Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Anti-Müllerian Hormone per Oocyte in Predicting in vitro Fertilization Pregnancy in High Responders: A Cohort Study

Background: Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) are utilized to differentiate between good and poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Their respective roles in defining functional ovarian reserve remain, however, to be elucidated. To better understand those we investigated AMH and FSH per oocyte retrieved (AMHo and FSHo). Methodology/Principal Findings: Three-hundred and ninety-six women, undergoing first in vitro fertilization cycles, were retrospectively evaluated. Women with oocyte yields.75 th percentile for their age group were identified as high responders. In a series of logistic regression analyses, AMHo and FSHo levels were then evaluated as predictive factors for pregnancy potential in high responders. Patients presented with a mean age of 38.065.0 years, mean baseline FSH of 11.868.7 mIU/mL and mean AMH of 1.662.1 ng/mL. Those 88 women, who qualified as high responders, showed mean FSH of 9.766.5 mIU/mL, AMH of 3.163.1 ng/mL and oocyte yields of 15.867.1. Baseline FSH and AMH did not predict pregnancy in high responders. However, a statistically significant association between FSHo and pregnancy was observed in high responders, both after univariate regression (p = 0.02) and when adjusted for age, percentage of usable embryos, and number of embryos transferred (p = 0.03). Rate of useable embryos also significantly affected pregnancy outcome independently of FSHo (p = 0.01). AMHo was also associated with clinical pregnancy chances in high responders (p = 0.03

Anti-Müllerian hormone levels as a predictor of the pregnancy rate in women of advanced reproductive age

PURPOSE: To investigate whether serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), or antral follicle count (AFC) are predictive for clinical pregnancy in women who underwent IVF cycles at the age of 35 and older METHODS: A total of 240 consecutive women who underwent IVF cycles at the age of 35 and older were enrolled in this crsoss- sectional study. Pregnant and nonpregnant women were compared. RESULTS: The median AMH level of pregnant women was higher than non-pregnant women [3.20 (0.63–9.60) vs 1.15 (0.01–14.90) ng/ml, p < 0.001]. On logistic regression analysis, AMH was an independent predictor of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR 1.353; 95 % CI 1.141–1.605; P < 0.001). After controlling for the other independent variables (the number of retrieved oocytes, AFC and age), the significant association between AMH and clinical pregnancy rate remained strong (OR 1.677; 95 % CI 1.216–2.311; p = 0.002) on multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: AMH is an effective measure of quantitative ovarian reserve and it can predict ovarian response to controlled stimulation for advanced age women. The CPR tends to increase as AMH increases