Relationship between average number of delay and minimum number of jump for EP (left figure) and EPWP with <i>β</i>₁ = 0.5 (right figure) on networks with 500 nodes.

<p>Relationship between average number of delay and minimum number of jump for EP (left figure) and EPWP with <i>β</i>₁ = 0.5 (right figure) on networks with 500 nodes.</p

Relationship between H⁽²⁾ and R for different routing strategy on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Relationship between H⁽²⁾ and R for different routing strategy on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).</p

Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for EP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for EP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).</p

Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for SP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for SP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).</p

Simulation results for three priorities of packets with same distribution probabilities on network with 1000 nodes.

<p>Simulation results for three priorities of packets with same distribution probabilities on network with 1000 nodes.</p

Relationship between average number of delay and minimum number of jump for EP (left figure) and EPWP with <i>β</i>₁ = 0.5 (right figure) on networks with 1000 nodes.

<p>Relationship between average number of delay and minimum number of jump for EP (left figure) and EPWP with <i>β</i>₁ = 0.5 (right figure) on networks with 1000 nodes.</p

Relationship between average number of jump and minimum number of jump for different routing strategies on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Relationship between average number of jump and minimum number of jump for different routing strategies on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).</p

Relationship between H and R for different routing strategy on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Black lines with circular marker and pentagram marker denote the order parameter of SP and EP routing strategy, respectively. Lines with other colors besides black denote the order parameter of EPWP routing strategy with different value of <i>β</i>₁.</p

Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for EP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).

<p>Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for EP on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure).</p

Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for different routing strategies on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure) in high traffic case.

<p>Relationship between average buffer size and node degree for different routing strategies on networks with 500 nodes (left figure) and 1000 nodes (right figure) in high traffic case.</p