26 research outputs found
Beyond a Dichotomy of Perspectives: Understanding Religion on the Basis of Paul Natorpâs Logic of Boundary
Based on Paul Natorpâs (1854â1924) late post-Neo-Kantian âLogic of Boundaryâ (German: âGrenzlogikâ) I will offer a methodically controlled, non-reductionist and equally anti-essentialist reconstruction of the notion of religion. The pre-eminent objective of this reconstructive work is to overcome the well-known epistemological as well as methodological problem of a dichotomy between inside and outside perspectives on the subject of religion. Differently put, the objective consists in an attempt to demonstrate that there actually is âreason in religionâ that is intellectually accessible for academic knowledge production. Following Natorpâs splendid formulation I will argue that religion operates neither âwithinâ nor âbeyondâ the âboundary of humanityâ but exactly on [or âinâ] this boundary. More precisely, I will explicate that religious praxis (including its specific production of knowledge) from Natorpâs standpoint can be understood as the performative realization, and habitual embodiment of the (contextually concrete) boundary of humanity or human reason itself. Due to its principial self-referentiality this boundary carries the crucial sense of a first and last positive and, therefore, both in theoretical terms definitive and in practical terms eminently instructive notion of boundary with no outside. This paradoxically all-enclosing, positive boundary, while explicitly including lifeâs inevitable negativity but, nonetheless, able to ideally sublate it, is the reason why the practice of religion, as empirical evidence unmistakably documents, can provide an incommensurably fulfilling, significant and meaningful closure with regards to the innermost self-perception of its practitioners (concerning their self-determination or agency)