    Identifying damage on a bridge using rotation-based Bridge Weigh-In-Motion

    Get PDF
    Funder: University of CambridgeAbstractBridge Weigh-in-Motion (B-WIM) systems use the bridge response under a traversing vehicle to estimate its axle weights. The information obtained from B-WIM systems has been used for a wide range of applications such as pre-selection for weight enforcement, traffic management/planning and for bridge and pavement design. However, it is less often used for bridge condition assessment purposes which is the main focus of this study. This paper presents a bridge damage detection concept using information provided by B-WIM systems. However, conventional B-WIM systems use strain measurements which are not sensitive to local damage. In this paper the authors present a B-WIM formulation that uses rotation measurements obtained at the bridge supports. There is a linear relationship between support rotation and axle weight and, unlike strain, rotation is sensitive to damage anywhere in the bridge. Initially, the sensitivity of rotation to damage is investigated using a hypothetical simply supported bridge model. Having seen that rotation is damage-sensitive, the influence of bridge damage on weight predictions is analysed. It is shown that if damage occurs, a rotation-based B-WIM system will continuously overestimate the weight of traversing vehicles. Finally, the statistical repeatability of ambient traffic is studied using real traffic data obtained from a Weigh-in-Motion site in the U.S. under the Federal Highway Administration’s Long-Term Pavement Performance programme and a damage indicator is proposed as the change in the mean weights of ambient traffic data. To test the robustness of the proposed damage detection methodology numerical analysis are carried out on a simply supported bridge model and results are presented within the scope of this study.</jats:p

    Bridge damage detection using rotation measurements – experimental validation

    Get PDF
    This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record This paper presents a novel bridge condition assessment methodology using direct rotation measurements. Initially, numerical analyses are carried out to develop the theoretical basis of the proposed bridge damage detection methodology. As a result of this study the difference in rotation influence lines obtained for healthy and damaged bridge states is proposed as a damage indicator. The sensitivity of rotation to damage and the effect of sensor locations on sensor sensitivities are investigated. Subsequently, extensive laboratory experiments are conducted on a 5.4 m long simply supported bridge structure in an effort to validate the results from the numerical analyses. The test structure is instrumented with rotation sensors and axle detectors and loaded with a four-axle moving vehicle. In this study, rotations are measured using high grade uniaxial accelerometers. The procedure of measuring rotations using accelerometers is explained within the scope of this study. To test the robustness of the proposed bridge condition assessment methodology, a wide range of single and multiple damage scenarios is investigated and the results from this study show that the proposed methodology can successfully identify damage on a bridge. For the model considered, damage as low as 7% change in stiffness over an extent of 2.5% bridge span is shown to be detectable.European Union Horizon 202

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in the Earth system

    Full text link

    Editorial

    No full text

    Cytogenetic and Clinical Correlates in Aml Patients with Abnormalities of Chromosome-16

    No full text
    Abnormalities of chromosome 16 in AML include del(16q), inv(16) and t(16;16). These three groups have been categorized together and have been associated with high complete remission (CR) and survival rates following Ara-C-based chemotherapy. We have reviewed the 63 AML or MDS patients with an abnormality of chromosome 16 treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) over the past 18 years. Marked differences in survival and remission duration (RD) were noted between the inv(16) or t(16;16) patients and those with del(16q), whose outcome was no better than other M4 AML or MDS patients treated during the same period. Other differences characterizing del(16q) included a lack of CNS relapses, lower incidences of eosinophilia and M4 FAB subtype. Half the inv(16) patients had additional karyotypic abnormalities. The overall survival and remission duration for those patients were no different from those for patients with inv(16) alone, although the probability of remaining in first CR at 2 years was higher in the inv(16) alone group. There was no difference in overall survival for the 45 patients who received HDAC vs those who did not. The incidence of CNS relapse was, however, markedly reduced for the HDAC patients. Eosinophilia did not correlate with improved survival. We conclude that del(16q) confers a different prognosis from inv(16) and t(16;16) and for the purposes of prognostication or treatment recommendations should no longer be categorized with them. Additional karyotypic changes however, which accompany inv(16) in 50% of cases do not influence the overall outcome compared to patients with inv(16) alone
    corecore