Effects of Thyroid Dysfunction on Lipid Profile

Thyroid dysfunction has a great impact on lipids as well as a number of other cardiovascular risk factors. Hypothyroidism is relatively common and is associated with an unfavorable effect on lipids. Substitution therapy is beneficial for patients with overt hypothyroidism, improving lipid profile. However, whether subclinical hypothyroidism should be treated or not is a matter of debate. On the other hand, hyperthyroidism can be associated with acquired hypocholesterolemia or unexplained improvement of lipid profile. Overall, thyroid dysfunction should be taken into account when evaluating and treating dyslipidemic patients

A Horse, a Jockey, and a Therapeutic Dilemma: Choosing the Best Option for a Patient with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease

Current guidelines for the management of hyperglycemia recommend the use of agents with proven cardiovascular (CV) benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established CV disease. Although both glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce the risk of major adverse CV events (MACE) in high-risk populations with T2D, the ideal choice between the two classes for people with coronary artery disease remains controversial. SGLT2i reduce CV risk primarily through hemodynamic effects and changes in energy metabolism, making them the first choice in cases where heart failure or chronic kidney disease predominates. On the other hand, GLP-1 RA exert powerful anti-atherogenic properties that are the main drivers of their cardioprotection, and seem to have a consistent benefit in the atherosclerotic components of MACE. However, most people with diabetes and CV disease could take advantage of the complementary effects of the two drug categories on glycemic control, body weight, and diabetic complications. Future mechanistic studies and clinical head-to-head trials are expected to shed more light on this intriguing clinical dilemma and provide clear guidance for daily practice. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

l-Carnitine/Simvastatin Reduces Lipoprotein (a) Levels Compared with Simvastatin Monotherapy: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. There are currently limited therapeutic options to lower Lp(a) levels. l-Carnitine has been reported to reduce Lp(a) levels. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of l-carnitine/simvastatin co-administration with that of simvastatin monotherapy on Lp(a) levels in subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia and elevated Lp(a) concentration. Subjects with levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >160 mg/dL, triacylglycerol (TAG) >150 mg/dL and Lp(a) >20 mg/dL were included in this study. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive l-carnitine 2 g/day plus simvastatin 20 mg/day (N = 29) or placebo plus simvastatin 20 mg/day (N = 29) for a total of 12 weeks. Lp(a) was significantly reduced in the l-carnitine/simvastatin group [−19.4%, from 52 (20–171) to 42 (15–102) mg/dL; p = 0.01], but not in the placebo/simvastatin group [−6.7%, from 56 (26–108) to 52 (27–93) mg/dL, p = NS versus baseline and p = 0.016 for the comparison between groups]. Similar significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein (apo) B and TAG were observed in both groups. Co-administration of l-carnitine with simvastatin was associated with a significant, albeit modest, reduction in Lp(a) compared with simvastatin monotherapy in subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia and elevated baseline Lp(a) levels. © 2016, AOCS

Effect of barnidipine on blood pressure and serum metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension: A pilot study

The effect of barnidipine, a calcium channel blocker, on metabolic parameters is not well known. The authors conducted the present pilot study to evaluate the possible effects of barnidipine on parameters involved in atherogenesis, oxidative stress, and clotting activity. This open-label intervention study included 40 adult patients with essential hypertension who received barnidipine 10 mg once daily. Barnidipine significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as isoprostane levels, which represent a reliable marker of oxidative stress. In contrast, barnidipine had a neutral effect on lipid profile and apolipoprotein levels, did not influence glucose homeostasis, had no effect on renal function, and did not cause any changes in electrolyte levels. Moreover, barnidipine did not affect either the clotting/fibrinolytic status (evaluated by measurement of fibrinogen, total plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue plasminogen activator, and a2 antiplasmin) or the enzymatic activity of the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory mediators lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and paraoxonase 1, respectively. Barnidipine should be mainly considered as an antihypertensive agent with neutral effects on most of the studied metabolic parameters in hypertensive patients. Any antioxidant effect of barnidipine needs further investigation. © 2006 Sage Publications

Long-term impact of multifactorial treatment on new-onset diabetes and related cardiovascular events in metabolic syndrome: A post hoc ATTEMPT analysis

This post hoc analysis of the Assessing The Treatment Effect in Metabolic Syndrome Without Perceptible diabeTes (ATTEMPT) study assesses the 31/2 year incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) and related cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), after multifactorial (lifestyle and drug, including atorvastatin) intervention. Patients were randomized to group A (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] target <100 mg/dL) and group B (<130 mg/dL). The incidence of NOD during the 42-month follow-up was very low, 0.83 to 1.00/100 patient-years in patients with MetS and MetS with impaired fasting glucose, respectively. Older age, increased waist circumference, and persistent MetS were determinants of NOD. One CVD nonfatal event occurred in the 28 patients with NOD. Our findings suggest that treating the characteristics of MetS is achievable and beneficial. New-onset diabetes incidence and CVD events were negligible and not different from what is expected in the general population. © 2012 The Author(s)

PCSK9 inhibitors in clinical practice: Novel directions and new experiences

Background: In randomized clinical trials, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) effectively reduce low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) with a favorable tolerability and safety profile. Our purpose is to provide real-world data regarding the indications, efficacy and safety of PCSK9i. Methods: The cohort comprised 141 patients who attended the lipid clinic of 3 hospitals in Greece and started using PCSK9i. Patients were requested to attend the lipid clinic at 3 months and at 1 year. Results: Ninety percent of patients had heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (heFH) and 75% had cardiovascular disease (CVD). A PCSK9i [evolocumab 140 mg/2 weeks (n = 82), alirocumab 75 mg/2 weeks (n = 46) and alirocumab 150 mg/2 weeks (n = 13)] was prescribed due to failure to achieve LDL-C targets despite maximum lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in 75% of patients, while in the remaining cases, the indication was statin intolerance. The mean reduction of LDL-C at 3 months was 56.2% and remained constant at 12 months (55.8% reduction from baseline). LDL-C target was achieved by 68.1% of patients at 3 months. “Totally” intolerant to statins patients (unable to tolerate any statin dose, n = 23) showed the lowest LDL-C reduction (47.7%). Side effects attributed to treatment were reported by 14 patients (10%). The total number of patients who stopped PCSK9i at 1 year was 14 (10%) but only 2 (1.4%) discontinued treatment because of side effects (myalgias). Conclusions: Our real-world results of PCSK9i showed comparable efficacy and tolerability to those reported in clinical trials and highlighted the value of treatment with PCSK9i heFH patients not achieving LDL-C targets despite maximum LLT and high or very high risk statin intolerant patients. © 2019 Hellenic Society of Cardiolog

An insight into familial hypercholesterolemia in greece: rationale and design of the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common metabolic genetic disorder. It is estimated that around 13 million people worldwide have FH. At the same time, only 25% of FH patients have been diagnosed. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated. The true prevalence of FH in Greece is unknown, but it is estimated that there are at least 40,000 FH patients nationwide pointing to a prevalence of 1:250. Patients with FH are at a high risk for cardiovascular events and death at an early age. Therefore, prompt detection of these patients is of pivotal importance in order to implement appropriate preventive measures at a young age. Patient registries are a powerful tool for recording and monitoring a disease and promoting clinical practices, thus contributing to improved outcomes and reduction of healthcare costs. National registries of FH patients have been a success in the Netherlands, Spain and Wales. As Greece did not have a national FH registry, the Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society has organized, established and funded the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HELLAS-FH) national registry in order to promote a better understanding of FH in our country. © 2017, Hellenic Endocrine Society. All rights reserved

Assessing the treatment effect in metabolic syndrome without perceptible diabetes (ATTEMPT): A prospective-randomized study in middle aged men and women

Aim: To assess the reduction in estimated cardiovascular disease (e-CVD) risk after multifactorial treatment for 6 months and follow this change during the next 3-years. Patients-Methods: This prospective, randomized, target driven study included 1,123 subjects (512/611 men/women, aged 45-65 years) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) without diabetes or CVD referred to specialist outpatient clinics. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups: group A with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <100 mg/dl and group B with a target of <130 mg/dl. Atorvastatin was used in both groups on top of optimal multifactorial treatment, (quinapril, amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension, metformin for impaired fasting glucose, and orlistat for obesity). The e-CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham, the PROCAM and Reynold's equations. Results: Reductions in e-CVD risk at 6 months were >50% in all patients, but were superior in group A and in women. Reductions were even greater during the next 3-years and were mainly attributed to changes in lipid profile. Actual CVD events were 1 in group A and 13 in group B; p=0.0012. Conclusions: Attaining the treatment target of LDL-C<100 mg/dl within multifactorial treatment of MetS by expert clinics, is achievable and beneficial even in patients without diabetes or known CVD. This induces a considerable e-CVD risk reduction in MetS patients. Actual CVD events were negligible, suggesting that e-CVD risk overestimates actual CVD risk in MetS, at least in patients achieving LDL-C<100 mg/dl [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00416741]. © 2011 Bentham Science Publishers