Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon?

BACKGROUND: The volume of total knee arthroplasties, including revisions, in young patients is expected to rise. The objective of this study was to compare the reasons for revision and re-revision total knee arthroplasties between younger and older patients, to determine the survivorship of revision total knee arthroplasties, and to identify risk factors associated with failure of revision in patients fifty years of age or younger. METHODS: Perioperative data were collected for all total knee arthroplasty revisions performed from August 1999 to December 2009. A cohort of eighty-four patients who were fifty years of age or younger and a cohort of eighty-four patients who were sixty to seventy years of age were matched for the date of surgery, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The etiology of failure of the index total knee arthroplasty and all subsequent revision total knee arthroplasties was determined. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the timing of the primary failure and the survivorship of revision knee procedures. Finally, multivariate Cox regression was used to calculate risk ratios for the influence of age, sex, BMI, and the reason for the initial revision on survival of the revision total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: The most common reason for the initial revision was aseptic loosening (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 19% to 38%) in the younger cohort and infection (30%; 95% CI = 21% to 40%) in the older cohort. Of the twenty-five second revisions in younger patients, 32% (95% CI = 17% to 52%) were for infection, whereas 50% (95% CI = 32% to 68%) of the twenty-six second revisions in the older cohort were for infection. Cumulative six-year survival rates were 71.0% (95% CI = 60.7% to 83.0%) and 66.1% (95% CI = 54.5% to 80.2%) for revisions in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Infection and a BMI of ≥40 kg/m2 posed the greatest risk of failure of revision procedures, with risk ratios of 2.731 (p = 0.006) and 2.934 (p = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The survivorship of knee revisions in younger patients is a cause of concern, and the higher rates of aseptic failure in these patients may be related to unique demands that they place on the reconstruction. Improvement in implant fixation and treatment of infection when these patients undergo revision total knee arthroplasty is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Laboratory-Reported Normal Value Ranges Should Not Be Used to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical laboratories offer several multipurpose tests, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are not intended to diagnose any specific disease but are used by clinicians in multiple fields. The results and laboratory interpretation (normal/abnormal) of these multipurpose tests are based on laboratory-reported normal thresholds, which vary across clinical laboratories. In 2018, the International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (2018 ICM) provided a gold-standard definition to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) which included many multipurpose laboratory tests, along with thresholds optimized to diagnose PJI. The discrepancy between laboratory-reported normal thresholds and 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized test thresholds has never been studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the existing variation in laboratory-reported normal thresholds for tests commonly used to diagnose PJI and evaluate the potential diagnostic impact of using laboratory-reported normal thresholds instead of 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds. METHODS: Clinical laboratories (N=85) were surveyed to determine the laboratory-reported units of measure and normal thresholds for common multipurpose tests to diagnose PJI, including the ESR, CRP, D-dimer, synovial fluid white blood cells (SF-WBC), and polymorphonuclear cell percent (SF-PMN%). The variability of units of measure and normal thresholds for each test was then assessed among the 85 included clinical laboratories. A representative dataset from patients awaiting a revision arthroplasty was used to determine the clinical significance of the existing discrepancy between laboratory-reported normal test interpretations and 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized test interpretations. RESULTS: Two units of measure for the CRP and six units of measure for the D-dimer were observed, with only 59% of laboratories reporting the CRP in terms of mg/L and only 16% reporting the D-dimer in ng/ml, as needed to utilize the 2018 ICM definition of PJI. Across clinical laboratories surveyed, the mean laboratory-reported normal thresholds for the ESR (20 mm/h), CRP (7.69 mg/L), D-dimer (500 ng/mL), SF-WBC (5 cells/uL), and SF-PMN% (25%) were substantially lower than the 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds of 30 mm/h, 10 mg/L, 860 ng/mL, 3,000 cells/uL, and 70%, respectively. Interpretation of test results from a representative PJI dataset using each laboratory\u27s normal test thresholds yielded mean false-positive rates of 14% (ESR), 18% (CRP), 42% (D-dimer), 93% (SF-WBC), and 36% (SF-PMN%) versus the ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds. CONCLUSION: When reporting the results for multipurpose laboratory tests, such as the ESR, CRP, D-dimer, SF-WBC, and SF-PMN%, clinical laboratories utilize laboratory-reported units of measure and normal thresholds that are not intended to diagnose PJI, and therefore may not match the 2018 ICM recommendations. Our findings reveal that laboratory-reported normal thresholds for these multipurpose tests are well below the 2018 ICM recommendations to diagnose PJI. Clinical reliance on laboratory-reported results and interpretations, instead of strict use of the 2018 ICM-recommended units and PJI-optimized thresholds, may lead to false-positive interpretation of multipurpose laboratory tests

Not All Patients Need Supervised Physical Therapy After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although postoperative physical therapy (PT) has long been considered essential to successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recovery, recent literature has suggested that unsupervised home exercise regimens may offer similar benefits to formal supervised sessions. We aimed to compare objectively measured physical function and subjective patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between primary TKA patients who received formal supervised physical therapy sessions and those who received unsupervised home exercise regimens after discharge. Six electronic databases were queried to identify randomized controlled trials comparing supervised physical therapy to unsupervised home exercise regimens in primary TKA patients after discharge. Outcomes of interest included change from baseline in objective measures (knee flexion range of motion (ROM), lower extremity strength, and aerobic capacity) and PROs (physical function and quality of life scores). These outcomes were subdivided into short-term (surgery; closest data point to three months is used if multiple measurements were made in this time period) and long-term (≥6 months from surgery; closest data point to 12 months is used if multiple measurements were made in this time period) assessments. A total of 1,884 cases performed in 11 studies were included in this review. There were no significant differences between cohorts with regard to short-term knee flexion ROM (p = 0.7), lower extremity strength (p = 0.6), or patient-reported quality of life (p = 0.5), as well as long-term knee flexion ROM (p = 0.7), patient-reported quality of life (p = 0.2), or patient-reported physical outcome scores (p = 0.3). A small difference in short-term patient-reported physical outcomes was observed in favor of the supervised cohort (standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.6); I2 = 82%; p = 0.04). Formal supervised physical therapy regimens do not confer clinically significant benefits over unsupervised home exercise regimens following primary TKA. The routine use of supervised physical therapy after discharge may not be warranted. Further study is needed to determine the subset of patients that may benefit from supervised care

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty Needs Its Own Diagnosis Related Group Facility Reimbursement Code

Introduction: Conversion from a prior surgery to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a more technically difficult procedure than primary TKA and is associated with worse short-term outcomes and increased complication and readmission rates, despite being undifferentiated under the current bundled payment model. The aim of this study was to determine differences in facility costs between primary TKA and conversion TKA, which we hypothesize are significant, to ensure providers are not penalized for treatment and high-risk patients have the same access to care. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary TKA at two hospitals within Rothman Orthopaedic Institute from 2015-2017, comparing itemized facility costs between primary and conversion TKA patients. Secondary endpoints included length of stay, discharge disposition, and additional implants used. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for increased facility costs, the need for additional implants, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Results: Of 2447 primary TKA procedures, 678 (27.7%) underwent conversion to TKA, which was associated with greater implant costs ($3424.25 vs. 3272.29, P\u3c0.0001), preoperative personnel costs ($1269.89 vs. $1217.72, p\u3c0.0001), and total costs ($6859.16 vs. $6703.55, p=0.0015). Presence of prior surgical hardware was a risk factor for increased implant costs ($501.1 increase, p=0.0024) and total cost ($501.4 increase, p=0.0024). Discussion: Conversion TKA is associated with significantly greater facility costs than primary TKA, thus confirming our hypothesis, and should be adjusted for in alternative payment models to ensure these patients do not encounter difficulties in accessing quality orthopaedic care

Catastrophic Femoral Head-Stem Trunnion Dissociation Secondary to Corrosion.

BACKGROUND: Modular femoral heads provide procedural enhancement by allowing accurate restoration of hip offset and limb-length equalization. However, corrosion may lead to adverse local tissue reactions. Severe trunnion corrosion can also lead to femoral head dissociation and catastrophic implant failure following primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We describe 5 cases, from our institution, in which the femoral head became dissociated from the femoral stem trunnion secondary to severe corrosion. Possible causes are evaluated. RESULTS: Demographic commonalities among the 5 patients included a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m(2) and male sex. All femoral heads were made of cobalt-chromium alloy and were larger-diameter implants (≥36 mm). Four of the 5 patients had a femoral head that increased the neck length above the default on a so-called standard head and 3 of the 5 had a stem with a 127° neck-shaft angle. CONCLUSIONS: Although dissociation of the femoral head from the femoral trunnion following total hip arthroplasty is exceedingly rare, the prevalence may increase with longer follow-up. The dissociation is likely related to multiple factors, including a BMI of ≥30 kg/m(2), male sex, and corrosion resulting from the use of a larger metal head with a neck length of greater than the default and a stem with high offset. It is critical that surgeons be able to recognize this mode of implant failure and appropriately prepare to remove the femoral component during revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Aspirin May Be Adequate for Venous Thromboembolic Event Prophylaxis after Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: The optimal prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown.(1) Current studies focus on primary arthroplasty and there are little to no data on the ideal prophylaxis for VTE following revision arthroplasty.(2) Revision surgery, due to its complexity, longer operative time, higher risk of bleeding and infection diff­ers from primary arthroplasty.(3) The objective of this study was to evaluate whether aspirin, known to be e­ffective for prevention of VTE after primary arthroplasty, is also e­ffective against such events following revision THA and TKA

Unsupervised Home Exercises Versus Formal Physical Therapy After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Historically, postoperative exercise and physical therapy (PT) have been viewed as crucial to a successful outcome following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess differences in both short- and long-term objective and self-reported measures between primary THA patients with formal supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised home exercises after discharge. A search was conducted of six electronic databases from inception to December 14, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing changes from baseline in lower extremity strength (LES), aerobic capacity, and self-reported physical function and quality of life (QoL) between supervised and unsupervised physical therapy/exercise regimens following primary THA. Outcomes were separated into short-term (surgery, closest to 3 months) and long-term (≥6 months from surgery, closest to 12 months) measures. Meta-analyses were performed when possible and reported in standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Seven studies (N=398) were included for review. No significant differences were observed with regard to lower extremity strength (p=0.85), aerobic capacity (p=0.98), or short-term quality of life scores (p=0.18). Although patients in supervised physical therapy demonstrated improved short-term self-reported outcomes compared to those performing unsupervised exercises, this was represented by a small effect size (SMD 0.23 [95% CI, 0.02-0.44]; p=0.04). No differences were observed between groups regarding long-term lower extremity strength (p=0.24), physical outcome scores (p=0.37), or quality of life (p=0.14). The routine use of supervised physical therapy may not provide any clinically significant benefit over unsupervised exercises following primary THA. These results suggest that providers should reconsider the routine use of supervised physical therapy after discharge

Nationwide Results of Microorganism Antigen Testing as a Component of Preoperative Synovial Fluid Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antigen immunoassays to detect synovial fluid (SF) microorganisms have recently been made available for clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of an SF microorganism antigen immunoassay detection (MID) panel, evaluate the panel\u27s capability to detect microorganisms in the setting of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and determine diagnostic predictive values of the MID panel for PJI. METHODS: This study included 67,441 SF samples obtained from a hip or knee arthroplasty, from 2,365 institutions across the United States, submitted to 1 laboratory for diagnostic testing. All data were prospectively compiled and then were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative SF data were used to classify each specimen by the International Consensus Meeting (2018 ICM) definition of PJI: 49,991 were not infected, 5,071 were inconclusive, and 12,379 were infected. The MID panel, including immunoassay tests to detect Staphylococcus, Candida, and Enterococcus, was evaluated to determine its diagnostic performance. RESULTS: The MID panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.2% for infected samples that yielded positive cultures for target microorganisms (Staphylococcus, Candida, or Enterococcus). Among infected samples yielding positive cultures for their respective microorganism, individual immunoassay test sensitivity was 93.0% for Staphylococcus, 92.3% for Candida, and 97.2% for Enterococcus. The specificity of the MID panel for samples that were not infected was 98.4%, yielding a false-positive rate of 1.6%. The MID panel detected microorganisms among 49.3% of SF culture-negative infected samples. For PJI as a diagnosis, the positive predictive value of the MID panel was 91.7% and the negative predictive value was 93.8%. Among MID-positive PJIs, 16.2% yielded a discordant cultured organism instead of that detected by the antigen test. CONCLUSIONS: SF microorganism antigen testing provides a timely adjunct method to detect microorganisms in the preoperative SF aspirate, yielding a low false-positive rate and enabling the detection of a microorganism in nearly one-half of SF culture-negative PJIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications.

Proximal tibial metaphyseal bone loss compromises the alignment and fixation of components during revision total knee arthroplasty. In massive, segmental defects with loss of collateral ligamentous support and lack of bone to support the use of prosthetic augments or metaphyseal cones or sleeves, a hinged proximal tibial replacement or a so-called megaprosthesis should be available. While proximal tibial replacement is the reconstructive method of choice in the setting of bone tumor resection, applications in non-oncologic joint arthroplasty are rare and may offer an opportunity for limb salvage in dire clinical scenarios with massive proximal tibial bone loss. This report reviews 6 cases of proximal tibial replacement

Treatment of knee prosthesis infections: evaluation of 15 patients over a 5-year period

Our objective was to evaluate different treatment alternatives for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection and to compare outcomes depending on adherence to a current treatment algorithm. All patients treated for a first episode of TKA infection between January 2000 and July 2005 were included. Patient records were reviewed and data were extracted retrospectively. Fifteen patients were followed up for a median of 25 months. The cure rate in patients with two-stage exchange of knee prosthesis was higher than in patients who had débridement without implant removal (100 vs 37%, p = 0.03). Cure rates were not different between these two surgical approaches in ten patients who were treated according to a current treatment algorithm. Success rates for treatment of TKA infections varied considerably with the treatment strategy chosen. Our results support the use of existing algorithms to select patients who are eligible for débridement with retention of the prosthesis or need two-stage exchange of knee implants