Uterine carcinosarcoma with microsatellite instability - does immunotherapy modify the therapeutic scenario? A case report and literature review

Carcinosarcomas were reclassified by World Health Organization as high-grade uterine carcinomas in 2014. Due to its rare histology, comprising only 5% of uterine carcinomas, there is a small representation of this tumor in studies that evaluate metastatic uterine carcinomas treatment. In 2022, the treatment of metastatic uterine carcinomas has changed dramatically with the inclusion of immunotherapy in the therapeutic arsenal, either as a monotherapy or in combination with lenvatinib. The status of microsatellites is paramount in the therapeutic decision for this tumor; carcinosarcoma patients haven't been included in randomized trials so far. Here we report the case of a 60-year-old woman diagnosed with recurrent carcinosarcoma metastatic to the liver and pelvis. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated microsatellite instability (loss of MLH1 and PMS2 nuclear staining). She received immunotherapy with pembrolizumab every three weeks as monotherapy and after 4 cycles, she achieved a complete radiological response in the liver and a partial response in the pelvis

Independent Radiologic Review in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis addressing evaluation bias in local radiologic assessment (LRA) of lesions when compared with independent radiologic review (IRR) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and Web sites for major medical meetings were searched for RCTs of chemotherapy for metastatic CRC that reported response evaluation by both LRA and IRR. The risk ratios (RRs) of response in the experimental (RRexp) and control (RRcont) arms were calculated (response rate in LRA divided by response rate in IRR) for each selected study. The ratio of RR of response was calculated (RR of response of LRA divided by RR of response of IRR). The random-effects model was applied. Meta-regression was used to examine the effect of study characteristics on outcomes. Results: LRA and IRR results were concordant (13 studies; 7742 patients; ratio of RR of response = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.90, 1.04; P = .35). However, LRA overestimated tumor response independently of therapy allocation (interaction test, P = .81) both in control (RRcont, 1.163; 95% CI: 1.086, 1.246; P < .001) and experimental (RRexp, 1.156; 95% CI: 1.093, 1.222; P < .001) therapies. Meta-regression did not show any effect of trial characteristics on effects. Conclusion: LRA yields higher response rates in RCTs testing chemotherapy for metastatic CRC, although there was no sign of bias toward experimental therapy. The need for IRR to control evaluation bias must be reappraised. (C) RSNA, 20122631869

Squamous differentiation portends poor prognosis in low and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer presents well-defined risk factors: myometrial invasion, histological subtype, tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Some low and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer patients exhibited unexpected outcomes. This study aimed to investigate other clinical-pathological factors that might influence the recurrence rates of patients diagnosed with low and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer

Key issues in the management of cervical cancer: consensus recommendations by a Brazilian expert panel

Objective: We report the results of a panel of Brazilian experts and provide recommendations for the management of these patients. Material and Methods: The panel convened composed by 28 local opinion leaders, addressed 59 multiple-choice questions taking into account the published scientific literature and their own clinical experience. The level of agreement among panel members was qualified as (1) consensus, when at least 75% of the voting panel members; (2) majority vote (50%-74.9%); or (3) less than majority vote. Results: There was at least majority vote for eight of 10 questions on staging and follow-up; for 14 of 23 questions on the treatment of early-stage disease; for 12 of 14 questions related to the treatment of locally-advanced disease; and for seven of the 12 questions related to the treatment of recurrent/metastatic disease. Conclusion: The current recommendations may help practitioners from Brazil and other countries to improve the care they provide to patients