Applying ROOTT implant system in the upper jaw

Introduction:The application of the implants and their success largely depends on a well-made plan. Before implanting, you should have a vision of the final result of the intervention. In dental practices we use more types of implants. ROOTT system of implants has larger application in everyday dental practice, owing to its simple way of working and easy acceptance by patients. Objective: A case study of application of two types implants from the ROOTT system in the upper jaw. Case: Patient age 40 appears in the practice with pain in the girders of the old bridge construction and expressed luxation of the teeth and the construction. A panoramic picture was made and a final decision was adopted on the extraction of carriers and implementation of implants. In this case we used seven implants the type of basal and compression implant depending on the condition of the bone. In the same day an imprint was taken for the metal-ceramic fixed construction. A control panoramic picture was made after one week with the implied implants and a test in metal for the future construction was also made. After 4 days the fixed construction was set. The patient is still monitored and comes to regular checks and after 6 months a control recording will be made to see the state of the implants. Conclusion: The use of implants of the ROOTT system provides visible results depending on the situation of the patient and greatly simple application is acceptable by the patients

Applying ROOTT implant system directly after extraction of teeth

Introduction: ROOTT implant system consists of three types of implants and depending on the need and the condition of the bone the appropriate type of implant is applied. The implants have superior osteointegration and you can immediately apply them after the extraction of teeth. Of great importance is the selection of appropriate patient that would respond to treatment with implants, and of course the choice of the implant by the therapist. The application of ROOTT implants directly after the extraction of the teeth is a good choice and simple one for patients because it shortens their visits and on the other hand excellent results are obtained. Aim: Application of ROOTT implants immediately after extraction of teeth and their prosthetic load. Case report: Patient, 45 years old appears in the practice with a desire for fix prosthetic compensation on the left side in the upper jaw. A review was made and a plan for therapy by applying implants that will be further bearers of the planned bridge construction. In the next visit the gangrenous radixes 23 and 24 were extracted and two implants were placed at the point on 24th and 25th. In the same visit the imprint is taken for making fixed bridge construction. After a week a trial of sample in metal was made and new orthopantomographyc image was taken that showed excellent integration on the implants. After two days a fixed bridge structure is set and the patient is still monitored and he has an excellent condition of his teeth. After six months new consultation is scheduled and also new orthopantomographyc image to check the condition of the bone and the implants. Conclusion: Implantation after extraction is simple procedure, affordable by patients, fast and significantly shortens the time of visit

Implication of the ROOTT OPEN IMPLANT system at a complete lack of teeth

Introduction: The most common indication for application of implants is the total lack of teeth in order to obtain a stable fixed prosthetic construction which will result in maximum aesthetic and functional effect. ROOTT IMPLANT system is simple to use and offers good solutions that is supported by reliable therapeutic cases. As such, it offers three types of implants depending on the function that has to be performed and the condition of the teeth. Objective: Application of ROOTT IMPLANT system in total lack of teeth in the lower jaw. Case: Patient at age 65 with total lack of teeth in the lower jaw and mobile denture in the upper jaw that has been done several years ago was received. An orthopantomographic picture and plan appropriate to the condition of the mandible were made. In accordance with the results of the measurements it is decided to be applied insertion of 6 implants of compressive type of implants in order to be burdened prostheticaly. Placing the implants was done in one visit of the patient and an imprint for making metal-ceramic construction was also taken. A control panoramic image with the already implied implants was made and a good osteo-integration was noticed on the image. The patient is scheduled for seven days to make the metal sample for the fixed structure, and after two days a finished metal-ceramic construction was given. The patient is observed in certain intervals, and there are no visible changes. Conclusion: The use of compressive implants from the ROOTT IMPLANT system is simple for the therapist and the patient and it offers good results. The patient is monitored and there is visible excellent osteo-integration of the implants, and there is a re-scedueled control after 6 months

Maintenance of oral hygiene of dental implants

Introduction: Proper medical approach to loss of teeth is by placing dental implants. They allow transmission of chewing pressure in bone tissue and thus stimulate the regeneration of bone after the loss of teeth. Bad oral hygiene is the most common cause of complications after implantation Aim: Maintaining oral hygiene after the installation of dental implants is of great importance for the success of the implantation. Materials and methods: In the period from year to year and a half after the burden on the implants as the most common complication of poor oral hygiene is periimplantitis. Therefore the training of the patient for maintaining oral hygiene is crucial. Check-ups are scheduled for 3 to 6 months and later on, when the patient will develop the technique of maintaining oral hygiene these check-ups can be performed once a year. Regular brushing of the teeth i.e. of the prosthetic construction, flossing and antiseptic solvents for teeth at home is necessary as an imperative. We recommended that patients use tough antiseptics such as chlorhexidine, Listerine, Septodont and others. Smoking as a risk factor is excluded before placing the implants. The removal of soft deposits, rinsing with antiseptic was done by the therapist at every checkup and the state of the soft tissues around the implants was monitored as well as the osteointegration. The way to maintain oral hygiene is controlled and further instructions are provided. Results: After the regular check-ups on 3 months, 6 months and a year at these patients with already placed implants we noticed oral hygiene on a very high level according to our instructions and that is one of the main things that the procedure of imaplanting depends on. Conclusion: The good side is that the implant cannot be spoiled as natural tooth, but if proper oral hygiene is not maintained there is a risk of developing an infection and loss of the implant