Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a noninvasive technology that allows visualization of the colon without requiring sedation and air insufflation. A second-generation colon capsule endoscopy system (PillCam Colon 2) (CCE-2) was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection compared with the first-generation system. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, multicenter trial including 8 European sites. PATIENTS: This study involved 117 patients (mean age 60 years). Data from 109 patients were analyzed. INTERVENTION: CCE-2 was prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy as the criterion standard for the detection of colorectal polyps that are >/=6 mm or masses in a cohort of patients at average or increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Colonoscopy was independently performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion or on the next day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CCE-2 sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients with polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm were assessed. Capsule-positive but colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false positive. Capsule excretion rate, level of bowel preparation, and rate of adverse events also were assessed. RESULTS: Per-patient CCE-2 sensitivity for polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm was 84% and 88%, with specificities of 64% and 95%, respectively. All 3 invasive carcinomas were detected by CCE-2. The capsule excretion rate was 88% within 10 hours. Overall colon cleanliness for CCE-2 was adequate in 81% of patients. LIMITATIONS: Not unblinding the CCE-2 results at colonoscopy; heterogenous patient population; nonconsecutive patients. CONCLUSION: In this European, multicenter study, CCE-2 appeared to have a high sensitivity for the detection of clinically relevant polypoid lesions, and it might be considered an adequate tool for colorectal imaging

Duodenal mucosal resurfacing: proof-of-concept, procedural development, and initial implementation in the clinical setting

Background and Aims: We aimed to develop duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR), a minimally invasive upper endoscopic hydrothermal ablation procedure, to treat insulin-resistant metabolic diseases. Methods: We completed a sham-controlled, rodent proof-of-concept study and longitudinal safety study in pigs to demonstrate feasibility to test DMR in humans. Subsequently, the DMR procedure was implemented in an open-label first-in-human (FIH) study of safety and efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Results: In rats, duodenal abrasion reduced hyperglycemia by 59 mg/dL on average, compared with no change from baseline in the sham treatment arm (P < .05). In pigs, the balloon catheter successfully and safely delivered hydrothermal ablation to the duodenal mucosa and superficial submucosa. Complete mucosal healing was demonstrated by week 6. In the FIH study, hydrothermal ablation was successfully administered with no evidence of perforation, pancreatitis, or hemorrhage. Duodenal biopsy specimens obtained 3 months postprocedure demonstrated full mucosal regrowth. No inflammation was observed, and there was minimal-to-mild collagen banding deposition observed in a proportion of ablation site biopsy specimens with no evidence of fibrotic scarring. Glycemic and hepatic measures improved through 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: DMR shows potential as an endoscopic intervention that improves glycemic and hepatic parameters in patients with T2D. Further mechanistic and clinical studies are underway to further explore DMR as a treatment for metabolic disease

Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) on the management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence