12 research outputs found
Long-term experimental warming and nutrient additions increase productivity in tall deciduous shrub tundra
© The Author(s), 2014. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Ecosphere 5 (2014): art72, doi:10.1890/ES13-00281.1.Warming Arctic temperatures can drive changes in vegetation structure and function directly by stimulating plant growth or indirectly by stimulating microbial decomposition of organic matter and releasing more nutrients for plant uptake and growth. The arctic biome is currently increasing in deciduous shrub cover and this increase is expected to continue with climate warming. However, little is known how current deciduous shrub communities will respond to future climate induced warming and nutrient increase. We examined the plant and ecosystem response to a long-term (18 years) nutrient addition and warming experiment in an Alaskan arctic tall deciduous shrub tundra ecosystem to understand controls over plant productivity and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage in shrub tundra ecosystems. In addition, we used a meta-analysis approach to compare the treatment effect size for aboveground biomass among seven long-term studies conducted across multiple plant community types within the Arctic. We found that biomass, productivity, and aboveground N pools increased with nutrient additions and warming, while species diversity decreased. Both nutrient additions and warming caused the dominant functional group, deciduous shrubs, to increase biomass and proportional C and N allocation to aboveground stems but decreased allocation to belowground stems. For all response variables except soil C and N pools, effects of nutrients plus warming were largest. Soil C and N pools were highly variable and we could not detect any response to the treatments. The biomass response to warming and fertilization in tall deciduous shrub tundra was greater than moist acidic and moist non-acidic tundra and more similar to the biomass response of wet sedge tundra. Our data suggest that in a warmer and more nutrient-rich Arctic, tall deciduous shrub tundra will have greater total deciduous shrub biomass and a higher proportion of woody tissue that has a longer residence time, with a lower proportion of C and N allocated to belowground stems.This research was supported by NSF
grants DEB-0516041, DEB-0516509 and the Arctic
LTER (DEB-0423385)
Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra
© 2008 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 2.5. The definitive version was published in Journal of Ecology 96 (2008): 713-726, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01378.x.Plant communities in natural ecosystems are changing and species are being lost due to anthropogenic impacts including global warming and increasing nitrogen (N) deposition. We removed dominant species, combinations of species and entire functional types from Alaskan tussock tundra, in the presence and absence of fertilization, to examine the effects of non-random species loss on plant interactions and ecosystem functioning.
After 6 years, growth of remaining species had compensated for biomass loss due to removal in all treatments except the combined removal of moss, Betula nana and Ledum palustre (MBL), which removed the most biomass. Total vascular plant production returned to control levels in all removal treatments, including MBL. Inorganic soil nutrient availability, as indexed by resins, returned to control levels in all unfertilized removal treatments, except MBL.
Although biomass compensation occurred, the species that provided most of the compensating biomass in any given treatment were not from the same functional type (growth form) as the removed species. This provides empirical evidence that functional types based on effect traits are not the same as functional types based on response to perturbation. Calculations based on redistributing N from the removed species to the remaining species suggested that dominant species from other functional types contributed most of the compensatory biomass.
Fertilization did not increase total plant community biomass, because increases in graminoid and deciduous shrub biomass were offset by decreases in evergreen shrub, moss and lichen biomass. Fertilization greatly increased inorganic soil nutrient availability.
In fertilized removal treatments, deciduous shrubs and graminoids grew more than expected based on their performance in the fertilized intact community, while evergreen shrubs, mosses and lichens all grew less than expected. Deciduous shrubs performed better than graminoids when B. nana was present, but not when it had been removed.
Synthesis. Terrestrial ecosystem response to warmer temperatures and greater nutrient availability in the Arctic may result in vegetative stable-states dominated by either deciduous shrubs or graminoids. The current relative abundance of these dominant growth forms may serve as a predictor for future vegetation composition.This work was supported by NSF grants DEB-0213130, DEB-0516509, OPP-0623364, DEB-981022 and DEB-0423385, and by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN 2015 which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (GEO-0452325). Open access to this publication was partially supported by the Berkeley Research Impact Initiative Program
Appendix C. Initial litter quality of leaves and stems of Betula nana and Salix pulchra collected across the shrub gradient sites.
Initial litter quality of leaves and stems of Betula nana and Salix pulchra collected across the shrub gradient sites
Appendix A. Aboveground net primary productivity for each species within each shrub community and their corresponding k values.
Aboveground net primary productivity for each species within each shrub community and their corresponding k values
Evaluating Post-Fire Vegetation Recovery in Cajander Larch Forests in Northeastern Siberia Using UAV Derived Vegetation Indices
The ability to monitor post-fire ecological responses and associated vegetation cover change is crucial to understanding how boreal forests respond to wildfire under changing climate conditions. Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer an affordable means of monitoring post-fire vegetation recovery for boreal ecosystems where field campaigns are spatially limited, and available satellite data are reduced by short growing seasons and frequent cloud cover. UAV data could be particularly useful across data-limited regions like the Cajander larch (Larix cajanderi Mayr.) forests of northeastern Siberia that are susceptible to amplified climate warming. Cajander larch forests require fire for regeneration but are also slow to accumulate biomass post-fire; thus, tall shrubs and other understory vegetation including grasses, mosses, and lichens dominate for several decades post-fire. Here we aim to evaluate the ability of two vegetation indices, one based on the visible spectrum (GCC; Green Chromatic Coordinate) and one using multispectral data (NDVI; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), to predict field-based vegetation measures collected across post-fire landscapes of high-latitude Cajander larch forests. GCC and NDVI showed stronger linkages with each other at coarser spatial resolutions e.g., pixel aggregated means with 3-m, 5-m and 10-m radii compared to finer resolutions (e.g., 1-m or less). NDVI was a stronger predictor of aboveground carbon biomass and tree basal area than GCC. NDVI showed a stronger decline with increasing distance from the unburned edge into the burned forest. Our results show NDVI tended to be a stronger predictor of some field-based measures and while GCC showed similar relationships with the data, it was generally a weaker predictor of field-based measures for this region. Our findings show distinguishable edge effects and differentiation between burned and unburned forests several decades post-fire, which corresponds to the relatively slow accumulation of biomass for this ecosystem post-fire. These findings show the utility of UAV data for NDVI in this region as a tool for quantifying and monitoring the post-fire vegetation dynamics in Cajander larch forests
Above-ground litter (both loose and attached to living biomass) accumulated in removal treatments, and soil inorganic N availability in removal treatments, as measured by accumulation on ion exchange resins
(a) Mass of litter, (b) mass of N in litter, (c) the mass of N as , (d) the mass of N as . Note the logarithmic scale on the -axis in panels (c) and (d). Abbreviations for removal treatments as in legend to . Error bars indicate 1 SE among blocks ( = 6).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra"</p><p></p><p>The Journal of Ecology 2008;96(4):713-726.</p><p>Published online Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2438444.</p><p>© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society</p
Biomass, production and N content of remaining plants by growth form (mosses, lichens, forbs, evergreen shrubs, deciduous shrubs and graminoids) in 2003, after 6 years of experimental removal and fertilization
(a) Biomass excluding roots, (b) above-ground net primary production of vascular plants, (c) mass of N in living biomass, (d) mass of N in above-ground net primary production of vascular plants. Treatment abbreviations: C = control (no removal, unfertilized), F = fertilized control (no removal), other abbreviations as in legend to . An F following a removal treatment abbreviation indicates that the treatment was fertilized. Error bars indicate 1 SE for the total community biomass, vascular plant production and N mass in production and biomass (all growth forms combined) among blocks ( = 6).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Plant functional types do not predict biomass responses to removal and fertilization in Alaskan tussock tundra"</p><p></p><p>The Journal of Ecology 2008;96(4):713-726.</p><p>Published online Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2438444.</p><p>© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society</p