3 research outputs found

    МетодИ оцінкИ центральноЇ гемодИнамікИ прИ інгаляціЙніЙ анестезіЇ У пацієнтіВ З тиреотоксикозоМ

    Full text link
    Проведено оцінку центральної гемодинаміки інтраопераційно за допомогою інвазивних/неінвазивних методів та розрахункових формул у пацієнтів з тиреотоксикозом на тлі застосування інгаляційної мінімально-потокової анестезії при виконанні тиреоїдектомій. Розрахункові показники за даними формул Старра, Лілье-Штрандера и Цандера занижують, а за патентом RU №2481785 мають завищені показники хвилинного об'єму кровобігу, серцевого індексу у порівнянні із інструментальними способами оцінк

    Vascular injury during lumbar discectomy: risk factors, diagnosis, methods of surgical correction, features of anaesthetic management and intensive care

    No full text
    One of the priority tasks in neurosurgery is to reduce the frequency of postoperative complications and mortality. Lumbar discectomy is the most frequently performed intervention in spinal neurosurgery and it is a fairly safe procedure. One of the possible intraoperative surgical complications, that threatens the patient’s life is vascular injury. The first clinical case of damage to the large vessels during discectomy was described in 1945. It is believed that the frequency of this complication is 1‒5 cases per 10,000 surgical interventions, but the literature notes that these figures may be significantly underestimated. Some authors indicate that the frequency of this complication, despite the development of surgical techniques over the past 50 years, has not significantly decreased, so it is important for surgeons to be informed and alert about the possibility of such a problem. Among the factors that significantly increase the risk of vascular damage congenital, acquired and technical are determined. Variability of clinical symptoms of damage to lagre vessels is due to different localization of injury, type (arterial, venous or combined) and scale of vascular disaster. For each level of surgical intervention, the "most typical" vessel damage is identified. Vascular injury during discectomy can occur according to three clinical and pathomorphological scenarios: manifestation of vessel rupture symptoms, arteriovenous fistula or a pseudoaneurysm formation. According to different authors, the frequency of these findings varies significantly. This review examines the symptoms of possible variants of vascular damage development during discectomy and describes the characteristics of surgical correction methods. Along with clarifying the location and variant of vascular damage, the critical thing is assessing the amount of blood loss and the rate of ongoing bleeding. In the case of suspected massive bleeding, the paramount importance is the involvement of additional medical personnel for the surgical haemostasis and providing sufficient blood for haemotransfusions. In case of a vascular accident, the key requirement for adequate anaesthetic management is the maintenance of permissive arterial hypotension until the moment of surgical haemostasis. Targeted treatment of haemorrhagic shock in case of damage to large vessels consists of rapid haemostatic resuscitation including blood components and products in a balanced 1:1:1 ratio, such as plasma, red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and coagulation factors. In Ukraine, obtaining a sufficient amount of blood components and products (according to the protocol of massive haemotransfusion) in case of unpredicted blood loss is a difficult task, therefore, in the absence of certain components or blood products, whole blood can be used as an alternative. The number and severity of complications and outcomes primarily depend on the efficiency and timeliness of blood transfusions, along with the speed of surgical arrest of bleeding. This publication describes in detail the main points of management of patients with massive bleeding according to modern international standards and Ukraine regulatory documents

    Current Conception About the Pathogenesis and Intensive Care of Severe COVID-19 (Review)

    Full text link
    The aim of the research. The aim of this work was to summarize the scientific literature data on the pathogenesis and intensive care of the severe course of coronavirus infection. Materials and methods. Databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web Of Science 2020-2021 were used for literary searches. Results. An intense inflammatory response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in COVID-19 patients causes a cytokine storm and hypercoagulability with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ failure. Approximately 17 % to 35 % of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are treated in the intensive care unit, most often due to hypoxemic respiratory failure and the development of ARDS, and between 29 % and 91 % of patients in intensive care units require invasive ventilation. In addition to acute respiratory failure, hospitalized patients may have acute renal failure (9 %), liver dysfunction (19 %), coagulation disorders (10 %–25 %), and septic shock (6 %). More than 75 % of hospitalized patients require additional oxygen therapy. Respiratory support could vary from the need for oxygen supplementation through a nasal catheter to invasive ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with the most severe ARDS. The uncontrolled inflammation and coagulation seen in COVID-19 patients is similar to multifactorial ARDS, where a plethora of evidence has demonstrated the ability of long-term corticosteroid therapy (CST) to reduce inflammation-coagulation-fibroproliferation and accelerate recovery. With regard to the assessment of the benefits of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with elevated D-dimer, the question has not yet been finally resolved, and research devoted to this is still ongoing. Conclusions. The approaches to respiratory, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 require further research to determine the optimal treatment tactic
    corecore