3 research outputs found
Supplementary Material for: Validation of Surrogates of Urine Osmolality in Population Studies
<p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The importance of vasopressin and/or urine
concentration in various kidney, cardiovascular, and metabolic diseases
has been emphasized recently. Due to technical constraints, urine
osmolality (U<sub>osm</sub>), a direct reflect of urinary concentrating activity, is rarely measured in epidemiologic studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed 2 possible surrogates of U<sub>osm</sub> in 4 large population-based cohorts (total <i>n</i> = 4,247) and in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD, <i>n</i> = 146). An estimated U<sub>osm</sub> (eU<sub>osm</sub>)
based on the concentrations of sodium, potassium, and urea, and a urine
concentrating index (UCI) based on the ratio of creatinine
concentrations in urine and plasma were compared to the measured U<sub>osm</sub> (mU<sub>osm</sub>). <b><i>Results:</i></b> eU<sub>osm</sub> is an excellent surrogate of mU<sub>osm</sub>, with a highly significant linear relationship and values within 5% of mU<sub>osm</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.99 or 0.98 in each population cohort). Bland-Altman plots show a good agreement between eU<sub>osm</sub> and mU<sub>osm</sub>
with mean differences between the 2 variables within ±24 mmol/L. This
was verified in men and women, in day and night urine samples, and in
CKD patients. The relationship of UCI with mU<sub>osm</sub> is also
significant but is not linear and exhibits more dispersed values.
Moreover, the latter index is no longer representative of mU<sub>osm</sub> in patients with CKD as it declines much more quickly with declining glomerular filtration rate than mU<sub>osm</sub>. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The eU<sub>osm</sub>
is a valid marker of urine concentration in population-based and CKD
cohorts. The UCI can provide an estimate of urine concentration when no
other measurement is available, but should be used only in subjects with
normal renal function.</p
PowerPoint Slides for: Rationale and Design of a Clinical Trial Investigating Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
<p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In TEMPO 3:4, the vasopressin V2-receptor
antagonist tolvaptan slowed kidney growth and function decline in
autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients with
relatively preserved kidney function. <b><i>Methods:</i></b>
Prospective, phase 3b, multi-center, randomized-withdrawal,
placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of tolvaptan in ADPKD patients
with late stage 2 to early stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The
primary endpoint was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change
from pre-treatment baseline to post-treatment follow-up. Secondary
endpoints included annualized eGFR slope, incidence of ADPKD
complications, and overall and hepatic safety profiles. Participants
were 18-55 year-old ADPKD patients with baseline eGFR ≥25 and ≤65
mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or 56-65 year-old with eGFR ≥25 and ≤44 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and evidence of eGFR decline >2.0 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>
per year. Daily split doses of tolvaptan were titrated to tolerance
(30/15, 45/15, 60/30, or 90/30 mg) and maintained for 12 months, after
an 8-week pre-randomization period to screen out subjects unable to
tolerate at least 60/30 mg for 3 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 1,495
subjects who entered the tolvaptan titration period, 125 (8.4%)
discontinued the study before randomization. One thousand three hundred
seventy subjects (684 tolvaptan, 686 placebo) from 213 centers across 21
countries were randomized. Baseline demographics were well balanced
across treatment arms. Information collected during the study included
eGFR, survey scores (PKD history and outcome), adverse events, vital
signs, hematology, urinalysis, and serum chemistry tests. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b>
Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: An Investigation of
Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy (REPRISE) determines whether tolvaptan
administered over 1 year exhibits disease-modifying properties in ADPKD
patients with late stage 2 to early stage 4 CKD, which provides an
important therapeutic advancement for this difficult-to-treat disease.</p
Supplementary Material for: Cystic Gene Dosage Influences Kidney Lesions After Nephron Reduction
<p>Cystic kidney disease is characterized by the progressive development
of multiple fluid-filled cysts. Cysts can be acquired, or they may
appear during development or in postnatal life due to specific gene
defects and lead to renal failure. The most frequent form of this
disease is the inherited polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Experimental
models of PKD showed that an increase of cellular proliferation and
apoptosis as well as defects in apico-basal and planar cell polarity or
cilia play a critical role in cyst development. However, little is known
about the mechanisms and the mediators involved in acquired cystic
kidney diseases (ACKD). In this study, we used the nephron reduction as a
model to study the mechanisms underlying cyst development in ACKD. We
found that tubular dilations after nephron reduction recapitulated most
of the morphological features of ACKD. The development of tubular
dilations was associated with a dramatic increase of cell proliferation.
In contrast, the apico-basal polarity and cilia did not seem to be
affected. Interestingly, polycystin 1 and fibrocystin were markedly
increased and polycystin 2 was decreased in cells lining the dilated
tubules, whereas the expression of several other cystic genes did not
change. More importantly, <i>Pkd1</i> haploinsufficiency accelerated the
development of tubular dilations after nephron reduction, a phenotype
that was associated to a further increase of cell proliferation. These
data were relevant to humans ACKD, as cystic genes expression and the
rate of cell proliferation were also increased. In conclusion, our study
suggests that the nephron reduction can be considered a suitable model
to study ACKD and that dosage of genes involved in PKD is also important
in ACKD.</p