150 research outputs found

    Alcohol consumption and body composition in a population-based sample of elderly Australian men

    Full text link
    Background: Alcohol is calorie dense, and impacts&nbsp;activity, appetite and lipid processing. The aim of this&nbsp;study was to therefore investigate the association between&nbsp;alcohol consumption and components of body composition&nbsp;including bone, fat and lean tissue.Methods: Participants were recruited from a randomly&nbsp;selected, population-based sample of 534 men aged&nbsp;65 years and older enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis&nbsp;Study. Alcohol intake was ascertained using a food&nbsp;frequency questionnaire and the sample categorised as nondrinkers or alcohol users who consumed B2, 3&ndash;4 or C5&nbsp;standard drinks on a usual drinking day. Bone mineral&nbsp;density (BMD), lean body mass and body fat mass were&nbsp;measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; overall&nbsp;adiposity (%body fat), central adiposity (%truncal fat) and&nbsp;body mass index (BMI) were calculated. Bone quality was&nbsp;determined by quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS).Results: There were 90 current non-drinkers (16.9 %),&nbsp;266 (49.8 %) consumed 1&ndash;2 drinks/day, 104 (19.5 %) 3&ndash;4&nbsp;drinks/day and 74 (13.8 %) C5 drinks/day. Those consuming C5 drinks/day had greater BMI (?4.8 %), fat mass&nbsp;index (?20.1 %), waist circumference (?5.0 %), %body&nbsp;fat (?15.2 %) and proportion of trunk fat (?5.3 %) and&nbsp;lower lean mass (-5.0 %) than non-drinkers after adjustment for demographic and lifestyle factors. Furthermore,&nbsp;they were more likely to be obese than non-drinkers&nbsp;according to criteria based on BMI (OR = 2.83, 95 %CI&nbsp;1.10&ndash;7.29) or waist circumference (OR = 3.36, 95 %CI&nbsp;1.32&ndash;8.54). There was an inverse relationship between&nbsp;alcohol consumption and QUS parameters and BMD at the&nbsp;mid forearm site; no differences were detected for BMD at&nbsp;other skeletal sites.Conclusion:&nbsp;Higher alcohol intake was associated with&nbsp;greater total and central adiposity and reduced bone&nbsp;quality.<br /

    Association of socioeconomic status with overall overweight and central obesity in men and women: the French Nutrition and Health Survey 2006

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Identification of subpopulations at high risk of overweight and obesity is crucial for prevention and management of obesity in different socioeconomic status (SES) categories. The objective of the study was to describe disparities in the prevalence of overweight and obesity across socioeconomic status (SES) groups in 18–74 year-old French adults.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Analyses were based on a multistage stratified random sample of non-institutionalized adults aged 18–74-years-old from the French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS), a cross-sectional national survey carried out in 2006/2007. Collected data included measured anthropometry (weight, height and waist circumference (WC)), demographic and SES data (occupation, education and frequency of holiday trips as a marker of family income). SES factors associated with overweight (BMI ≥ 25) and central obesity (WC above gender-specific references) were identified using multiple logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Almost half (49.3%) of French adults were overweight or obese and 16.9% were obese. In men, the risk of overall overweight or obesity was associated with occupation (p < 0.05), whereas the risk of central obesity was independently associated with occupation (p < 0.05) and frequency of holiday trips (p < 0.01). In women, both overall and central overweight and obesity were independently associated with educational level (respectively p < 10<sup>-3 </sup>and p < 10<sup>-3</sup>) and frequency of holiday trips (respectively p < 0.05 and p < 10<sup>-3</sup>).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The prevalence of overweight and obesity was found to be similar to that of several neighbouring western European countries, and lower than the UK and eastern Europe. Risk of being overweight or obese varied across SES groups both in men and women, but associations were different between men and women, indicating differing determinants.</p

    Risk factors for overweight and obesity, and changes in body mass index of Chinese adults in Shanghai

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the past two decades, the prevalence of overweight or obesity has increased in China. The aims of this study were to firstly assess the baseline prevelences and the risk factors for overweight and obesity, and secondly to detect the changes of body mass index (BMI) over a follow-up period in Chinese adults in Shanghai.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The data set of a population-based longitudinal study was analyzed. Anthropometric and biochemical data were collected for 5364 subjects (aged 25–95 years) during a period of 1998–2001. Among those individuals, 3032 subjects were interviewed and reexamined at the second survey from 2003 to 2004. Then the standardized prevalences for overweight and obesity were calculated using baseline data; the possible contributing factors of overweight and obesity were detected using binary logistic regression analysis; and the changes of BMI were evaluated after an average of 3.6-year follow-up period.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>(1) According to the WHO standard and the Chinese standard, the sex- and age-standardized prevalences were 27.5% and 32.4% for overweight, and 3.7% and 9.1% for obesity, respectively. (2) The risks of overweight and obesity differed among different age groups. Family history of obesity increased the risk of overweight and obesity by about 1.2-fold for both genders. Current male smokers had a lower risk of overweight and obesity (OR = 0.76, <it>p </it>< 0.05) than nonsmokers. In contrast, current male drinkers had a higher risk of overweight and obesity (OR = 1.42, <it>p </it>< 0.05) than nondrinkers. Compared with low-educated women, medium- and high- educated women were at lower risk of overweight and obesity, and the corresponding ORs (95% CIs) were 0.64 (0.52–0.79) and 0.50(0.36–0.68), respectively. (3) The annual changes of BMI means ranged from an increase of 0.1 kg/m<sup>2 </sup>to a decrease of 0.2 kg/m<sup>2 </sup>(by genders and age groups). Meanwhile, the BMI increase was statistically significant in the 35–44 years age group, and the BMI decrease was significant above 65 years for both genders.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study showed high prevalence of overweight and obesity in Shanghai metropolis populations. The risk factors of overweight and obesity were multifactorial and gender specific. After 3.6 years, BMI means changed slightly, BMI increased mainly in middle-aged individuals and decreased in old individuals.</p
    corecore