6,853 research outputs found
nsolvency Experience, Risk-Based Capital, and Prompt Corrective Action in Property-Liability Insurance
In December 1992, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) adopted a life-health insurer risk-based capital (RBC) formula and model law that became effective with the 1993 annual statement filed in March 1994. In principle, well-designed RBC requirements can help achieve an efficient reduction in the expected costs of insolvencies. They can provide incentives for insurers to operate safely in cases where market incentives are weak due to government mandated guarantees of insurer obligations or asymmetries regarding solvency between insurers and buyers. RBC requirements also may facilitate or encourage prompt corrective action by solvency regulators by helping regulators to identify weak insurers and giving regulators legal authority to intervene when capital falls below specified levels. RBC requirements may force regulators to act in amore timely manner when confronted with external pressure to delay action. However, RBC capital requirements have a number ofpotential limitations. Unavoidable imperfections in any meaningful RBC system will likely distort some insurer decisions in undesirable and unintended ways. RBC requirements by themselves will do little or nothing to help regulators determine when an insurer s reported capital (surplus) is overstated due to understatement of liabilities or overstatement of assets. A well-designed RBC system should minimize costs associated with misclassification of insurers. The system should be able to identify a high proportion of troubled companies early enough to permit regulators to take prompt corrective action and should identify as troubled only a minimal proportion of financially sound insurers. This study analyzes data on solvent and insolvent property-liability insurers to determine whether modifications in the NAIC s RBC formula can improve its ability to predict firms that subsequently fail without substantially increasing the proportion of surviving insurers that are incorrectly predicted to fail. It uses logistic regression models to investigate whether changes in the weight for the major components in the RBC formula and incorporation of information on company size and organizational form improve the tradeoff between Type I error rates (the percentage of insurers that later failed that are incorrectly predicted not to fail) and the Type II error rates (the percentage of surviving insurers that are incorrectly predicted to fail). The data analyzed were for 1989-91 for firms that subsequently failed and for firms that survived through the first nine months of 1993. The authors make four main conclusions. First, less than half of the companies that later failed had RBC ratios within the proposed ranges for regulatory and company action. Second, total and component RBC ratios generally are significantly different for failed and surviving firms based on univariate tests. Third, estimation of multiple logistic regression models of insolvency risk indicated that allowing the weights of the RBC component to vary and including firm size and organizational form variables generally produce a material improvement in the tradeoff between sample Type I and Type II error rates. And, fourth,the RBC models are noticeably less successful in predicting large firm insolvencies than in predicting smaller insolvencies. Regarding the estimated weights in the logistic regression models, a major conclusion is the reserve component of the NAIC risk-based capital formula, which accounts for half of industry risk-based capital, has virtually no predictive power in any of the tests conducted. Given the high costs associated with large failures and the inferior performance of the models in predicting large insolvencies, a higher payoff in terms of reduced insolvency costs is likely to be achieved by developing models that perform better for large firms.
Liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes : a single technology appraisal
This paper presents a summary of the Evidence Review Group (ERG) report into the clinical
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of liraglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus,
based upon the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. The manufacturer
proposed the use of liraglutide as a second or third drug in patients with type 2 diabetes whose
glycaemic control was unsatisfactory with metformin, with or without a second oral glucoselowering
drug. The submission included six manufacturer-sponsored trials that compared the
efficacy of liraglutide against other glucose-lowering agents. Not all of the trials were relevant to the decision problem. The most relevant were Liraglutide Effects and Actions in Diabetes 5
(LEAD-5) (liraglutide used as part of triple therapy and compared against insulin glargine) and
LEAD-6 [liraglutide in triple therapy compared against another glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
agonist, exenatide]. Five of the six trials were published in full and one was then unpublished.
Two doses of liraglutide, 1.2 and 1.8 mg, were used in some trials but in the two comparisons
in triple therapy, against glargine and exenatide, only the 1.8-mg dose was used. Liraglutide
in both doses was found to be clinically effective in lowering blood glucose concentration
[glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)], reducing weight (unlike other glucose-lowering agents, such
as sulphonylureas, glitazones and insulins, which cause weight gain) and also reducing systolic
blood pressure (SBP). Hypoglycaemia was uncommon. The ERG carried out meta-analyses
comparing the 1.2- and 1.8-mg doses of liraglutide, which suggested that there was no difference
in control of diabetes, and only a slight difference in weight loss, insufficient to justify the extra
cost
New Wine in an Old Bottle : The Advent of Social Media Discovery in Pennsylvania Civil Litigation Matters
New Wine in an Old Bottle : The Advent of Social Media Discovery in Pennsylvania Civil Litigation Matters
Quenching of the Fluorescence of Tris (2 2-Bipyridine) Ruthenium(II) [Ru(bipy)3]2+ by a Dimeric Copper(II) Complex.
The quenching of the [Ru(bipy)3]2+ by Cu2L2+ was studied and the data were plotted with the Stern-Volmer equation. The plot showed a break and was divided into 2 regions, \u3c0.5 and \u3e0.5 Cu2L2+: [Ru(bipy)3]2+ molar ratio. Quenching above the 0.5 Cu2L2+: [Ru(bipy)3]2+ molar ratio was slower (330 x 10-6 M-1s-1) than the quenching rate reaction below 0.5 ratio (387 x 10-6 M-1s-1).
With Cu2L2+ being a dimeric complex the break and differences in the quenching reaction rates can be explained in terms of the stoichiometry. When the Cu2L2+: [Ru(bipy)3]2+ ratio is \u3c 0.5, then each [Ru(bipy)3]2+ can interact with 1 Cu2L2+ dimer. At 0.5 then there is exactly a 1:1 ratio RuII : CuII. Above the 0.5 ratio the [Ru(bipy)3]2+ can interact with maybe only one of the Cu2L2+\u27s in the dimer, or with a [Ru(bipy)3]2+: Cu2L2+ unit, so the quenching is less efficient
Evidence review : liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of liraglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, based upon the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal process. The manufacturer proposed the use of liraglutide as a second or third drug in patients with type 2 diabetes whose glycaemic control was unsatisfactory with metformin, with or without a second oral glucose-lowering drug. The submission included six manufacturer-sponsored trials that compared the efficacy of liraglutide against other glucose-lowering agents. Not all of the trials were relevant to the decision problem. The most relevant were Liraglutide Effects and Actions in Diabetes 5 (LEAD-5) (liraglutide used as part of triple therapy and compared against insulin glargine) and LEAD-6 [liraglutide in triple therapy compared against another glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, exenatide]. Five of the six trials were published in full and one was then unpublished. Two doses of liraglutide, 1.2 and 1.8 mg, were used in some trials, but in the two comparisons in triple therapy, against glargine and exenatide, only the 1.8-mg dose was used. Liraglutide in both doses was found to be clinically effective in lowering blood glucose concentration [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)], reducing weight (unlike other glucose-lowering agents, such as sulphonylureas, glitazones and insulins, which cause weight gain) and also reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP). Hypoglycaemia was uncommon. The ERG carried out meta-analyses comparing the 1.2- and 1.8-mg doses of liraglutide, which suggested that there was no difference in control of diabetes, and only a slight difference in weight loss, insufficient to justify the extra cost. The cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out using the Center for Outcomes Research model. The health benefit was reported as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The manufacturer estimated the cost-effectiveness to be £15,130 per QALY for liraglutide 1.8 mg compared with glargine, £10,054 per QALY for liraglutide 1.8 mg compared with exenatide, £10,465 per QALY for liraglutide 1.8 mg compared with sitagliptin, and £9851 per QALY for liraglutide 1.2 mg compared with sitagliptin. The ERG conducted additional sensitivity analyses and concluded that the factors that carried most weight were:
in the comparison with glargine, the direct utility effects of body mass index (BMI) changes and SBP, with some additional contribution from HbA1c
in the comparison with exenatide, HbA1c, with some additional effects from cholesterol and triglycerides
in the comparison with sitagliptin, HbA1c and direct utility effects of BMI changes.
The European Medicines Agency has approved liraglutide in dual therapy with other oral glucose-lowering agents. NICE guidance recommends the use of liraglutide 1.2 mg in triple therapy when glycaemic control remains or becomes inadequate with a combination of two oral glucose-lowering drugs. The use of liraglutide 1.2 mg in a dual therapy is indicated only in patients who are intolerant of, or have contraindications to, three oral glucose-lowering drugs. The use of liraglutide 1.8 mg was not approved by NICE. The ERG recommends research into the (currently unlicensed) use of liraglutide in combination with long-acting insulin
Change in commute mode and BMI: longitudinal, prospective evidence from UK Biobank
BACKGROUND: Insufficient physical activity is a determinant of obesity and cardiovascular disease. Active travel to work has declined in high-income countries in recent decades. We aimed to determine which socioeconomic and demographic characteristics predicted switching to or from active commuting, whether switching from passive to active commuting (or the reverse) independently predicts change in objectively measured body-mass index (BMI), and to ascertain whether any association is attenuated by socioeconomic, demographic, or behavioural factors.
METHODS: This study used longitudinal data from UK Biobank. Baseline data collection occurred at 22 centres between March, 2006, and July, 2010, with a repeat assessment at one centre (Stockport) between August, 2012, and June, 2013, for a subset of these participants. Height and weight were objectively measured at both timepoints. We included individuals present at both timepoints with complete data in the analytic sample. Participants were aged 40–69 years and commuted from home to a workplace on a regular basis at both baseline and follow-up. Two exposures were investigated: transition from car commuting to active or public transport commuting and transition from active or public transport to car commuting. Change in BMI between baseline and repeat assessment was the outcome of interest, assessed with bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
FINDINGS: 502 656 individuals provided baseline data, with 20 346 participating in the repeat assessment after a median of 4·4 years (IQR 3·7–4·9). 5861 individuals were present at both timepoints and had complete data for all analytic variables. Individuals who transitioned from car commuting at baseline to active or public transportation modes at follow-up had a decrease in BMI of −0·30 kg/m2 (95% CI −0·47 to −0·13; p=0·0005). Conversely, individuals who transitioned from active commuting at baseline to car commuting at follow-up had a BMI increase of 0·32 kg/m2 (0·13 to 0·50; p=0·008). These effects were not attenuated by adjustment for hypothesised confounders. Change in household income emerged as a determinant of commute mode transitions.
INTERPRETATION: Incorporation of increased levels of physical activity as part of the commute to work could reduce obesity among middle-aged adults in the UK.
FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council
Generating-function method for tensor products
This is the first of two articles devoted to a exposition of the
generating-function method for computing fusion rules in affine Lie algebras.
The present paper is entirely devoted to the study of the tensor-product
(infinite-level) limit of fusions rules.
We start by reviewing Sharp's character method. An alternative approach to
the construction of tensor-product generating functions is then presented which
overcomes most of the technical difficulties associated with the character
method. It is based on the reformulation of the problem of calculating tensor
products in terms of the solution of a set of linear and homogeneous
Diophantine equations whose elementary solutions represent ``elementary
couplings''. Grobner bases provide a tool for generating the complete set of
relations between elementary couplings and, most importantly, as an algorithm
for specifying a complete, compatible set of ``forbidden couplings''.Comment: Harvmac (b mode : 39 p) and Pictex; this is a substantially reduced
version of hep-th/9811113 (with new title); to appear in J. Math. Phy
- …