147 research outputs found
Optimal Parameter Choices Through Self-Adjustment: Applying the 1/5-th Rule in Discrete Settings
While evolutionary algorithms are known to be very successful for a broad
range of applications, the algorithm designer is often left with many
algorithmic choices, for example, the size of the population, the mutation
rates, and the crossover rates of the algorithm. These parameters are known to
have a crucial influence on the optimization time, and thus need to be chosen
carefully, a task that often requires substantial efforts. Moreover, the
optimal parameters can change during the optimization process. It is therefore
of great interest to design mechanisms that dynamically choose best-possible
parameters. An example for such an update mechanism is the one-fifth success
rule for step-size adaption in evolutionary strategies. While in continuous
domains this principle is well understood also from a mathematical point of
view, no comparable theory is available for problems in discrete domains.
In this work we show that the one-fifth success rule can be effective also in
discrete settings. We regard the ~GA proposed in
[Doerr/Doerr/Ebel: From black-box complexity to designing new genetic
algorithms, TCS 2015]. We prove that if its population size is chosen according
to the one-fifth success rule then the expected optimization time on
\textsc{OneMax} is linear. This is better than what \emph{any} static
population size can achieve and is asymptotically optimal also among
all adaptive parameter choices.Comment: This is the full version of a paper that is to appear at GECCO 201
Unbiased Black-Box Complexities of Jump Functions
We analyze the unbiased black-box complexity of jump functions with small,
medium, and large sizes of the fitness plateau surrounding the optimal
solution.
Among other results, we show that when the jump size is , that is, only a small constant fraction of the fitness values
is visible, then the unbiased black-box complexities for arities and higher
are of the same order as those for the simple \textsc{OneMax} function. Even
for the extreme jump function, in which all but the two fitness values
and are blanked out, polynomial-time mutation-based (i.e., unary unbiased)
black-box optimization algorithms exist. This is quite surprising given that
for the extreme jump function almost the whole search space (all but a
fraction) is a plateau of constant fitness.
To prove these results, we introduce new tools for the analysis of unbiased
black-box complexities, for example, selecting the new parent individual not by
comparing the fitnesses of the competing search points, but also by taking into
account the (empirical) expected fitnesses of their offspring.Comment: This paper is based on results presented in the conference versions
[GECCO 2011] and [GECCO 2014
OneMax in Black-Box Models with Several Restrictions
Black-box complexity studies lower bounds for the efficiency of
general-purpose black-box optimization algorithms such as evolutionary
algorithms and other search heuristics. Different models exist, each one being
designed to analyze a different aspect of typical heuristics such as the memory
size or the variation operators in use. While most of the previous works focus
on one particular such aspect, we consider in this work how the combination of
several algorithmic restrictions influence the black-box complexity. Our
testbed are so-called OneMax functions, a classical set of test functions that
is intimately related to classic coin-weighing problems and to the board game
Mastermind.
We analyze in particular the combined memory-restricted ranking-based
black-box complexity of OneMax for different memory sizes. While its isolated
memory-restricted as well as its ranking-based black-box complexity for bit
strings of length is only of order , the combined model does not
allow for algorithms being faster than linear in , as can be seen by
standard information-theoretic considerations. We show that this linear bound
is indeed asymptotically tight. Similar results are obtained for other memory-
and offspring-sizes. Our results also apply to the (Monte Carlo) complexity of
OneMax in the recently introduced elitist model, in which only the best-so-far
solution can be kept in the memory. Finally, we also provide improved lower
bounds for the complexity of OneMax in the regarded models.
Our result enlivens the quest for natural evolutionary algorithms optimizing
OneMax in iterations.Comment: This is the full version of a paper accepted to GECCO 201
Reducing the Arity in Unbiased Black-Box Complexity
We show that for all the -ary unbiased black-box
complexity of the -dimensional \onemax function class is . This
indicates that the power of higher arity operators is much stronger than what
the previous bound by Doerr et al. (Faster black-box algorithms
through higher arity operators, Proc. of FOGA 2011, pp. 163--172, ACM, 2011)
suggests.
The key to this result is an encoding strategy, which might be of independent
interest. We show that, using -ary unbiased variation operators only, we may
simulate an unrestricted memory of size bits.Comment: An extended abstract of this paper has been accepted for inclusion in
the proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO
2012
Simple and Optimal Randomized Fault-Tolerant Rumor Spreading
We revisit the classic problem of spreading a piece of information in a group
of fully connected processors. By suitably adding a small dose of
randomness to the protocol of Gasienic and Pelc (1996), we derive for the first
time protocols that (i) use a linear number of messages, (ii) are correct even
when an arbitrary number of adversarially chosen processors does not
participate in the process, and (iii) with high probability have the
asymptotically optimal runtime of when at least an arbitrarily
small constant fraction of the processors are working. In addition, our
protocols do not require that the system is synchronized nor that all
processors are simultaneously woken up at time zero, they are fully based on
push-operations, and they do not need an a priori estimate on the number of
failed nodes.
Our protocols thus overcome the typical disadvantages of the two known
approaches, algorithms based on random gossip (typically needing a large number
of messages due to their unorganized nature) and algorithms based on fair
workload splitting (which are either not {time-efficient} or require intricate
preprocessing steps plus synchronization).Comment: This is the author-generated version of a paper which is to appear in
Distributed Computing, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/s00446-014-0238-z It is
available online from
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00446-014-0238-z This version
contains some new results (Section 6
Complexity Theory for Discrete Black-Box Optimization Heuristics
A predominant topic in the theory of evolutionary algorithms and, more
generally, theory of randomized black-box optimization techniques is running
time analysis. Running time analysis aims at understanding the performance of a
given heuristic on a given problem by bounding the number of function
evaluations that are needed by the heuristic to identify a solution of a
desired quality. As in general algorithms theory, this running time perspective
is most useful when it is complemented by a meaningful complexity theory that
studies the limits of algorithmic solutions.
In the context of discrete black-box optimization, several black-box
complexity models have been developed to analyze the best possible performance
that a black-box optimization algorithm can achieve on a given problem. The
models differ in the classes of algorithms to which these lower bounds apply.
This way, black-box complexity contributes to a better understanding of how
certain algorithmic choices (such as the amount of memory used by a heuristic,
its selective pressure, or properties of the strategies that it uses to create
new solution candidates) influences performance.
In this chapter we review the different black-box complexity models that have
been proposed in the literature, survey the bounds that have been obtained for
these models, and discuss how the interplay of running time analysis and
black-box complexity can inspire new algorithmic solutions to well-researched
problems in evolutionary computation. We also discuss in this chapter several
interesting open questions for future work.Comment: This survey article is to appear (in a slightly modified form) in the
book "Theory of Randomized Search Heuristics in Discrete Search Spaces",
which will be published by Springer in 2018. The book is edited by Benjamin
Doerr and Frank Neumann. Missing numbers of pointers to other chapters of
this book will be added as soon as possibl
- …