19 research outputs found

    Measurement Properties of the Motivation for Youth Treatment Scale with a Residential Group Home Population

    Get PDF
    A client’s motivation to receive services has long been identified as a highly relevant component of mental health treatment. In fact, ample evidence demonstrates that client motivation is significantly related to seeking services, remaining in services, and improved client outcomes (e.g., Broome, Joe, & Simpson, 2001; Ryan, Plant, & O’Malley, 1995; Schroder, Sellman, Frampton, & Deering, 2009). Additionally, it has been recognized that motivation is a “dynamic” characteristic that changes throughout treatment (Melnick, De Leon, Hawke, Jainchill, & Kressel, 1997; Schroder et al., 2009). In this way, motivation is an important client factor to assess and monitor throughout the treatment process. The broad construct of motivation is comprised of two separate, but related components conceptualized as motivation to change and motivation for treatment. As defined by DiClamente, Schlundt, and Gemmell (2004), motivation to change refers to a willingness to recognize problematic behavior and take steps toward change, whereas motivation for treatment refers to a willingness to seek help and remain compliant with an intervention program. In other words, a motivated person not only perceives the importance of changing, but also has confidence that they are able to be successful at making the change (Burke, Arkowitz, & Menchola, 2003)

    The Effect of Natural Mulches on Crop Performance, Weed Suppression and Biochemical Constituents of Catnip and St. John\u27s Wort

    Get PDF
    Because of expanding markets for high-value niche crops, opportunities have increased for the production of medicinal herbs in the USA. An experiment was conducted in 2001 and 2002 near Gilbert, IA, to study crop performance, weed suppression, and environmental conditions associated with the use of several organic mulches in the production of two herbs, catnip (Nepeta cataria L.) and St. John\u27s wort (Hypericum perforatum L. ‘Helos’). Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design and included a positive (hand-weeded) control, a negative (nonweeded) control, oat straw, a flax straw mat, and a nonwoven wool mat. Catnip plant height was significantly greater in the oat straw than the other treatments at 4 wk through 6 wk in 2001; at 4 to 8 wk in 2002, catnip plant height and width was significantly lower in the negative control compared with the other treatments. Catnip yield was significantly higher in the flax straw mat than all other treatments in 2001. In 2002, St. John\u27s wort yields were not statistically different in any treatments. All weed management treatments had significantly fewer weeds than the non-weeded rows in 2002. Total weed density comparisons in each crop from 2 yr showed fewer weeds present in the flax straw and wool mat treatments compared with positive control plots. There was no significant weed management treatment effect on the concentration of the target compounds, nepetalactone in catnip and pseudohypericin–hypericin in St. John\u27s wort, although there was a trend toward higher concentrations in the flax straw treatment

    Measurement Properties of the Motivation for Youth Treatment Scale with a Residential Group Home Population

    Get PDF
    A client’s motivation to receive services has long been identified as a highly relevant component of mental health treatment. In fact, ample evidence demonstrates that client motivation is significantly related to seeking services, remaining in services, and improved client outcomes (e.g., Broome, Joe, & Simpson, 2001; Ryan, Plant, & O’Malley, 1995; Schroder, Sellman, Frampton, & Deering, 2009). Additionally, it has been recognized that motivation is a “dynamic” characteristic that changes throughout treatment (Melnick, De Leon, Hawke, Jainchill, & Kressel, 1997; Schroder et al., 2009). In this way, motivation is an important client factor to assess and monitor throughout the treatment process. The broad construct of motivation is comprised of two separate, but related components conceptualized as motivation to change and motivation for treatment. As defined by DiClamente, Schlundt, and Gemmell (2004), motivation to change refers to a willingness to recognize problematic behavior and take steps toward change, whereas motivation for treatment refers to a willingness to seek help and remain compliant with an intervention program. In other words, a motivated person not only perceives the importance of changing, but also has confidence that they are able to be successful at making the change (Burke, Arkowitz, & Menchola, 2003)

    The Effect of Natural Mulches on Crop Performance, Weed Suppression and Biochemical Constituents of Catnip and St. John's Wort

    Get PDF
    Because of expanding markets for high-value niche crops, opportunities have increased for the production of medicinal herbs in the USA. An experiment was conducted in 2001 and 2002 near Gilbert, IA, to study crop performance, weed suppression, and environmental conditions associated with the use of several organic mulches in the production of two herbs, catnip (Nepeta cataria L.) and St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L. ‘Helos’). Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design and included a positive (hand-weeded) control, a negative (nonweeded) control, oat straw, a flax straw mat, and a nonwoven wool mat. Catnip plant height was significantly greater in the oat straw than the other treatments at 4 wk through 6 wk in 2001; at 4 to 8 wk in 2002, catnip plant height and width was significantly lower in the negative control compared with the other treatments. Catnip yield was significantly higher in the flax straw mat than all other treatments in 2001. In 2002, St. John's wort yields were not statistically different in any treatments. All weed management treatments had significantly fewer weeds than the non-weeded rows in 2002. Total weed density comparisons in each crop from 2 yr showed fewer weeds present in the flax straw and wool mat treatments compared with positive control plots. There was no significant weed management treatment effect on the concentration of the target compounds, nepetalactone in catnip and pseudohypericin–hypericin in St. John's wort, although there was a trend toward higher concentrations in the flax straw treatment.This is a manuscript of an article published as Duppong, L. M., K. Delate, M. Liebman, R. Horton, F. Romero, G. Kraus, J. Petrich, and P. K. Chowdbury. "The effect of natural mulches on crop performance, weed suppression and biochemical constituents of catnip and St. John's wort." Crop Science 44, no. 3 (2004): 861-869. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.8610. Posted with permission.</p
    corecore