Is upper gastrointestinal radiography a cost-effective alternative to a Helicobacter pylori “Test and Treat” strategy for patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease?

Current clinical consensus supports an initial Helicobacter pylori (HP) “test and treat” approach when compared to immediate endoscopy for patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease. Alternative diagnostic approaches that incorporate upper GI radiography (UGI) have not been previously evaluated. We sought to determine the cost effectiveness of UGI compared to a HP test and treat strategy, incorporating recent data addressing the reduced prevalence of HP, lower cost of diagnostic interventions, and reduced attribution of PUD to HP. METHODS : Using decision analysis, three diagnostic and treatment strategies were evaluated: 1) Test and Treat —initial HP serology, treat patients who test positive with HP eradication and antiulcer therapy; 2) Initial UGI series —treat all patients with documented ulcer disease with HP eradication and antiulcer therapy; and 3) Initial UGI series, HP serology if ulcer present — treat ulcer and HP based on diagnostic test results. RESULTS : The estimated cost per ulcer cured for each strategy were as follows: test and treat, $3,025; initial UGI,$3,690; and UGI with serology, $3,790. The estimated cost per patient treatment were: test and treat,$498; initial UGI, $610; and UGI with serology,$620. When UGI reimbursement was decreased to less than $50, the UGI strategies yielded a lower cost per patient treated than the test and treat strategy. CONCLUSION : At the current level of reimbursement, UGI should not be considered a cost-effective alternative to the HP test and treat strategy for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73722/1/j.1572-0241.2000.01837.x.pd

Placebo and placebo effect: their impact on the evaluation of drug response in patients.

Placebo, defined as any therapeutic procedure, without any specific activity, given deliberately to have an effect on a patient, symptom, syndrome or disease, has a great impact in the evaluation of drug response. The possible pathways via which the possible effect brings about clinical and physiological changes remain unknown, but a humoral mechanism seems to be implicated in some placebo effects (e.g. placebo-induced analgesia). The placebo effect depends on many factors, including the type of patient, the personality of the physician, the doctor-patient relationship and the type and even the colour of the drug preparation. Placebo control is important particularly when the disease is characterized by frequent spontaneous periods of acute exacerbation and remission. Functional (such as dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome) and organic (such as peptic ulcer and inflammatory bowel disease) gastrointestinal diseases have got great benefit from placebo-controlled clinical trials. In such trials the more effective the placebo is, the more difficult it will be to demonstrate the efficacy of active drug in statistical terms. Nevertheless, provided the use of placebo be ethical for a given condition, placebo-controlled trials are the only objective way of assessing correctly drug response in patients

Novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: what we have learned from animal studies

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is frequently associated with serious adverse effects related to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) in tissues where prostanoids exert physiological effects, such as gastric mucosal defence, renal homeostasis and platelet aggregation. The discovery of a second COX isoform (COX-2) specifically induced in pathological tissues led to the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors, believed to have an improved safety profile compared to traditional NSAIDs. Animal studies, however, have revealed a protective role for the COX-2 enzyme in the stomach, kidney, heart, vasculature and reproductive system, and therefore, the safety of COX-2 selective inhibitors needs to be reassessed. On the other hand, new therapeutic indications have emerged as a result of the role played by COX-2 overexpression in cancer or Alzheimer's disease. A second approach aimed at obtaining safer NSAIDs is based on the gastroprotective effects of nitric oxide (NO). Traditional NSAIDs chemically linked to NO-releasing moieties retain the therapeutic efficacy, but not the adverse effects, of the parent NSAIDs. Moreover, additional therapeutic applications in cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer's disease and cancer have been suggested. Animal data, however, need to be confirmed in large clinical trials. Finally, the increase in endogenous NO via a selective increase in inducible NO synthase in the gastric mucosa is the mechanism underlying the good gastric tolerability and the gastroprotective effects of the non-selective NSAID amtolmetin guacyl, documented to date in the ra