3,719 research outputs found

    Dispersive representation of the K pi vector form factor and fits to tau -> K pi nu(tau) and Ke3 data

    Full text link
    Recently, we introduced several dispersive representations for the vector KπK\pi form factor and fitted them to the Belle spectrum of τ→Kπντ\tau \to K \pi \nu_\tau. Here, we briefly present the model and discuss the results for the slope and curvature of F+(s)F_+(s) arising from the best fit. Furthermore, we compare the pole position of the charged K∗(892)K^*(892) computed from our model with other results in the literature. Finally, we discuss the prospects of a simultaneous fit to τ→Kπντ\tau \to K \pi \nu_\tau and Ke3K_{e3} spectra.Comment: Talk given at "International Workshop on Effective Field Theories: from the pion to the upsilon", February 2009, Valencia, Spain. 7 pages, 2 figures. PoS style. Minor correction in figure

    Improving the Kpi vector form factor through Kl3 constraints

    Get PDF
    The KπK\pi vector form factor, F+KπF_+^{K\pi}, used to reproduce the Belle spectrum of \tauKpi decays is described by means of a three-times subtracted dispersion relation also incorporating constraints from Kl3K_{l3} decays. The slope and curvature of F+KπF_+^{K\pi} are fitted to the data yielding λ+′=(25.49±0.31)×10−3\lambda_+'=(25.49 \pm 0.31) \times 10^{-3} and λ+"=(12.22±0.14)×10−4\lambda_+"= (12.22 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{-4}. The pole parameters of the K∗(892)±K^*(892)^\pm are found to be mK∗(892)±=892.0±0.5m_{K^*(892)^\pm}= 892.0\pm 0.5 MeV and ΓK∗(892)±=46.5±1.1\Gamma_{K^*(892)^\pm}= 46.5 \pm1.1 MeV. The phase-space integrals relevant for Kl3K_{l3} analyses and the PP-wave isospin-1/2 KπK\pi phase-shift threshold parameters are also calculated.Comment: 3 pages, uses aipproc style. Talk presented by R. Escribano at the IX International Conference on Quark Confinement and Hadron Spectrum (QCHS09), Madrid, Spain, 30.8-3.9.201

    Comparison of musculoskeletal networks of the primate forelimb

    Get PDF
    Anatomical network analysis is a framework for quantitatively characterizing the topological organization of anatomical structures, thus providing a way to compare structural integration and modularity among species. Here we apply this approach to study the macroevolution of the forelimb in primates, a structure whose proportions and functions vary widely within this group. We analyzed musculoskeletal network models in 22 genera, including members of all major extant primate groups and three outgroup taxa, after an extensive literature survey and dissections. The modules of the proximal limb are largely similar among taxa, but those of the distal limb show substantial variation. Some network parameters are similar within phylogenetic groups (e.g., non-primates, strepsirrhines, New World monkeys, and hominoids). Reorganization of the modules in the hominoid hand compared to other primates may relate to functional changes such as coordination of individual digit movements, increased pronation/supination, and knuckle-walking. Surprisingly, humans are one of the few taxa we studied in which the thumb musculoskeletal structures do not form an independent anatomical module. This difference may be caused by the loss in humans of some intrinsic muscles associated with the digits or the acquisition of additional muscles that integrate the thumb more closely with surrounding structures
    • …
    corecore