3 research outputs found
Determination of biological activity of gonadotrophins in inbred and outbred animals. Part 1: Determination of biological activity of follicle-stimulating hormone
Scientific relevance. The biological activity of medicinal products may vary depending on the method of production (i.e. biological or recombinant products). The widening variety of gonadotrophin preparations, the diversity of their production methods, and the irreplaceability of biological activity bioassays with physicochemical tests require improvement of animal testing conditions.Aim. This study aimed to determine the biological activity of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in several rat lines, analyse the findings, and select the most optimal testing conditions.Materials and methods. The biological activity was determined using in vivo methods. The comparative analysis used test results obtained over several years in inbred and outbred rats treated with FSH. In all cases, the authors used a three-dose randomised method based on the determination of the biological activity of test samples by comparison with that of the WHO international standard (IS) containing 183 IU of FSH bioactivity and 177 IU of LH bioactivity per ampoule (NIBSC code: 10/286). The study included immature female rats, inbred (Wistar-Kyoto or Sprague Dawley) and outbred. Testing conditions depended on the selected rat line, with the main variables being the test dose and the number of animals per group.Results. The authors compared responses of inbred and outbred rats to various doses of the FSH IS and test samples. Given the narrow range of the analytical procedure, Wistar-Kyoto rats showed a relatively weak doseβresponse relationship. The study demonstrated that the doses and testing duration depended on the sensitivity of the animals. Test results were less variable in inbred rats than in outbred ones. The statistical analysis of the results of FSH bioactivity testing in inbred and outbred rats showed that, with inbred rats, the number of animals could be halved without compromising the validity of the test.Conclusions. The approach proposed in this study provides for testing the biological activity of FSH with fewer experimental animals, improved cost-effectiveness, and the same reliability of results
Determination of the Biological Activity of Insulin and Its Analogues in Animals
In recent years, there has been a tendency to equate the results of insulin testing by physicochemical methods with its biological activity. However, it should be emphasised that the effectiveness of insulin preparations can be judged only by the reaction of the whole organism, i.e. by the hypoglycaemic action, which is a composite indicator. The determination of the biological activity of insulin has become especially relevant with the pharmaceutical market entry of insulin biosimilars, which are practically not analogous to the original medicinal products. The effectiveness of insulin products cannot be adequately evaluated using only physicochemical testing. At present, the biological activity of insulin is tested in rabbits. Additionally, the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation includes an alternative method to determine this parameter using mice. Owing to the physiological characteristics of mice, an adequate test would require special attention to the selection of test concentrations of insulin. The aim of the study was to offer recommendations for choosing the range of insulin concentrations for determining its biological activity in mice with due consideration of changes in their sensitivity depending on the season. Materials and methods: the authors analysed the results of testing the biological activity of insulin in female mice, bearing in mind the analytical range of the method specified in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. Test concentrations of insulin were selected taking into account seasonal shifts in insulin sensitivity of the animals. Results: the study demonstrated significant dose dependence and linearity of the responses of female mice to insulin in the concentration range of 0.03β0.3 IU/mL. Therefore, this range can be recommended as a guideline for determining the biological activity of insulin in female mice. The selection of test concentrations is illustrated with specific examples. Conclusions: the authors offer a methodological approach to the selection of insulin concentrations and the assessment of the validity of test results during biological activity determination using twin-crossover tests in female mice
ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
In recent years, there has been a tendency to equate the results of insulin testing by physicochemical methods with its biological activity. However, it should be emphasised that the effectiveness of insulin preparations can be judged only by the reaction of the whole organism, i.e. by the hypoglycaemic action, which is a composite indicator. The determination of the biological activity of insulin has become especially relevant with the pharmaceutical market entry of insulin biosimilars, which are practically not analogous to the original medicinal products. The effectiveness of insulin products cannot be adequately evaluated using only physicochemical testing. At present, the biological activity of insulin is tested in rabbits. Additionally, the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation includes an alternative method to determine this parameter using mice. Owing to the physiological characteristics of mice, an adequate test would require special attention to the selection of test concentrations of insulin. The aim of the study was to offer recommendations for choosing the range of insulin concentrations for determining its biological activity in mice with due consideration of changes in their sensitivity depending on the season. Materials and methods: the authors analysed the results of testing the biological activity of insulin in female mice, bearing in mind the analytical range of the method specified in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. Test concentrations of insulin were selected taking into account seasonal shifts in insulin sensitivity of the animals. Results: the study demonstrated significant dose dependence and linearity of the responses of female mice to insulin in the concentration range of 0.03β0.3 IU/mL. Therefore, this range can be recommended as a guideline for determining the biological activity of insulin in female mice. The selection of test concentrations is illustrated with specific examples. Conclusions: the authors offer a methodological approach to the selection of insulin concentrations and the assessment of the validity of test results during biological activity determination using twin-crossover tests in female mice.Π ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ½ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ± ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, Ρ.Π΅. ΠΏΠΎ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ
. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΈ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠ€ Π Π€) Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠ°Ρ
. Π ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ: ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠ°Ρ
Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠ°Ρ
-ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π² ΠΠ€ Π Π€. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π²Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ± ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ: ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ-ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ 0,03β0,3 ΠΠ/ΠΌΠ» Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠ°Ρ
-ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
. ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, ΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π±ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΡΠ°Ρ
-ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ