Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with or without autonomic neuropathy: a radionuclide ventriculography study.

We investigated the relation between diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) and left ventricular (LV) function in 59 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) free of coronary artery disease (CAD) or hypertension. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy was established by ≥2 abnormal autonomic nervous function tests. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions were assessed by resting radionuclide ventriculography. Compared with non-DAN patients (n=24), patients with DAN (n=35) had an increased adjusted atrial contribution to ventricular filling (A/V%, 30.1%±8.2% vs 26.5%±5.1%; P=.031), suggestive of diastolic dysfunction (DD). There were no differences between the 2 groups in peak filling rate, first 1/3 filling fraction, ejection fraction, cardiac output, and cardiac index. Patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy had an increased heart rate (77.8±6.3 vs 69.3±3.3 bpm; P<.0001) and a higher rest LV workload (10,072±1165 vs 8606±1075 bpm mm Hg; P<.0001). Patients with DAN T2DM without CAD or hypertension have DD, increased A/V index, and a higher LV working load than non-DAN patients

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with or without autonomic neuropathy: a radionuclide ventriculography study.

We investigated the relation between diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) and left ventricular (LV) function in 59 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) free of coronary artery disease (CAD) or hypertension. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy was established by ≥2 abnormal autonomic nervous function tests. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions were assessed by resting radionuclide ventriculography. Compared with non-DAN patients (n=24), patients with DAN (n=35) had an increased adjusted atrial contribution to ventricular filling (A/V%, 30.1%±8.2% vs 26.5%±5.1%; P=.031), suggestive of diastolic dysfunction (DD). There were no differences between the 2 groups in peak filling rate, first 1/3 filling fraction, ejection fraction, cardiac output, and cardiac index. Patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy had an increased heart rate (77.8±6.3 vs 69.3±3.3 bpm; P<.0001) and a higher rest LV workload (10,072±1165 vs 8606±1075 bpm mm Hg; P<.0001). Patients with DAN T2DM without CAD or hypertension have DD, increased A/V index, and a higher LV working load than non-DAN patients

Aortic elastic properties are related to left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate left ventricular diastolic function and its relation to aortic wall stiffness in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without coronary artery disease or hypertension. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were examined by echocardiography and divided into two groups according to the diastolic filling pattern determined by mitral annulus tissue Doppler velocities. Group A patients (n = 21) presented diastolic dysfunction with a peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Em)/peak late diastolic mitral annular velocity (Am) ratio &lt;1 whereas in group B patients (n = 45) the Em/Am ratio was &gt;1. Coronary artery disease was excluded based on normal thallium scintigraphy. Aortic stiffness index was calculated from aortic diameters measured by echocardiography, using accepted criteria. RESULTS: Aortic stiffness index differed significantly among the two groups. Significant correlations were found between parameters of left ventricular diastolic function (Em/Am, isovolumic relaxation time, deceleration time) and aortic stiffness index. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis revealed aortic stiffness index (beta = -0.39, p = 0.001) and isovolumic relaxation time (beta = -0.46, p &lt; 0.001) as the main predictors of Em/Am ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic stiffness is increased in type 1 diabetic patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. This impairment in aortic elastic properties seems to be related to parameters of diastolic function

The ORListat and cardiovascular risk profile in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 Diabetes (ORLICARDIA) study

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is associated with a marked increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Aim: To investigate the effect of orlistat plus hypo-caloric diet (HCD) vs HCD alone on the cardiovascular risk profile in patients with both MetSyn (National Cholesterol Educational Program-NCEP-Adult Treatment Panel III definition) and type 2 DM. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled study. One hundred and twenty-six patients, free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, were included in the final analysis. Ninety-four (73%) patients were treated with orlistat (360 mg/day) and HCD for a 6-month period, while 34 (27%) were on HCD alone. Analysis of covariance was used to assess differences between the treatment groups over time. Main outcome measures: Components of the MetSyn criteria assessed were: waist circumference; systolic and diastolic blood pressure; fasting glucose, triglycerides; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) plus body mass index; glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1C)); homeostasis model for assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) index; and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Results: By protocol, all patients had MetSyn at baseline. After a 6 month treatment period there were significant differences between the orlistat plus HCD vs the HCD-alone groups in body weight (p = 0.0001), waist circumference (p &lt; 0.0001), fasting glucose (p &lt; 0.0001), HbA(1C) (p &lt; 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.024), total cholesterol (p &lt; 0.0001), LDL-C (p = 0.034), and HOMA index (p = 0.022), while there were no significant differences in triglycerides and HDL-C. Orlistat was well tolerated. By the end of the study, 65% of the patients on orlistat plus HCD were still meeting the MetSyn criteria and 41% had four to five MetSyn components vs 91% (p &lt; 0.0001) and 53% (p = 0.017), respectively, of those on HCD alone. Conclusions: Orlistat plus HCD favourably modified several cardiovascular risk factors in patients with both MetSyn and type 2 DM. These effects might partly offset the excess cardiovascular risk and improve outcome in this patient population