Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Comparative Bioavailability of Single, Oral 2-mg Doses of Dexamethasone Liquid and Tablet Formulations: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Background: Dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid used widely worldwide for immunosuppressive treatment, allergies, bronchiolitis, and croup, among others. For children, liquid formulations are especially suitable because, compared with other dosage forms, both exact dosing and proper intake are facilitated. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and comparative bioavailability of a commercial liquid oral dexamethasone formulation intended for pediatric use relative to those of a tablet. Methods: In a randomized, controlled, crossover study in 24 healthy adult volunteers, we administered single doses of the liquid and tablet formulation, containing 2 mg of dexamethasone each. Blood samples were taken up to 24 hours postdose. Quantification was carried out using a validated specific and sensitive high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV detector method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between treatments according to European Medicines Agency (EMA) bioequivalence guidelines. For AUC(0-t) and C(max), the 90% CI for the ratio of the test and reference products should be contained within the predetermined acceptance interval of 80% to 125%. As a pharmacodynamic variable, we measured suppression of endogenous cortisol (predose and postdose). Results: Both preparations showed similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles but high between-subject variability of pharmacokinetic key parameters and endogenous cortisol concentrations (>30%). Mean AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and C(max) were 37.8 ng/mL/h, 46.0 ng/mL/h, and 9.35 ng/mL, respectively, for the liquid and 41.3 ng/mL/h, 48.1 ng/mL/h, and 9.17 ng/mL, respectively, for the tablet formulation. T(max) was 0.89 hour (liquid) and 0.97 hour (tablet). The point estimates and 90% CIs for AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) ratios (liquid vs tablet) were 91.42% (82.05%-101.86%), 95.72% (84.46%-108.5%), and 102.04% (86.94%-119.76%), respectively. Thus, point estimates and 90% CIs were within the bioequivalence range of 80% to 125% for all relevant parameters, including the pharmacodynamic parameter AUEC (area under the effect curve). Conclusions: This single-dose study suggests that the test and reference products met the EMA regulatory criteria to assume bioequivalence in these fasting healthy male and female volunteers. German Register of Clinical Trials registration number: DRKS00000785. (Clin Ther. 2011;33:1831-1841) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Hepatic CYP3A Activity Using Midazolam

Diurnal changes in the activity of drug metabolizing enzymes may contribute to the variability in drug disposition and drug effects. The aim of this study was to quantify the circadian rhythmicity exhibited by hepatic CYP3A. A 10g/kg intravenous bolus dose, followed by a 30-hour 4g/kg/h intravenous infusion of midazolam, used as a probe substrate for hepatic CYP3A activity, was administered to 16 healthy volunteers (8 males and 8 females). Blood samples were drawn hourly for 24hours after achieving steady state, and plasma concentrations of midazolam and its main metabolite 1-OH midazolam were determined. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. One-compartment pharmacokinetic models best described midazolam and 1-OH midazolam pharmacokinetic disposition. An unequivocal but minor diurnal pattern was identified in the midazolam plasma concentration profiles, which was described using a cosine function with a 24-hours period. The fluctuation in the relative CYP3A activity ranged between 10% above average around 15:00, and 10% below average around 03:00. None of the covariates tested had a significant impact on the parameters estimated. Although a diurnal pattern in hepatic CYP3A activity was identified, its magnitude suggests that it is small and without clinical significance for drug therapy

Measurement of sorafenib plasma concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: is it useful the application in clinical practice? A pilot study

Pharmacokinetics and dose-finding studies on sorafenib were conducted on heterogeneous groups of patients with solid tumors. Portal hypertension, gut motility impairment and altered bile enterohepatic circulation may explain different sorafenib toxicological profile in cirrhotic patients. This study evaluated sorafenib plasma concentration in a homogeneous group of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography in 12 consecutive patients. Data have been evaluated by the generalized estimating equations method (p value statistical level was set at alpha = 0.05). (1) There were not significant differences between sorafenib concentrations in patients who tolerate the full dose versus patients with reduced dose due to toxicity; (2) the average sorafenib concentrations measured 3 h after the morning dosing were lower than those measured 12 h after the evening dosing (p = 0.005); (3) sorafenib concentrations decrease overtime (p < 10(-4)); (4) it has been found an association between the development of severe adverse reactions and sorafenib concentrations (p < 10(-5)). The relationship between dose and concentration of sorafenib in HCC patients is poor and not clinically predictable, confirming the variability both in the maximum tolerated dose and in plasma concentrations. Several factors may influence the pharmacokinetics in patients with liver disease. This may explain the inter-patient variability of concentrations and the lack of differences in concentration at different dosages. It could be interesting to extend the series of HCC patients to enhance information on the kinetics of the drug; furthermore, to establish a threshold of plasma sorafenib concentrations to predict severe adverse reactions would be clinically useful

Implementation of preventive and predictive BRCA testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer: a position paper of Italian Scientific Societies

: Constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with an increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancers. Current evidence indicates that BRCA1/2 PVs are also associated with pancreatic cancer, and that BRCA2 PVs are associated with prostate cancer risk. The identification of carriers of constitutional PVs in the BRCA1/2 genes allows the implementation of individual and family prevention pathways, through validated screening programs and risk-reducing strategies. According to the relevant and increasing therapeutic predictive implications, the inclusion of BRCA testing in the routine management of patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers represent a key requirement to optimize medical or surgical therapeutic and prevention decision-making, and access to specific anticancer therapies. Therefore, accurate patient selection, the use of standardized and harmonized procedures, and adherence to homogeneous testing criteria, are essential elements to implement BRCA testing in clinical practice. This consensus position paper has been developed and approved by a multidisciplinary Expert Panel of 64 professionals on behalf of the AIOM-AIRO-AISP-ANISC-AURO-Fondazione AIOM-SIAPEC/IAP-SIBioC-SICO-SIF-SIGE-SIGU-SIU-SIURO-UROP Italian Scientific Societies, and a patient association (aBRCAdaBRA Onlus). The working group included medical, surgical and radiation oncologists, medical and molecular geneticists, clinical molecular biologists, surgical and molecular pathologists, organ specialists such as gynecologists, gastroenterologists and urologists, and pharmacologists. The manuscript is based on the expert consensus and reports the best available evidence, according to the current eligibility criteria for BRCA testing and counseling, it also harmonizes with current Italian National Guidelines and Clinical Recommendations

A multi-element psychosocial intervention for early psychosis (GET UP PIANO TRIAL) conducted in a catchment area of 10 million inhabitants: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Multi-element interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) are promising, but have mostly been conducted in non-epidemiologically representative samples, thereby raising the risk of underestimating the complexities involved in treating FEP in 'real-world' services