Complete mesocolic excision does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies : a comparative retrospective single-center study

Background: Since the implementation of total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer surgery, oncological outcomes improved dramatically. With the technique of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), the same surgical principles were introduced to the field of colon cancer surgery. Until now, current literature fails to invariably demonstrate its oncological superiority when compared to conventional surgery, and there are some concerns on increased morbidity. The aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes after left-sided laparoscopic CME versus conventional surgery. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, data on all laparoscopic sigmoidal resections performed during a 3-year period (October 2015 to October 2018) at our institution were collected. A comparative analysis between the CME group-for sigmoid colon cancer-and the non-CME group-for benign disease-was performed. Results: One hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Data on 66 CME resections were compared with 97 controls. Median age and operative risk were higher in the CME group. One leak was observed in the CME group (1/66) and 3 in the non-CME group (3/97), representing no significant difference. Regarding hospital stay, postoperative complications, surgical site infections, and intra-abdominal collections, no differences were observed. There was a slightly lower reoperation (1.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.243) and readmission rate (4.5% versus 6.2%, p = 0.740) in the CME group during the first 30 postoperative days. Operation times were significantly longer in the CME group (210 versus 184 min, p < 0.001), and a trend towards longer pathological specimens in the CME group was noted (21 vs 19 cm, p = 0.059). Conclusions: CME does not increase short-term complications in laparoscopic left-sided colectomies. Significantly longer operation times were observed in the CME group

National consensus on a new resectability classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - A modified Delphi method

Background: Currently, no practical definition of potentially resectable, borderline or unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is available. Aim of this study was to define criteria to categorize patients for use in a future neoadjuvant or induction therapy study. Method: Using the modified DELPHI method, hepatobiliary surgeons from all tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in this study. During five online meetings, predefined factors determining resectability and additional factors regarding surgical resectability and operability were discussed. Results: The five online meetings resulted in 52 statements. After two surveys, consensus was reached in 63% of the questions. The main consensus included a definition regarding potential resectability. 1) Clearly resectable: no vascular involvement (≤90°) of the future liver remnant (FLR) and expected feasibility of radical biliary resection. 2) Clearly unresectable: non-reconstructable venous and/or arterial involvement of the FLR or no feasible radical biliary resection. 3) Borderline resectable: all patients between clearly resectable and clearly unresectable disease. Conclusion: This DELPHI study resulted in a practical and applicable resectability, or more accurate, an explorability classification, which can be used to categorize patients for use in future neoadjuvant therapy studies.</p

Incidental finding of a congenital unilateral absence of the vas deferens during robotic inguinal hernia repair : missing a crucial landmark : a case report

Introduction We report on a case of congenital unilateral atresia of the vas deferens encountered during a robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Case report Our 65-years-old male patient was scheduled for a bilateral robotic-assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair because of bilateral symptomatic groin hernia. Standard intraoperative dissection obtaining a critical view of the myopectineal orifice did not allow for an identification of the vas deferens (VD) on the left side. On the right side, a normal VD was identified. There was no suspicion of an intraoperative lesion or ligation of the VD. Both gonadal and inferior epigastric vessels were present on both sides. Upon clinical evaluation, no VD was palpable in the scrotum on the left side. The diagnosis of a congenital unilateral absence of the vas deferens was made. Additional abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a congenital agenesis of the left kidney, ureter, vesicula seminalis and vas deferens. Discussion The accidental finding of a congenital absence of the vas deferens during inguinal hernia repair is rare. However, surgeons performing inguinal hernia repair should be aware of this condition and the clinical implications it poses, as this could prevent unnecessary exploration and missed diagnosis of associated underlying conditions

Reply To: Incisional Hernias After Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: More Attention Needed at Start and Finish

A

'Full prosthetic jacket' : external stenting of the renal vein

Introduction: We present a case of positional compression of the left renal vein (LRV) after right nephrectomy and caval reconstruction, treated by external stenting using a reinforced vascular prosthesis. Case report: A 69-year-old female patient presented because of swelling of the left leg. A renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was visualized on computed tomography (CT) scan in the right kidney, with a thrombus occluding the inferior caval vein (ICV) and the right renal vein (RRV). A right nephrectomy was performed, with ligation of the already occluded ICV. Venotomy allowed thrombectomy of the ICV above the level of the renal veins. Venous return from the left kidney was secured by reconstruction of the confluence of the LRV and the ICV. Postoperatively, urinary output declined, leading to anuria and elevated levels of serum creatinine. With surgical exposition of the LRV, a flow of 387 mL/min was measured. After removal of exposition, flow in the LRV dropped to 51 mL/min. The positional compression was treated with a reinforced vascular PolyTetraFluoroEthylene (PTFE) prosthesis placed around the LRV. Discussion: Besides some reports on external stenting of the renal vein in the treatment of nutcracker syndrome (NS), this is the first report describing this technique outside this clinical entity

Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment 5-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

peer reviewed[en] INTRODUCTION: The incidence of incisional hernias (IHs) after open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is high. Several randomized controlled trials have reported favorable results with the use of prophylactic mesh to prevent IHs, without increasing complications. In this analysis we report on the results of the 60-month follow-up of the PRIMAAT trial (Ann Surg 2016; 263(4): 638-45). METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized design, patients were randomized between prophylactic retrorectus mesh reinforcement (MESH group), and primary closure of their midline laparotomy after open AAA repair (NOMESH group). This article reports on the results of clinical follow-up after 60 months. If performed, ultrasonography or computed tomography were used for the diagnosis of IHs. RESULTS: Of the 120 randomized patients, 114 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Thirty-three patients in the NOMESH group (33/58-56.9%) and 34 patients in the MESH group (34/56-60.7%) were evaluated after 5 years. In each treatment arm, 10 patients died between the 24-month and 60-month follow-up. The cumulative incidence of IHs in the NOMESH group was 32.9% after 24 months and 49.2% after 60 months. No incisional hernias were diagnosed in the MESH group. In the NOMESH group, 21.7% (5/23) underwent reoperation within 5 years due to an IH. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic retrorectus mesh reinforcement after midline laparotomy for the treatment of AAAs safely and effectively decreases the rate of IHs. The cumulative incidence of IHs after open AAA repair, when no mesh is used, continues to increase during the first 5 years after surgery, which leads to a substantial rate of hernia repairs