Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Despite recent discoveries of new molecular targets and pathways, the search for an effective therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) continues. A newly emerged field, radiogenomics, links gene expression profiles with MRI phenotypes. MRI-FLAIR is a noninvasive diagnostic modality and was previously found to correlate with cellular invasion in GBM. Thus, our radiogenomic screen has the potential to reveal novel molecular determinants of invasion. Here, we present the first comprehensive radiogenomic analysis using quantitative MRI volumetrics and large-scale gene- and microRNA expression profiling in GBM.Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), discovery and validation sets with gene, microRNA, and quantitative MR-imaging data were created. Top concordant genes and microRNAs correlated with high FLAIR volumes from both sets were further characterized by Kaplan Meier survival statistics, microRNA-gene correlation analyses, and GBM molecular subtype-specific distribution.The top upregulated gene in both the discovery (4 fold) and validation (11 fold) sets was PERIOSTIN (POSTN). The top downregulated microRNA in both sets was miR-219, which is predicted to bind to POSTN. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that above median expression of POSTN resulted in significantly decreased survival and shorter time to disease progression (P<0.001). High POSTN and low miR-219 expression were significantly associated with the mesenchymal GBM subtype (P<0.0001).Here, we propose a novel diagnostic method to screen for molecular cancer subtypes and genomic correlates of cellular invasion. Our findings also have potential therapeutic significance since successful molecular inhibition of invasion will improve therapy and patient survival in GBM

Antiangiogenic agents in the treatment of recurrent or newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Analysis of single-agent and combined modality approaches

Surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma can prolong survival, but it is not curative. For patients with disease progression after frontline therapy, there is no standard of care, although further surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy may be used. Antiangiogenic therapies may be appropriate for treating glioblastomas because angiogenesis is critical to tumor growth. In a large, noncomparative phase II trial, bevacizumab was evaluated alone and with irinotecan in patients with recurrent glioblastoma; combination treatment was associated with an estimated 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 50.3%, a median overall survival of 8.9 months, and a response rate of 37.8%. Single-agent bevacizumab also exceeded the predetermined threshold of activity for salvage chemotherapy (6-month PFS rate, 15%), achieving a 6-month PFS rate of 42.6% (p < 0.0001). On the basis of these results and those from another phase II trial, the US Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval of single-agent bevacizumab for the treatment of glioblastoma that has progressed following prior therapy. Potential antiangiogenic agents-such as cilengitide and XL184-also show evidence of single-agent activity in recurrent glioblastoma. Moreover, the use of antiangiogenic agents with radiation at disease progression may improve the therapeutic ratio of single-modality approaches. Overall, these agents appear to be well tolerated, with adverse event profiles similar to those reported in studies of other solid tumors. Further research is needed to determine the role of antiangiogenic therapy in frontline treatment and to identify the optimal schedule and partnering agents for use in combination therapy

Comparison of ADC metrics and their association with outcome for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma being treated with radiation therapy, temozolomide, erlotinib and bevacizumab

To evaluate metrics that describe changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and to examine their association with clinical outcome for patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were participating in a Phase II clinical trial of treatment with radiation (RT), temozolomide, erlatonib and bevacizumab. Thirty six patients were imaged after surgery but prior to therapy and at regular follow-up time points. The following ADC metrics were evaluated: (1) histogram percentiles within the T2-hyperintense lesion (T2L) at serial follow-ups; (2) parameters obtained by fitting a two-mixture normal distribution to the histogram within the contrast-enhancing lesion (CEL) at baseline; (3) parameters obtained using both traditional and graded functional diffusion maps within the CEL and T2L. Cox Proportional Hazards models were employed to assess the association of the ADC parameters with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A lower ADC percentile value within the T2L at early follow-up time points was associated with worse outcome. Of particular interest is that, even when adjusting for clinical prognostic factors, the ADC(10%) within the T2L at 2 months was strongly associated with OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.007). fDM metrics showed an association with OS and PFS within the CEL when considered by univariate analysis, but not in the T2L. Our study emphasizes the value of ADC metrics obtained from the T2L at the post-RT time point as non-invasive biomarkers for assessing residual tumor in patients with newly diagnosed GBM being treated with combination therapy that includes the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab

Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination with Irinotecan in Recurrent WHO Grade II and Grade III Gliomas

Background: The repertoire of salvage regimens for patients with WHO grade II and III gliomas recurring or progressing after surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy is limited. Based on promising response and progression-free survival (PFS) data in recurrent glioblastoma, the use of bevacizumab (BEV) has been extended to recurrent grade II/III gliomas. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of BEV alone or combined with irinotecan in 39 patients with recurrent grade II/III gliomas. Results: Both BEV monotherapy and its combination with irinotecan were well tolerated. Response rates were 26% as monotherapy and 33% in combination using Macdonald and RANO criteria. The median PFS was 4.2 months and the PFS rate at 6 months 29% for BEV alone, and 4.7 months and 42% for the combination. The median overall survival was 14.8 months for BEV monotherapy and 8.1 months for the combination. Outcome after failure of BEV was better when patients continued BEV beyond progression. Conclusion: BEV has limited activity in recurrent grade II/III gliomas. The additional value of irinotecan remains questionable. Prospective studies with BEV-free control groups are required to better define the role of BEV among the limited options in patients with recurrent grade II/III gliomas

Corticosteroid and antiviral therapy for Bell's palsy: A network meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous meta-analyses of treatments for Bell's palsy are still inconclusive due to different comparators, insufficient data, and lack of power. We therefore conducted a network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect comparisons for assessing efficacy of steroids and antiviral treatment (AVT) at 3 and 6 months.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched Medline and EMBASE until September 2010 using PubMed and Elsviere search engines. A network meta-analysis was performed to assess disease recovery using a mixed effects hierarchical model. Goodness of fit of the model was assessed, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six studies (total n = 1805)were eligible and contributed to the network meta-analysis. The pooled ORs for resolution at 3 months were 1.24 (95% CI: 0.79 - 1.94) for Acyclovir plus Prednisolone and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.73 - 1.42) for Valacyclovir plus Prednisolone, versus Prednisolone alone. Either Acyclovir or Valacyclovir singly had significantly lower efficacy than Prednisolone alone, i.e., ORs were 0·44 (95% CI: 0·28 - 0·68) and 0·60 (95% CI: 0·42 - 0·87), respectively. Neither of the antiviral agents was significantly different compared with placebo, with a pooled OR of 1·25 (95% CI: 0·78 - 1·98) for Acyclovir and 0·91 (95% CI: 0·63 - 1·31) for Valacyclovir. Overall, Prednisolone-based treatment increased the chance of recovery 2-fold (95% CI: 1·55 - 2·42) compared to non-Prednisolone-based treatment. To gain 1 extra recovery, 6 and 26 patients need to be treated with Acyclovir and prednisolone compared to placebo and prednisolone alone, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our evidence suggests that the current practice of treating Bell's palsy with AVT plus corticosteroid may lead to slightly higher recovery rates compared to treating with prednisone alone but this does not quite reach statistical significance; prednisone remains the best evidence-based treatment.</p