1 research outputs found
Technetium and Rhenium Pentacarbonyl Complexes with C<sub>2</sub> and C<sub>11</sub> ω‑Isocyanocarboxylic Acid Esters
Technetium(I)
and rhenium(I) pentacarbonyl complexes with ethyl 2-isocyanoacetate
and methyl 11-isocyanoundecanoate, [M(CO)<sub>5</sub>(CNCH<sub>2</sub>COOEt)]ClO<sub>4</sub> (M = Tc (<b>1</b>) and Re (<b>2</b>)) and [M(CO)<sub>5</sub>(CN(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>10</sub>COOMe)]ClO<sub>4</sub> (M = Tc (<b>3</b>) and Re (<b>4</b>)), were prepared and characterized
by IR, <sup>1</sup>H NMR, and <sup>13</sup>C{<sup>1</sup>H} NMR spectroscopy.
The crystal structures of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> were determined
using single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The kinetics of thermal decarbonylation
of technetium complexes <b>1</b> and <b>3</b> in ethylene
glycol was studied by IR spectroscopy. The rate constants and activation
parameters of this reaction were determined and compared with those
for [Tc(CO)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>+</sup>. It was found that rhenium complexes <b>2</b> and <b>4</b> were stable with respect to thermal decarbonylation.
Histidine challenge reaction of complexes <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> in phosphate buffer was examined by IR spectroscopy. In
the presence of histidine, the rhenium pentacarbonyl isocyanide complex
partially decomposes to form an unidentified yellow precipitate. Technetium
analogue <b>1</b> is more stable under these conditions