The relation between, metabolic syndrome and quality of life in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is associated to an increased prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome (MeS) and to a reduction of Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between MeS and QoL in SLE.SLE patients were consecutively enrolled in a cross sectional study. MeS was defined according to IFD definition. Therapy with glucocorticoids (GC) and antimalarial was analyzed as cumulative years of exposure. We used a cut off of 7.5 mg of prednisone to define high daily dose of GC. QoL was quantified using SF-36. We used BDI and HAM-H to assess symptoms of mood disorders. Fatigue was evaluated using Facit-Fatigue, physical activity using IPAQ, sleep quality using PSQI and alexithymia using TAS-20.We enrolled 100 SLE patients. MeS prevalence was 34%. Patients with MeS presented reduced scores in SF-36 MCS and PCS compared to patients without MeS (p 0.03 and p 0.004). BDI and HAM-H score were significantly higher in patients meeting MeS criteria compared to subjects without MeS (p 0.004, p 0.02). These results were confirmed after adjustment for confounders. Compared to patients without MeS, those with MeS presented higher age, lower education level, higher recent SELENA-SLEDAI, higher number of flares, increased SDI, longer cumulative exposure to high dose GC and shorter duration of antimalarial therapy. In the multiple logistic regression model, the variable associated to the Odds Ratio of having MeS were: the average of recent SELENA-SLEDAI (OR 1.15 p 0.04), the years of exposure to high dose of GC (OR 1.18 p 0.004), the years of exposure to antimalarials (OR 0.82 p 0.03) and the BDI score (OR 1.1 p 0.005).A modern management of SLE should not miss to take all the possible measures to ensure an adequate QoL to SLE patients, with particular attention to those affected by MeS

Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. stress vulnerability, resilience and mood disturbances in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic severely increased the stress levels in the population. The aim of present study was to investigate the impact of the lockdown measures on emotional well-being and disease activity in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through a telemedicine approach. Methods: An on-line survey, including demographic characteristics, disease-activity and psychometric scales (Stress-related Vulnerability Scale, Resiliency scale), Zung Anxiety and Depression Self-assessment Scale), was anonymously administered to FM, RA and healthy controls (HC). Disease activities were compared to the pre-lockdown cohort referring to our centre. Results: Levels of anxiety and depression worthy of psychiatric attention were documented in 36.7% of FM, 14.6% of RA, 12.5% of HC and in 50% of FM, 17.1% of RA, 15% of HC, respectively. HC featured the highest stress scores, followed FM and then RA. RA showed higher resiliency than FM. Both anxiety and depression scores were significantly higher in FM than RA and HC. Disease severity was higher in RA patients and lower in FM patients when compared to the respective historical cohorts. Conclusions: Lockdown significantly affected emotional well-being and disease activity of patients suffering from rheumatic diseases. While HC showed a higher vulnerability to stress, RA patients showed a greater resilience compared to both HC and to FM patients, especially. Emotional disturbances are greater in patients with RDs and in particular with FM. The use of a telemedicine approach to screen for severe symptoms represents a useful addition to the overall management of rheumatic patients.Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic severely increased the stress levels in the population. The aim of present study was to investigate the impact of the lockdown measures on emotional well-being and disease activity in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through a telemedicine approach. Methods: An on-line survey, including demographic characteristics, disease-activity and psychometric scales (Stress-related Vulnerability Scale, Resiliency scale), Zung Anxiety and Depression Self-assessment Scale), was anonymously administered to FM, RA and healthy controls (HC). Disease activities were compared to the pre-lockdown cohort referring to our centre. Results: Levels of anxiety and depression worthy of psychiatric attention were documented in 36.7% of FM, 14.6% of RA, 12.5% of HC and in 50% of FM, 17.1% of RA, 15% of HC, respectively. HC featured the highest stress scores, followed FM and then RA. RA showed higher resiliency than FM. Both anxiety and depression scores were significantly higher in FM than RA and HC. Disease severity was higher in RA patients and lower in FM patients when compared to the respective historical cohorts. Conclusions: Lockdown significantly affected emotional well-being and disease activity of patients suffering from rheumatic diseases. While HC showed a higher vulnerability to stress, RA patients showed a greater resilience compared to both HC and to FM patients, especially. Emotional disturbances are greater in patients with RDs and in particular with FM. The use of a telemedicine approach to screen for severe symptoms represents a useful addition to the overall management of rheumatic patients

Gender differences in the revised fibromyalgia Impact questionnaire. a pilot study

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic syndrome characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain associated with symptoms such as fatigue, sleep disturbances and cognitive impairment. Prevalence is higher in females but the application of the 2010/2011 and 2016 revision of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria reduced prevalence differences and the actual female:male ratio is approximately 3:1. Even if lately some studies have been conducted regarding FM gender differences, disease severity is still assessed using questionnaires, such as the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), designed and validated through a predominantly female sample. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the 21 items of the FIQR among male and female patients in order to evaluate the possible existence of a gender bias. Methods In this case-control study, consecutive patients with a diagnosis of FM (2016 ACR criteria) were asked to answer an online survey, including demographic characteristics, disease variables and the Italian version of the FIQR. Among the 544 patients that compiled the questionnaire, 78 patients, 39 males and 39 females, matched for age and disease duration, were consecutively enrolled in order to compare their FIQR scores. Results The univariate analysis showed that total FIQR scores and physical function domain scores were significantly higher in females and, among the 21 items of the FIQR, the female group obtained significantly higher scores in 6 of them. Our results showed that female patients obtain significantly higher scores in the FIQR total score and physical function domain score, in particular in 5 out of the 9 sub-items of the FIQR physical function domain. Conclusion These preliminary results indicate that the use of the FIQR as a severity index in male patients probably underestimates the disease impact in this group

Gender influence on clinical manifestations, depressive symptoms and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels in patients affected by fibromyalgia

Introduction: OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common rheumatic disorder characterized by chronic, widespread pain associated with several not painful symptoms. The contribution of gender to the manifestation of the disease may influence the higher prevalence of FM among women. In spite of this, how patients' gender influences the clinical manifestation of FM is still not well understood. The frequent association with neuropsychiatric symptoms raised the attention on the role of neurotrophins, including the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as potential biomarkers of the condition. Aims of the study were to evaluate the influence of gender on clinical manifestations and to investigate BDNF serum levels as a potential biomarker of FM. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 201 adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with FM. For each patient, we collected clinical and clinimetric data and, in a subgroup of 40 patients, we measured serum BDNF levels. BDNF levels have been measured also in 40 matched healthy controls (HC). Results: Several symptoms were significantly higher in women compared with men, including pain, fatigue, memory problems, tenderness, balance problems and sensitivity to environmental stimuli. On the contrary, men reported a significant higher frequency of coexisting depressive symptoms. BDNF levels were significantly lower in FM patients compared with HC, discriminating with good accuracy the condition. Conclusion: Gender influences FM clinical manifestations, with a higher prevalence of pain, fatigue and other common FM symptoms among women while higher frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms among men. BDNF offers promises as a potential biomarker of the disease. Key Points • Gender-related differences in the clinical manifestations of FM may contribute to the higher prevalence of FM among females. Indeed, women show higher levels of pain and symptoms traditionally associated to FM, which are evaluated to establish the diagnosis according to the clinical criteria. • The new insights into the pathogenesis of the disease raised the attention on the role of brain mediators in FM. Among these, BNDF shows potential as a diagnostic biomarker

Multinomial regression model (dependent variable: quartiles of MCS and PCS values; upper quartile vs lower quartiles).

<p>Analysis of variables associated to MCS and PCS in SLE.</p

Analysis categorical variable SLE-related and QoL–related in patients with and without MeS.

<p>Analysis categorical variable SLE-related and QoL–related in patients with and without MeS.</p

Multiple logistic regression analysis investigating the effects of SLE-related parameters and QoL-related parameters on MeS.

<p>Multiple logistic regression analysis investigating the effects of SLE-related parameters and QoL-related parameters on MeS.</p

MeS parameters according to IFD definition.

<p>MeS parameters according to IFD definition.</p

Least-squares means of SF-36 components in patients with and without MeS.

<p>Least-squares means of SF-36 components in patients with and without MeS.</p

Relation between sedentary behavior and physical activity.

<p>Relation between sedentary behavior and physical activity.</p