22 research outputs found

    Autonomic nervous system function in chronic hypotension associated with Bartter and Gitelman syndromes

    No full text
    Autonomic nervous system dysfunction has a major role in the blood pressure (BP) decrease associated with orthostatic hypotension and syncope. The clinical picture of Bartter and Gitelman syndromes includes reduced extracellular fluid volume and normotension or hypotension, but no study has explored autonomic nervous system status in patients with hypotensive episodes associated with these diseases. We tested sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system function in 4 patients with Bartter and Gitelman syndromes with chronic hypotension. Each patient underwent a battery of autonomic reflex tests, including BP and heart rate response to orthostatism, Valsalva maneuver, cold-pressor test, hand-grip test, and deep breathing. Plasma catecholamines also were measured. BP was monitored during tests by means of continuous noninvasive finger BP recording. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 1 patient who experienced syncope episodes. Valsalva ratio ranged from 1.21 to 1.61. During the cold-pressor test, the range of systolic and diastolic BP increases were 8 to 31 and 6 to 24 mm Hg, respectively. During the hand-grip test, systolic and diastolic BP increases ranged from 10 to 39 and 8 to 32 mm Hg, respectively. During hyperventilation, the difference between the highest and lowest heart rates was 12 or more beats/min in all patients. Patients' plasma norepinephrine concentrations increased during standing. Our preliminary results suggest that chronic hypotension in patients with Bartter and Gitelman syndromes is not associated with sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system dysfunction, even when orthostatic hypotension is present. This normal autonomic function suggests that other pathophysiological mechanisms, such as the characteristic vasoconstrictor abnormal cell signaling, may account for hypotension in patients with Bartter and Gitelman syndromes

    BP reactivity to public speaking in stage 1 hypertension: Influence of different task scenarios.

    No full text
    Aim. To investigate the blood pressure (BP) reaction to public speaking performed according to different emotionally distressing scenarios in stage 1 hypertension. Methods. We assessed 64 hypertensive and 30 normotensive subjects. They performed three speech tasks with neutral, anger and anxiety scenarios. BP was assessed with the Finometer beat-to-beat non-invasive recording system throughout the test procedure. Results. For all types of speech, the systolic BP response was greater in the hypertensive than the normotensive subjects (all p < 0.001). At repeated-measures analysis of covariate (R-M ANCOVA), a significant group-by-time interaction was found for all scenarios (p <= 0.001). For the diastolic BP response, the between-group difference was significant for the task with anxiety scenario (p < 0.05). At R-M ANCOVA, a group-by-time interaction of borderline statistical significance was found for the speech with anxiety content (p = 0.053) but not for the speeches with neutral or anger content. Within the hypertensive group, the diastolic BP increments during the speeches with anxiety and anger scenarios were greater than those during the speech with neutral scenario (both p < 0.001). Conclusions. These data indicate that reactivity to public speaking is increased in stage 1 hypertension. A speech with anxiety or anger scenario elicits a greater diastolic BP reaction than tasks with neutral content

    Biofeedback-assisted cardiovascular control in hypertensives exposed to emotional stress: A pilot study

    No full text
    The study was aimed at examining the effect of a short Heart Rate-Biofeedback (HR-BF) protocol on systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure levels and BP emotional reactivity. Twenty-four unmedicated outpatients with pre- and stage 1 hypertension, were randomly assigned to active treatment (BF-Training) or control (BP-Monitoring) group. Subjects in BF-Training Group underwent four BF sessions. Guided imagery of stressful events was introduced during sessions 3 and 4. Control participants self-monitored their BP at home for 4 weeks. Subjects in both groups performed an emotional Speech Test before and after the training (or monitoring) period. SBP and mean arterial pressure responses to the emotional Speech Test were significantly smaller after the BF-training than the BP-monitoring. Moreover, clinic SBP and DBP were significantly reduced by about 10 mmHg in BF-Training Group, whereas they remained unchanged in control group. Self-monitored BP decreased significantly in the active treatment group and not in control group. A short BF-training, including guided imagery of stressful events, was effective in reducing BP reactions to a psychosocial stressor. BP measured in the clinic, and selfmonitored at home were also significantly reduced in the BF-Training Group. HR-BF appears to be a suitable intervention for hypertensive patients, mostly when BP increase is associated with emotional activation

    The risk of thromboembolism and need for oral anticoagulation after successful atrial fibrillation ablation

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesThe aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety of discontinuing oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) after apparently successful pulmonary vein isolation.BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE) and often requires OAT. Pulmonary vein isolation is considered an effective treatment for AF.MethodsWe studied 3,355 patients, of whom 2,692 (79% male, mean age 57 ± 11 years) discontinued OAT 3 to 6 months after ablation (Off-OAT group) and 663 (70% male, mean age 59 ± 11 years) remained on OAT after this period (On-OAT group). CHADS2(congestive heart failure, hypertension, age [75 years and older], diabetes mellitus, and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack) risk scores of 1 and ≥2 were recorded in 723 (27%) and 347 (13%) Off-OAT group patients and in 261 (39%) and 247 (37%) On-OAT group patients, respectively.ResultsDuring follow-up (mean 28 ± 13 months vs. 24 ± 15 months), 2 (0.07%) Off-OAT group patients and 3 (0.45%) On-OAT group patients had an ischemic stroke (p = 0.06). No other thromboembolic events occurred. No Off-OAT group patient with a CHADS2risk score of ≥2 had an ischemic stroke. A major hemorrhage was observed in 1 (0.04%) Off-OAT group patient and 13 (2%) On-OAT group patients (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn this nonrandomized study, the risk–benefit ratio favored the suspension of OAT after successful AF ablation even in patients at moderate-high risk of TE. This conclusion needs to be confirmed by future large randomized trials
    corecore