Committee V.1: Accidental Limit States

Concern for accidental scenarios for ships and offshore structures and for their structural components leading to limit states. Types of accidental scenarios shall include collision, grounding, dropped objects, explosion, and fire. Attention shall be given to hazard identification, accidental loads and nonlinear structural consequences including strength reduction, affecting the probability of failure and related risks. Uncertainties in the use of accidental scenarios for design and analysis shall be highlighted. Consideration shall be given to the practical application of methods and to the development of ISSC guidance for quantitative assessment and management of accidental risks

The Sandia Fracture Challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing

Existing and emerging methods in computational mechanics are rarely validated against problems with an unknown outcome. For this reason, Sandia National Laboratories, in partnership with US National Science Foundation and Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, launched a computational challenge in mid-summer, 2012. Researchers and engineers were invited to predict crack initiation and propagation in a simple but novel geometry fabricated from a common off-the-shelf commercial engineering alloy. The goal of this international Sandia Fracture Challenge was to benchmark the capabilities for the prediction of deformation and damage evolution associated with ductile tearing in structural metals, including physics models, computational methods, and numerical implementations currently available in the computational fracture community. Thirteen teams participated, reporting blind predictions for the outcome of the Challenge. The simulations and experiments were performed independently and kept confidential. The methods for fracture prediction taken by the thirteen teams ranged from very simple engineering calculations to complicated multiscale simulations. The wide variation in modeling results showed a striking lack of consistency across research groups in addressing problems of ductile fracture. While some methods were more successful than others, it is clear that the problem of ductile fracture prediction continues to be challenging. Specific areas of deficiency have been identified through this effort. Also, the effort has underscored the need for additional blind prediction-based assessments

Investigation of the effect of forming parameters in incremental sheet forming using a micromechanics based damage model

The incremental sheet forming (ISF) process is considered as a feasible solution for forming a variety of small batch and even customised sheet components. The quality of an ISF product is affected by various process parameters, e.g. sheet material, step-down, feed rate, tool diameter and lubricant. To produce an ISF part of sufficient quality and accuracy without defects, optimal parameters of the ISF process should be selected. In the present work, experiments and FE analyses were conducted to evaluate the influence of the main ISF process parameters including the step-down, feed rate and tool diameter on the formability and fracture of two types of pure Ti (grade 1 and 2). The Gurson–Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage constitutive model with consideration of stress triaxiality was developed to predict ductile fracture in the ISF process due to void nucleation, growth and coalescence. It was found that the ISF parameters have varying degrees of effect on the formability and fracture occurrence of the two types of pure Ti, and grade 2 pure Ti sheet is more sensitive than grade 1 Ti sheet to the forming parameters due to low ductility