Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Natural History of Periodontal Disease in Adults: Findings from the Tecumseh Periodontal Disease Study, 1959-87

The purpose of this epidemiological study was to estimate the degree of change in periodontal attachment level in a sample of adults examined in 1959 and 1987 in Tecumseh, Michigan. Out of 526 individuals between the ages of five and 60 years in 1959, a sample of 325 resided within an 80-km-radius area in 1987. Of those, 167 were re-examined. Loss of periodontal attachment (LPA) was determined with a Michigan #0 probe on four tooth sites (disto-buccal, mid-buccal, mesio-buccal, mid-lingual) for all teeth present. Of the individuals contacted, 28 had lost all their teeth during the 28 years. Of the 167 adults examined, two refused periodontal probing. Out of the 165 adults with LPA measurements in 1987, only 22 (13.3%) had an average increased loss of 2 mm or more per person between 1959 and 1987; five adults (3.0%) had an average LPA increase of 3 mm or more, and only two adults (1.2%) had an average LPA increase of 4 mm or more. The attachment level in 59.3% of all the tooth sites examined in 1959 in the 165 individuals either did not change or changed within ± 1.0 mm. On the basis of bivariate analyses, the individuals with high LPA increase (≥2 mm) had the following characteristics significantly different from those with low LPA increase: They were older, smoked, had tooth mobility at baseline, higher gingivitis, plaque, calculus, and tooth mobility scores at follow-up, lower education level, and irregular dental attendance. However, in logistic regression analyses, only the following risk markers remained significantly associated with high LPA increase: age, smoking, and presence of tooth mobility.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67852/2/10.1177_00220345900690020201.pd

Population exposure to a novel influenza A virus over three waves of infection

The influenza A(H1N1)2009 virus has been spreading throughout the world since April 2009. Since then, several studies have been undertaken to measure the frequency of antibodies that react against the virus. Microneutralisation assays have regularly been used for these analyses, and titres of ≥40 have conventionally been taken to represent significant levels of antibodies (this significance is derived from it being four times the minimum level of antibodies that the assay can detect rather an established correlate of protection). However a microneutralisation titre that correlates with protection against influenza A(H1N1)2009 has not been established. Analysing influenza A(H1N1)2009 antibody seroprevalence in Scotland at multiple timepoints, and in different age groups and geographical locations, and comprehensively describing the spread of the virus in Scotland (taken alongside previously published data). This study presents for the first time the effects of a novel influenza virus on a naïve population that has been followed from the initial outbreak to a time when the majority of the population have reactive antibodies. A microneutralisation titre ≥10 represents the minimum level of antibodies detectable by the assay. Blood samples (taken in April 2009 and April 2010 in Edinburgh (n=400 each year), and in February 2011 in Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Inverness (n=1600)) were tested for the presence of influenza A(H1N1)2009 antibodies at this titre. This represents an effective indicator of the proportion of a population who have been exposed to the virus. Following the 2010/2011 influenza season, there is evidence of exposure to influenza A(H1N1)2009 in approximately four fifths of the Scottish population. This study provides impetus to the call for further research in establishing robust correlates of susceptibility to influenza infection and the development of clinical illness, provides useful information for future outbreaks, and is relevant to public health policy in planning for future influenza seasons