6 research outputs found
Median IC<sub>50s</sub> for CQ, AQ, LU and MQ per Year during 2008–2011.
<p>Medians were calculated in Graphpad prism Version 5. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal Wallis H test.</p
Frequency of <i>Pfcrt</i> 72-76 haplotype and <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP.
<p>A. <i>Pfcrt</i> 72-76 haplotype frequency per year; B. <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP frequency per year. Statistical significance was determined by Chi-square.</p
Combined Pfcrt 76/Pfmdr1 86 haplotype vs. medians.
<p>Medians were calculated in Graphpad prism Version 5. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal Wallis H test. Comparisons were done using Dunns Multiple comparison test.</p
<i>Pfcrt</i> K76T SNP compared against drug IC<sub>50</sub> (in nM).
<p>A. Comparison of <i>Pfcrt</i> K76T SNP against CQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; B. Comparison of <i>Pfcrt</i> K76T SNP against AQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; C. Comparison of <i>Pfcrt</i> K76T SNP against MQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; D. Comparison of <i>Pfcrt</i> K76T SNP against LU IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year. Median values are shown. *indicates data is significant.</p
Pearson product-moment correlation for CQ, AQ, MQ and LU.
<p>Correlation was determined in Graphpad prism Version 5 based on IC<sub>50</sub> values for each pair of drugs per isolate.</p
<i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP compared against drug IC<sub>50</sub>s (in nM).
<p>A. Comparison of <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP against CQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; B. Comparison of <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP against AQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; C. Comparison of <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP against MQ IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year; D. Comparison of <i>Pfmdr1</i> N86Y SNP against LU IC<sub>50</sub> stratified by year. Median values are shown. *indicates data is significant.</p