8 research outputs found

    Study areas.

    No full text
    <p>Map showing the three villages where the study was conducted (Kivukoni, Minepa and Mavimba) in rural Ulanga district, southeastern Tanzania.</p

    Main stages in the process of crowdsourcing vector surveillance.

    No full text
    <p>Illustration of the five main steps when crowdsourcing for community knowledge and experiences to predict or approximate densities and distribution of outdoor-biting mosquitoes.</p

    Comparison of mosquito catches in areas classified by communities as having high, medium or low mosquito densities in dry season and wet season.

    No full text
    <p>Median nightly mosquito catches in areas marked by community members as having high mosquito densities, medium densities or low densities in all villages during wet season (upper panel), and dry season (lower panel). Data segregated by taxa, but combined over 12 months. The error bars in this graph represent the inter-quartile ranges, i.e. 25<sup>th</sup> percentile and 75<sup>th</sup> percentile on either side of the median nightly catch. Data for the wet season included months of December, January, February, March, April and May, while the dry season data included June, July, August, September, October and November.</p

    The M-Trap.

    No full text
    <p>Pictures of the odour-baited trap, the M-trap, used for comparative assessment of mosquito densities. Vertical envelope-shaped mosquito entry points are labelled. In our study, no human volunteer occupied the trap, and instead we relied on synthetic mosquito attractants complemented with carbon-dioxide gas.</p
    corecore