Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study

ObjectivesTo investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases.MethodsForty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0–3) and a continuous quantitative measurement (“VAS echogenicity,” 0–100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall’s Tau and Pearson’s Rho coefficients.ResultsThe semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57–0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68–0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. “VAS echogenicity” showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75–0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88–0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and “VAS echogenicity” [ICC = 0.52 (0.50–0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively).ConclusionThe results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases

Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: Options, uses and optimization

Recent advances in imaging technology are dramatically changing the approach to patients with inflammatory arthritis. Conventional radiography is still the major imaging modality used to evaluate patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice. In the last decade, several investigations have shown the diagnostic ability of MRI and ultrasound to rectify the traditional approach to early diagnosis and disease activity monitoring. This review will summarize the options, uses and optimization of these imaging modalities with a special focus on ultrasound, which is currently the most promising tool to change the paradigms in both early diagnosis and therapy monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis

Hand Tendon Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Ultrasound Study

Objective: To assess the prevalence and the distribution of tendon involvement in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) describing in detail the ultrasound (US) morphostructural and vascular tendon abnormalities. Methods: Ninety consecutive RA patients were included in the study. The following tendons were scanned bilaterally: flexor pollicis longus tendon, flexor digitorum superficialis, and profundus tendons of the II to the V fingers (at both finger and carpal tunnel levels), flexor carpi radialis tendon, and extensor tendons of the 6 compartments on the dorsal aspect of the wrist. The presence of US findings indicative of tenosynovitis and tendon damage was investigated. Results: Tenosynovitis was found in at least 1 anatomic site of 44 (48.8%) of 90 patients. Tendon damage was found in at least 1 anatomic site of 39 (43.3%) of 90 patients. The focal tendon echotexture derangement was found in 294 of 5400 (5.4%) tendons, the partial and complete tears in 14 (0.3%), and in 3 (0.06%) tendons, respectively. The most frequently involved tendons were the flexor tendons of the II, III, and IV fingers and the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon. Conclusions: The present study provides evidence in favor of the ability of US to reveal a relatively high frequency of tendon involvement at the hand and wrist level in RA patients. These data can both facilitate US examinations in daily clinical practice and direct further investigations in the US assessment of tendon involvement in RA