11 research outputs found

    Viral response in relationship with Vitamin D Pathway Functional Alleles (VDPFA).

    No full text
    <div><p><b><i>Panel </i><i>A</i></b> Rates of rapid viral response (RVR), complete early viral response (cEVR), end of treatment viral response (EOT) and sustained viral response (SVR) in relationship with the number of Vitamin D Pathway Functional Alleles (VDPFA) carried. Data refer to all patients. Statistical analysis was performed by means of chi-square test for linear trend.</p> <p><b><i>Panel </i><i>B</i></b> Rates of rapid viral response (RVR), complete early viral response (cEVR), end of treatment viral response (EOT) and sustained viral response (SVR) in relationship with the number of Vitamin D Pathway Functional Alleles (VDPFA) carried. Data refer to difficult to treat HCV genotypes. Statistical analysis was performed by means of chi-square test for linear trend.</p></div

    Effect of Vitamin D Pathway Functional Alleles (VDPFA) on antiviral response in RVR negative patients.

    No full text
    <p>Rates of sustained viral response (SVR) in patients not achieving rapid viral response (RVR negative) in relationship with the number of Vitamin D Pathway Functional Alleles (VDPFA) carried. Statistical analysis was performed by means of chi-square test for linear trend.</p

    Number of co-medications used and percentage of patients, by DAA regimen, among HCV-infected patients.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Patients with mild liver disease. (B) Patients with moderate-to severe-liver disease. SOF/RBV: sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, SOF/SIM: sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, SOF/DCV: sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, SOF/LDV: sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, 3D: paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir. The percentage of patients who took one drug (in blu), two drugs (in red), three drugs (in green) and more than 3 drugs (in violet) are reported considering the total number of patients reported for each regimen in both Fig 1A and Fig 1B at the same manner.</p

    Category of potential DDIs, by DAA regimen and severity of liver disease, among HCV-infected patients.

    No full text
    <p>Comedication used in patients with mild liver disease (A) or in (B) patients with moderate-to severe-liver disease (B). DAA regiments and number of comedications used are shown. SOF/RBV: sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, SOF/SIM: sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, SOF/DCV: sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, SOF/LDV: sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, 3D: paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir. Category 0: Classification not possible due to lack of information; Category 1: No clinical interaction possible; Category 2: May require dose adjustment/closer monitoring.</p

    Univariate and logistic regression analysis linking failure with independent variables.

    No full text
    <p>Univariate and logistic regression analysis linking failure with independent variables.</p

    Failure rates following the first DAA regimen, by HCV genotype and treatment regimen in patients who completed the 12 weeks post treatment evaluation (n = 3,830 patients).

    No full text
    <p>Failure rates following the first DAA regimen, by HCV genotype and treatment regimen in patients who completed the 12 weeks post treatment evaluation (n = 3,830 patients).</p

    Characteristics of the study patients according to SVR following the first DAA treatment.

    No full text
    <p>Characteristics of the study patients according to SVR following the first DAA treatment.</p
    corecore