5 research outputs found
Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6
Ibrutinib may inhibitintestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary
to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral
contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and
OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B-cell
malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 μg) and bupropion/midazolam
(75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal
CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single-dose ibrutinib plus single-dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady-state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs;
test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma
concentration-time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed-effects models (90%
confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR
for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady-state, the
Cmax and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered
clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not
inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6,
as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion
Durable response with single-agent acalabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma
Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have greatly
improved the spectrum of treatment options in mantle cell
lymphoma (MCL) [1–4]. Acalabrutinib is a highly selective,
orally administered, and potent BTK inhibitor with limited
off-target activity [5]. Acalabrutinib was approved in 2017
by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment
of relapsed/refractory MCL based on clinical data from the
open-label, multicenter, phase 2 ACE-LY-004 study of
acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily [1]. Here, we present
updated results from the ACE-LY-004 study after a median
26-month follow-up.
Eligibility criteria and study design were published previously (Supplementary methods) [1]. Analysis of minimal
residual disease (MRD) was conducted after complete
response (CR) or partial response (PR) was achieved
using the quantitative ClonoSEQ next-generation sequencing (5 × 10−6
) assay (Adpative Biotechnologies, Seattle,
WA, USA) in consenting patients with available paired
archival tumor and whole blood samples. Data are updated
as of February 12, 2018
Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6
Ibrutinib may inhibitintestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary
to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral
contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and
OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B-cell
malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 μg) and bupropion/midazolam
(75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal
CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single-dose ibrutinib plus single-dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady-state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs;
test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma
concentration-time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed-effects models (90%
confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR
for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady-state, the
Cmax and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered
clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not
inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6,
as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion
Older patients (aged ≥60 years) with previously untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma:a detailed analysis from the phase III ECHELON-1 study
Effective and tolerable treatments are needed for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We report results for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the large phase III ECHELON-1 study of frontline brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility for older versus younger patients (aged ≥60 vs. <60 years) was a pre-specified subgroup analysis; as the ECHELON- 1 study was not powered for these analyses, reported P-values are descriptive. Of 1,334 enrolled patients, 186 (14%) were aged ≥60 years (A+AVD: n=84, ABVD: n=102); results below refer to this age group. Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility was similar in the two arms at 24 months (A+AVD: 70.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.4–79.4], ABVD: 71.4% [95% CI: 60.5–79.8], hazard ratio (HR)=1.00 [95% CI: 0.58–1.72], P=0.993). After a median follow-up of 60.9 months, 5-year progression-free survival per investigator was 67.1% with A+AVD versus 61.6% with ABVD (HR=0.820 [95% CI: 0.494–1.362], P=0.443). Comparing A+AVD versus ABVD, grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18% versus 3%; any-grade febrile neutropenia in 37% versus 17%; and any-grade pulmonary toxicity in 2% versus 13%, respectively, with three (3%) pulmonary toxicity-related deaths in patients receiving ABVD (none in those receiving A+AVD). Altogether, A+AVD showed overall similar efficacy to ABVD with survival rates in both arms comparing favorably to those of prior series in older patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to ABVD, A+AVD was associated with higher rates of neuropathy and neutropenia, but lower rates of pulmonary-related toxicity. Trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01712490; EudraCT number: 2011-005450-60
The PD-1- and LAG-3-targeting bispecific molecule tebotelimab in solid tumors and hematologic cancers: A phase 1 trial
Tebotelimab, a bispecific PD-1×LAG-3 DART molecule that blocks both PD-1 and LAG-3, was investigated for clinical safety and activity in a phase 1 dose-escalation and cohort-expansion clinical trial in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies and disease progression on previous treatment. Primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose of tebotelimab when administered as a single agent (n = 269) or in combination with the anti-HER2 antibody margetuximab (n = 84). Secondary endpoints included anti-tumor activity. In patients with advanced cancer treated with tebotelimab monotherapy, 68% (184/269) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 22% were grade ≥3). No maximum tolerated dose was defined; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 600 mg once every 2 weeks. There were tumor decreases in 34% (59/172) of response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, with objective responses in multiple solid tumor types, including PD-1-refractory disease, and in LAG-3+ non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including CAR-T refractory disease. To enhance potential anti-tumor responses, we tested margetuximab plus tebotelimab. In patients with HER2+ tumors treated with tebotelimab plus margetuximab, 74% (62/84) had TRAEs (17% were grade ≥3). The RP2D was 600 mg once every 3 weeks. The confirmed objective response rate in these patients was 19% (14/72), including responses in patients typically not responsive to anti-HER2/anti-PD-1 combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03219268