3 research outputs found

    Supplementary Material for: Validation of Surrogates of Urine Osmolality in Population Studies

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The importance of vasopressin and/or urine concentration in various kidney, cardiovascular, and metabolic diseases has been emphasized recently. Due to technical constraints, urine osmolality (U<sub>osm</sub>), a direct reflect of urinary concentrating activity, is rarely measured in epidemiologic studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed 2 possible surrogates of U<sub>osm</sub> in 4 large population-based cohorts (total <i>n</i> = 4,247) and in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD, <i>n</i> = 146). An estimated U<sub>osm</sub> (eU<sub>osm</sub>) based on the concentrations of sodium, potassium, and urea, and a urine concentrating index (UCI) based on the ratio of creatinine concentrations in urine and plasma were compared to the measured U<sub>osm</sub> (mU<sub>osm</sub>). <b><i>Results:</i></b> eU<sub>osm</sub> is an excellent surrogate of mU<sub>osm</sub>, with a highly significant linear relationship and values within 5% of mU<sub>osm</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.99 or 0.98 in each population cohort). Bland-Altman plots show a good agreement between eU<sub>osm</sub> and mU<sub>osm</sub> with mean differences between the 2 variables within ±24 mmol/L. This was verified in men and women, in day and night urine samples, and in CKD patients. The relationship of UCI with mU<sub>osm</sub> is also significant but is not linear and exhibits more dispersed values. Moreover, the latter index is no longer representative of mU<sub>osm</sub> in patients with CKD as it declines much more quickly with declining glomerular filtration rate than mU<sub>osm</sub>. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The eU<sub>osm</sub> is a valid marker of urine concentration in population-based and CKD cohorts. The UCI can provide an estimate of urine concentration when no other measurement is available, but should be used only in subjects with normal renal function.</p

    PowerPoint Slides for: Rationale and Design of a Clinical Trial Investigating Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

    No full text
    <p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In TEMPO 3:4, the vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan slowed kidney growth and function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients with relatively preserved kidney function. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Prospective, phase 3b, multi-center, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of tolvaptan in ADPKD patients with late stage 2 to early stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary endpoint was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change from pre-treatment baseline to post-treatment follow-up. Secondary endpoints included annualized eGFR slope, incidence of ADPKD complications, and overall and hepatic safety profiles. Participants were 18-55 year-old ADPKD patients with baseline eGFR ≥25 and ≤65 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or 56-65 year-old with eGFR ≥25 and ≤44 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and evidence of eGFR decline >2.0 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> per year. Daily split doses of tolvaptan were titrated to tolerance (30/15, 45/15, 60/30, or 90/30 mg) and maintained for 12 months, after an 8-week pre-randomization period to screen out subjects unable to tolerate at least 60/30 mg for 3 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 1,495 subjects who entered the tolvaptan titration period, 125 (8.4%) discontinued the study before randomization. One thousand three hundred seventy subjects (684 tolvaptan, 686 placebo) from 213 centers across 21 countries were randomized. Baseline demographics were well balanced across treatment arms. Information collected during the study included eGFR, survey scores (PKD history and outcome), adverse events, vital signs, hematology, urinalysis, and serum chemistry tests. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: An Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy (REPRISE) determines whether tolvaptan administered over 1 year exhibits disease-modifying properties in ADPKD patients with late stage 2 to early stage 4 CKD, which provides an important therapeutic advancement for this difficult-to-treat disease.</p

    Supplementary Material for: Cystic Gene Dosage Influences Kidney Lesions After Nephron Reduction

    No full text
    <p>Cystic kidney disease is characterized by the progressive development of multiple fluid-filled cysts. Cysts can be acquired, or they may appear during development or in postnatal life due to specific gene defects and lead to renal failure. The most frequent form of this disease is the inherited polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Experimental models of PKD showed that an increase of cellular proliferation and apoptosis as well as defects in apico-basal and planar cell polarity or cilia play a critical role in cyst development. However, little is known about the mechanisms and the mediators involved in acquired cystic kidney diseases (ACKD). In this study, we used the nephron reduction as a model to study the mechanisms underlying cyst development in ACKD. We found that tubular dilations after nephron reduction recapitulated most of the morphological features of ACKD. The development of tubular dilations was associated with a dramatic increase of cell proliferation. In contrast, the apico-basal polarity and cilia did not seem to be affected. Interestingly, polycystin 1 and fibrocystin were markedly increased and polycystin 2 was decreased in cells lining the dilated tubules, whereas the expression of several other cystic genes did not change. More importantly, <i>Pkd1</i> haploinsufficiency accelerated the development of tubular dilations after nephron reduction, a phenotype that was associated to a further increase of cell proliferation. These data were relevant to humans ACKD, as cystic genes expression and the rate of cell proliferation were also increased. In conclusion, our study suggests that the nephron reduction can be considered a suitable model to study ACKD and that dosage of genes involved in PKD is also important in ACKD.</p
    corecore