Variability of aerosol delivery via spacer devices in young asthmatic children in daily life

Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) are widely used together with spacers for the treatment of asthma in children. However, the variability of daily medication dose for pMDI/spacer combinations is not known. Electrostatic charge is a potential source of dose variability. Metal spacers have no static charge. This study assessed and compared within-subject variability of aerosol delivery of metal and plastic spacers. This was a randomized, crossover study in children with stable asthma aged 1-4 (group I, n=17) and 5-8 (group II, n=16) yrs. In both groups the amount of drug delivered to the mouth by a metal spacer (Nebuchamber) and one of two plastic (polycarbonate) spacers, i.e. Babyhaler in group I and Volumatic in group II was measured. The metal and plastic spacers were tested at home in a randomized order for 7 days each, using budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.). Aerosol was collected on a filter positioned between spacer and facemask or mouth. Budesonide on the filter was assessed by high performance liquid chromatography. The mean filter dose for each child (mean+/-SD) during the 7 days was expressed as a percentage of the nominal dose. Within-subject variability was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV). Mean filter dose in group I was 41.7+/-10.1% for Nebuchamber and 26.0+/-4.0% for Babyhaler (p<0.001). Mean filter dose in group II was 50.2+/-9.2% for Nebuchamber and 19.4+/-7.2% for Volumatic (p<0.001). Mean CV in group I was 34% for Nebuchamber and 37% for Babyhaler (p=0.44). Mean CV in group II was 23% for Nebuchamber and 34% for Volumatic (p=0.003). There was substantial within-subject dose variability in aerosol delivery in children using a pMDI/spacer at home. This variability was lower for the metal than for the plastic spacer in children 5-8 yrs of age. The dose delivered to the mouth was about two-fold higher fo

Methacholine responsiveness using the raised volume forced expiration technique in infants

Infant lung function can be assessed with the tidal volume ''squeeze'' technique or, over an extended volume range, with the newer raised volume forced expiration technique (RVFET). We assessed methacholine responsiveness in 11 infants, measuring both maximal expiratory flow at functional residual capacity (Vmax,FRC) with the tidal volume technique, and forced expiratory volume/time (FEVt) with RVFET. We used a standard methodology for the former. FEVt was measured by inflating the infant's lungs to 20 cm H2O and forcing expiration using a jacket setup to transmit a pressure of 20 cm H2O to the airway. Lung function was measured at baseline and after methacholine inhalations, increasing from 0.1 g/L to 10 g/L in half log dosage increments (DI). The provocative concentrations (PC) of methacholine leading to a 40% fall in Vmax,FRC and a 15 or 20% fall in FEVt were calculated. The mean provocative concentration of methacholine required to produce a 40% fall in Vmax,FRC was less than that required to produce a 20% fall in FEV0.5 by 0.39 DI (95% CII -0.60 to 1.38) and less than that required to produce a 20% fall in FEV0.75 by 0.42 DI (95%, CI, -0.54 to 1.39). Similarly, the provocative concentration of methacholine required to produce a 40% fall in Vmax,FRC was less than that required to produce a 15% fall in FEV0.5 by 0.14 DI (95% CI, -0.99 to 1.28) or a 15% fall in FEV0.75 by 0.13 DI (95% CI, -0.80 to 1.08), but the differences were small and not significant. Despite these differences the agreement between the two methods was good, and bronchoconstriction was not attenuated by the forced inspiration delivered by the raised volume maneuver. We conclude that the raised volume forced expiration technique is able to detect methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction