Precurved non-tunnelled catheters for haemodialysis are comparable in terms of infections and malfunction as compared to tunnelled catheters: A retrospective cohort study

Background: The main limitations of central venous catheters for haemodialysis access are infections and catheter malfunction. Our objective was to assess whether precurved non-tunnelled central venous catheters are comparable to tunnelled central venous catheters in terms of infection and catheter malfunction and to assess whether precurved non-tunnelled catheters are superior to straight catheters. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, adult patients in whom a central venous catheter for haemodialysis was inserted between 2012 and 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint consisting of the first occurrence of either an infection or catheter malfunction. The secondary endpoint was a combined endpoint of the removal of the central venous catheter due to either an infection or a catheter malfunction. Using multivariable analysis, cause-specific hazard ratios for endpoints were calculated for tunnelled catheter versus precurved non-tunnelled catheter, tunnelled catheter versus non-tunnelled catheter, and precurved versus straight nontunnelled catheter. Results: A total of 1603 patients were included. No difference in reaching the primary endpoint was seen between tunnelled catheters, compared to precurved non-tunnelled catheters (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.70– 1.19, p=0.48). Tunnelled catheters were removed less often, compared to precurved non-tunnelled catheters (hazard ratio, 0.65; 9

Effects of acute and chronic angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition by spirapril on cardiovascular regulation in essential hypertensive patients : assessment by spectral analysis and haemodynamic measurements

Contains fulltext : 23786.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Magnesium in chronic haemodialysis (MAGIC-HD): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to determine feasibility and safety of using increased dialysate magnesium concentrations to increase plasma magnesium concentrations in people treated with haemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: People treated with haemodialysis are at increased risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Plasma magnesium concentration has been inversely associated with these risks. Therefore, plasma magnesium may be a new modifiable risk factor and an increase of dialysate magnesium concentration may be an easy, safe and effective way to increase plasma magnesium concentrations. Detailed information on modulating dialysate magnesium concentrations is limited in literature. Primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and feasibility to increase plasma magnesium concentrations in people treated with haemodialysis by means of sequentially increasing concentration of magnesium in the dialysate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised double-blinded standard of care controlled trial, 53 persons treated with haemodialysis will be randomly allocated 2:1 to either a stepwise individually titrated increase of dialysate magnesium concentration from 0.50 to 0.75 to 1.00 mmol/L during 8 weeks, or a standard dialysate magnesium concentration of 0.50 mmol/L. Other study measurements include dietary records, questionnaires, ECG, Holter registration and pulse wave velocity. The primary endpoint is predialysis plasma magnesium after the long interdialytic interval at the end of week 8. In addition, the predictive effect of dialysate magnesium concentration and other baseline parameters and dialysis characteristics on plasma magnesium concentration will be explored using linear mixed models. Safety endpoint is defined by the occurrence of hypermagnesemia above 1.25 mmol/L, or bradycardia or prolonged QTc interval detected on the ECG. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2013 and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Centre. The results of the study will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentation at national or international conferences in the field of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6568/NL6393