Social cognition and treatment in psychosis

In dit proefschrift wordt onderzoek gedaan naar sociale cognitie en de behandeling van metacognitie bij mensen met een psychotische kwetsbaarheid. Met sociale cognitie wordt bedoeld: de mentale operaties die ten grondslag liggen aan sociale interacties. Met metacognitie wordt verwezen naar het proces van reflecteren op de eigen gedachten en gevoelens en die van anderen. Uit ons onderzoek komt naar voren dat sociale cognitie al verminderd is vóór het ontstaan van een eerste psychose. Aangezien sociale cognitie invloed heeft op sociaal functioneren en daarmee op de mentale gezondheid, is het van groot belang om sociale cognitie te verbeteren bij mensen die het risico lopen op een psychose. Empathie, een onderdeel van sociale cognitie, blijkt verminderd bij mensen die een psychose hebben gehad. Ze hebben meer moeite met het lezen van expressieve gezichten in vergelijking met gezonde personen. Uit eerder onderzoek komt naar voren dat metacognitie verminderd is bij mensen met een psychotische kwetsbaarheid. We onderzochten een nieuwe therapie die metacognitie wil verbeteren (MERIT therapie) op effectiviteit in een ‘randomized controlled trial’. De mensen in de behandelingsgroep lieten een verbetering in metacognitie zien, een half jaar na de therapie, in vergelijking met de mensen die reguliere behandeling kregen. MERIT is een intensieve therapie en is daarom niet de eerste keus voor behandeling voor elke patiënt, maar het is mogelijk wel nuttig voor specifieke groepen patiënten die niet reageren op standaard, korte therapieën

A manual-based individual therapy to improve metacognition in schizophrenia:protocol of a multi-center RCT

BACKGROUND: Metacognitive dysfunction has been widely recognized as a feature of schizophrenia. As it is linked with deficits in several aspects of daily life functioning, improvement of metacognition may lead to improvement in functioning. Individual psychotherapy might be a useful form of treatment to improve metacognition in patients with schizophrenia; multiple case reports and a pilot study show promising results. The present study aims to measure the effectiveness of an individual, manual-based therapy (Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy, MERIT) in improving metacognition in patients with schizophrenia. We also want to examine if improvement in metacognitive abilities is correlated with improvements in aspects of daily life functioning namely social functioning, experience of symptoms, quality of life, depression, work readiness, insight and experience of stigma. METHODS/DESIGN: MERIT is currently evaluated in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Thirteen therapists in six mental health institutions in the Netherlands participate in this study. Patients are randomly assigned to either MERIT or the control condition: treatment as usual (TAU). DISCUSSION: If proven effective, MERIT can be a useful addition to the care for schizophrenia patients. The design brings along some methodological difficulties, these issues are addressed in the discussion of this paper. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN16659871

Empathy and Its Relationship With Social Functioning in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis

Introduction: Social functioning is often impaired in the ultra-high-risk (UHR) phase of psychosis. There is some evidence that empathy is also impaired in this phase and that these impairments may underlie difficulties in social functioning. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether cognitive and affective empathy are lower in people in the UHR phase of psychosis in comparison to healthy controls, and whether possible impairments have the same magnitude as in people with schizophrenia. A second aim was to examine whether there is a relationship between empathy and social functioning in individuals in the UHR phase. Method: Forty-three individuals at UHR for psychosis, 92 people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and 49 persons without a psychiatric disorder completed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE), and Faux Pas as instruments to measure empathy. The Time Use survey was used to measure social functioning. MAN(C)OVA was used to analyse differences between groups on empathy and social functioning, and correlations were calculated between empathy measures and social functioning for each group. Results: The UHR group presented significantly lower levels of self-reported cognitive empathy than the healthy controls, but not compared to patients with SSD, while performance-based cognitive empathy was unimpaired in the UHR group. On the affective measures, we found that people with UHR and patients with SSD had significantly higher levels of self-reported distress in interpersonal settings compared to healthy controls. In the UHR group, perspective-taking was negatively associated with time spent on structured social activities. In the SSD group, we found that structured social activities were positively associated with perspective-taking and negatively associated with personal distress in interactions with others. Lastly, in people without mental illness, social activities were positively associated with performance-based perspective-taking. Conclusion: Impairments in subjective cognitive empathy appear to be present in the UHR phase, suggesting that difficulties in interpreting the thoughts and feelings of others precede the onset of psychotic disorders. This can inform future interventions in the UHR phase

F105. Measuring Empathy in Schizophrenia: The Empathic Accuracy Task and Its Correlation With Other Empathy Measures

Background Empathy is a complex interpersonal process thought to be impaired in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Past studies have mainly used questionnaires or performance-based tasks with static cues to measure cognitive and affective empathy. In contrast, we used an Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) designed to capture the more dynamic aspects of empathy by using video clips in which perceivers continuously judge emotionally charged stories of various targets. We compared individuals with schizophrenia to healthy controls on the EAT and assessed correlations among the EAT and three other commonly used empathy tasks. Methods Patients (n=92) and healthy controls (n=42) matched for age and education, completed the EAT, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and the Faux Pas task. Differences between groups were analyzed and correlations were calculated between empathy measurement instruments. Results The groups differed in EAT performance, with controls outperforming patients. A moderating effect was found for the emotional expressivity of the target: while both patients and controls scored low when judging targets with low expressivity, controls performed better than patients with more expressive targets. Though there were also group differences on the cognitive and affective empathy questionnaires (with lower scores for patients in comparison to controls), EAT performance did not correlate with questionnaire scores. Reduced empathy performance did not seem to be part of a generalized cognitive deficit, as differences between patients and controls on general cognition was not significant. Discussion Individuals with schizophrenia benefit less from the emotional expressivity of other people than controls, which contributes to their impaired empathic accuracy. The lack of correlation between the EAT and the questionnaires suggests a distinction between self-report empathy and actual empathy performance. To explore empathic difficulties in real life, it is important to use instruments that take the interpersonal perspective into account

Self-stigma and cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis

BackgroundImpaired cognitive insight and increased self-stigma have been consistently reported in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but little is known about its presence in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing a psychosis, although self-stigma is associated with transition.to psychosis. The current study examined whether self-stigma is already present in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis, and whether this is associated with impaired cognitive insight.Methods184 participants were recruited divided over three groups, namely individuals diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD; n = 92, 34% females), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR; n = 43, 59% females) and general population controls (GPC; n = 49, 27% females). All participants completed assessments on demographic information (gender, age, education), and cognitive insight. In addition, participants with SSD and individuals at UHR completed a questionnaire on self-stigma.ResultsThe level of self-stigma did not differ between individuals at UHR and individuals diagnosed with SSD. Cognitive insight also did not differ significantly between the three groups, but the subscale self-reflection differed between the three groups [F(2,184) = 4.20, p = 0.02], with the UHR and SSD groups showing more self-reflection. Pearson’s correlation analyses showed that in individuals at UHR total cognitive insight and its self-reflection subscale were significantly associated with the alienation subscale of self-stigma, and in individuals with SSD self-certainty subscale of cognitive insight was significantly associated with stereotype endorsement.ConclusionFindings show that self-stigma was already present in the UHR phase, to a similar degree as in individuals with a diagnosis of a SSD, and is thus not dependent of previous experience of having a label of SSD. Cognitive insight in individuals at UHR of psychosis appears to be intact, but individuals at UHR showed more self-reflectiveness, and individuals at risk with high cognitive insight also experience high levels of self-stigma. Overall findings from our study suggest that pre-emptive interventions targeting self-stigma, while considering cognitive insight, are needed early on in manifestation of psychotic illness, preferably already in the UHR phase

Investigating the relationship between specific negative symptoms and metacognitive functioning in psychosis: a systematic review

Background: Disrupted metacognition is implicated in development and maintenance of negative symptoms, but more fine-grained analyses would inform precise treatment targeting for individual negative symptoms. Aims: This systematic review identifies and examines datasets that test whether specific metacognitive capacities distinctly influence negative symptoms. Materials and Methods: PsycINFO, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane Library databases plus hand searching of relevant articles, journals and grey literature identified quantitative research investigating negative symptoms and metacognition in adults aged 16+ with psychosis. Authors of included articles were contacted to identify unique datasets and missing information. Data were extracted for a risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Results: 85 published reports met criteria and are estimated to reflect 32 distinct datasets and 1623 unique participants. The data indicated uncertainty about the relationship between summed scores of negative symptoms and domains of metacognition, with significant findings indicating correlation coefficients from 0.88 to −0.23. Only eight studies investigated the relationship between metacognition and individual negative symptoms, with mixed findings. Studies were mostly moderate-to-low risk of bias. Discussion: The relationship between negative symptoms and metacognition is rarely the focus of studies reviewed here, and negative symptom scores are often summed. This approach may obscure relationships between metacognitive domains and individual negative symptoms which may be important for understanding how negative symptoms are developed and maintained. Conclusion: Methodological challenges around overlapping participants, variation in aggregation of negative symptom items and types of analyses used, make a strong case for use of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis to further elucidate these relationships