Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE: To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options. RESULTS: A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines

Synergistic effects of various Her inhibitors in combination with IGF-1R, C-MET and Src targeting agents in breast cancer cell lines

Introduction: Overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 has been reported in around 25% of human breast cancers, usually indicating a poor prognosis. As a result, HER2 has become a popular target for therapy. However, despite recent advances in HER2 targeted therapy, many patients still experience primary and secondary resistance to such treatments. It is therefore important to understand the underlying mechanism of resistance and to develop more effective therapeutic interventions for breast cancer. Methods: The sensitivity of a panel of seven breast cancer cell lines to treatment with various types HER-family inhibitors alone, or in combination with a selection of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or chemotherapeutic agents was determined using the Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. Receptor expression, cell-cycle distribution, cell signalling and cell migration were determined using flow cytometry, Western blot and Incucyte Zoom Live-Cell Analysis System respectively. Results: Overall, breast cancer cells were more sensitive to treatment with the irreversible pan-HER family inhibitors, particularly afatinib and neratinib, than treatment with the first-generation reversible inhibitors. Of three HER-2 overexpressing cell lines in this panel, SKBr3 and BT474 were highly sensitive to treatment with HER-family inhibitors (IC50s as low as 3 nM), while MDA-MB-453 was relatively resistant (lowest IC50 = 0.11 μM). When the HER-family inhibitors were combined with other agents such as NVP-AEW541 (an IGF-1R inhibitor), dasatinib (a Src inhibitor) or crizotinib (a c-Met/ALK inhibitor), such combination produced synergistic effects in some of the cell lines examined. Interestingly, co-targeting of Src and HER-family members in MDA-MB-453 cells led to synergistic growth inhibition, suggesting the importance of Src in mediating resistance to HER2-targeting agents. Finally, treatment with the irreversible HER family blockers and dasatinib were also most effective at inhibiting the migration of breast cancer cells. Conclusion: We concluded that the irreversible inhibitors of HER-family members are generally more effective at inhibiting growth, downstream signalling and migration compared with reversible inhibitors, and that combining HER-family inhibitors with other TKIs such as dasatinib may have therapeutic advantages in certain breast cancer subtypes and warrants further investigation

Biomarkers of angiogenesis and their role in the development of VEGF inhibitors

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been confirmed as an important therapeutic target in randomised clinical trials in multiple disease settings. However, the extent to which individual patients benefit from VEGF inhibitors is unclear. If we are to optimise the use of these drugs or develop combination regimens that build on this efficacy, it is critical to identify those patients who are likely to benefit, particularly as these agents can be toxic and are expensive. To this end, biomarkers have been evaluated in tissue, in circulation and by imaging. Consistent drug-induced increases in plasma VEGF-A and blood pressure, as well as reductions in soluble VEGF-R2 and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters have been reported. In some clinical trials, biomarker changes were statistically significant and associated with clinical end points, but there is considerable heterogeneity between studies that are to some extent attributable to methodological issues. On the basis of observations with these biomarkers, it is now appropriate to conduct detailed prospective studies to define a suite of predictive, pharmacodynamic and surrogate response biomarkers that identify those patients most likely to benefit from and monitor their response to this novel class of drugs

Present and future evolution of advanced breast cancer therapy

Although the introduction of novel therapies and drug combinations has improved the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer, the disease remains incurable. Increased knowledge of the biology and the molecular alterations in breast cancer has facilitated the design of targeted therapies. These agents include receptor and nonreceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (epidermal growth factor receptor family), intracellular signaling pathways (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin) angiogenesis inhibitors and agents that interfere with DNA repair (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors). In the present review, we present the most promising studies of these new targeted therapies and novel combinations of targeted therapies with cytotoxic agents