22 research outputs found

    The neurobiology of social play behaviour: past, present and future

    Get PDF
    Social play behaviour is a highly energetic and rewarding activity that is of great importance for the development of brain and behaviour. Social play is abundant during the juvenile and early adolescent phases of life, and it occurs in most mammalian species, as well as in certain birds and reptiles. To date, the majority of research into the neural mechanisms of social play behaviour has been performed in male rats. In the present review we summarize studies on the neurobiology of social play behaviour in rats, including work on pharmacological and genetic models for autism spectrum disorders, early life manipulations and environmental factors that influence play in rats. We describe several recent developments that expand the field, and highlight outstanding questions that may guide future studies

    Individual Differences in Social Play Behaviour Predict Alcohol Intake and Control Over Alcohol Seeking in Rats

    Get PDF
    Rationale Social play behaviour is a rewarding social activity displayed by young mammals, thought to be important for the development of brain and behaviour. Indeed, disruptions of social play behaviour in rodents have been associated with cognitive deficits and augmented sensitivity to self-administration of substances of abuse, including alcohol, later in life. However, the relation between social development and loss of control over substance use, a key characteristic of substance use disorders including alcohol use disorder (AUD), has not been investigated. Moreover, it remains unknown how inherent differences in playfulness relate to differences in the sensitivity to substance use and AUD. Objective The objective of this study is to determine how individual differences in juvenile social play behaviour predict alcohol intake and loss of control over alcohol seeking. Methods Juvenile male Lister hooded rats were characterized for their tendency to engage in social play behaviour. Subsequently, alcohol consumption and conditioned suppression of alcohol seeking were assessed in the tertiles of rats that showed the most and least social play. Results The rats that engaged most in social play behaviour consumed more alcohol than their less playful counterparts. However, whereas the most playful rats showed intact conditioned suppression of alcohol seeking, the least playful rats showed no such suppression. Conclusion Individual levels of playfulness predict the sensitivity to alcohol-directed behaviour. Highly playful rats are more prone to alcohol intake, yet show greater control over alcohol seeking. These findings increase our understanding of the relationship between social development and vulnerability to AUD

    β-Adrenoreceptor Stimulation Mediates Reconsolidation of Social Reward-Related Memories

    Get PDF
    In recent years, the notion that consolidated memories become transiently unstable after retrieval and require reconsolidation to persist for later use has received strong experimental support. To date, the majority of studies on reconsolidation have focused on memories of negative emotions, while the dynamics of positive memories have been less well studied. Social play, the most characteristic social behavior displayed by young mammals, is important for social and cognitive development. It has strong rewarding properties, illustrated by the fact that it can induce conditioned place preference (CPP). In order to understand the dynamics of positive social memories, we evaluated the effect of propranolol, a β-adrenoreceptor antagonist known to influence a variety of memory processes, on acquisition, consolidation, retrieval and reconsolidation of social play-induced CPP in adolescent rats.Systemic treatment with propranolol, immediately before or after a CPP test (i.e. retrieval session), attenuated CPP 24 h later. Following extinction, CPP could be reinstated in saline--but not in propranolol-treated rats, indicating that propranolol treatment had persistently disrupted the CPP memory trace. Propranolol did not affect social play-induced CPP in the absence of memory retrieval or when administered 1 h or 6 h after retrieval. Furthermore, propranolol did not affect acquisition, consolidation or retrieval of social play-induced CPP.We conclude that β-adrenergic neurotransmission selectively mediates the reconsolidation, but not other processes involved in the storage and stability of social reward-related memories in adolescent rats. These data support the notion that consolidation and reconsolidation of social reward-related memories in adolescent rats rely on distinct neural mechanisms

    Effects of PROP on acquisition (panel A) and consolidation (panel B) of social play-induced CPP.

    No full text
    <p>The experimental protocol is depicted above the graph (Pre-C: pre-conditioning test, CS: daily conditioning sessions, consisting of one session with and one session without a play-partner present). PROP was administered either 30 min before (acquisition) or immediately after (consolidation) each conditioning session. Data represent the mean time (sec ± SEM) spent in the social compartment (grey bars) and the non-social compartment (white bars) during a 15 min retrieval-session. Saline-treated animals (2 ml/kg, <i>i.p.</i>, acquisition: n = 16, consolidation: n = 12), PROP-treated animals (10 mg/kg, <i>i.p.</i>, acquisition: n = 16, consolidation: n = 12). Post-hoc Student's paired t-tests for difference in time spent in the social- and non-social compartment **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.</p

    Effects of 1h and 6h delayed post-retrieval PROP on reconsolidation of social play-induced CPP.

    No full text
    <p>The experimental protocol is depicted above the graph (Pre-C: pre-conditioning test, CS+: conditioning session with a play-partner, CS-: conditioning session alone). Data represent the mean time (sec ± SEM) spent in the social compartment (grey bars) and the non-social compartment (white bars) during 15 min retrieval- (RETR) and test- (TEST) sessions. Saline-treated animals (2 ml/kg, <i>i.p</i>., n = 17), 1 h delayed PROP-treated animals (10 mg/kg, <i>i.p</i>., n = 13), 6 h delayed PROP-treated animals (10 mg/kg, <i>i.p.,</i> n = 10). Post-hoc Student's paired t-tests for difference in time spent in the social- and non-social compartment *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.</p
    corecore