2,348 research outputs found

    Dynamical zeta functions and Kummer congruences

    Get PDF
    We establish a connection between the coefficients of Artin-Mazur zeta-functions and Kummer congruences. This allows to settle positively the question of the existence of a map T such that the number of fixed points of the n-th iterate of T is equal to the absolute value of the 2n-th Euler number. Also we solve a problem of Gabcke related to the coefficients of Riemann-Siegel formula.Comment: 12 pages, AMS-LaTe

    Algorithms for determining integer complexity

    Full text link
    We present three algorithms to compute the complexity n\Vert n\Vert of all natural numbers nN n\le N. The first of them is a brute force algorithm, computing all these complexities in time O(N2)O(N^2) and space O(Nlog2N)O(N\log^2 N). The main problem of this algorithm is the time needed for the computation. In 2008 there appeared three independent solutions to this problem: V. V. Srinivas and B. R. Shankar [11], M. N. Fuller [7], and J. Arias de Reyna and J. van de Lune [3]. All three are very similar. Only [11] gives an estimation of the performance of its algorithm, proving that the algorithm computes the complexities in time O(N1+β)O(N^{1+\beta}), where 1+β=log3/log21.5849631+\beta =\log3/\log2\approx1.584963. The other two algorithms, presented in [7] and [3], were very similar but both superior to the one in [11]. In Section 2 we present a version of these algorithms and in Section 4 it is shown that they run in time O(Nα)O(N^\alpha) and space O(NloglogN)O(N\log\log N). (Here α=1.230175\alpha = 1.230175). In Section 2 we present the algorithm of [7] and [3]. The main advantage of this algorithm with respect to that in [11] is the definition of kMax in Section 2.7. This explains the difference in performance from O(N1+β)O(N^{1+\beta}) to O(Nα)O(N^\alpha). In Section 3 we present a detailed description a space-improved algorithm of Fuller and in Section 5 we prove that it runs in time O(Nα)O(N^\alpha) and space O(N(1+β)/2loglogN)O(N^{(1+\beta)/2}\log\log N), where α=1.230175\alpha=1.230175 and (1+β)/20.792481(1+\beta)/2\approx0.792481.Comment: 21 pages. v2: We improved the computations to get a better bound for $\alpha

    The n-th prime asymptotically

    Get PDF
    A new derivation of the classic asymptotic expansion of the n-th prime is presented. A fast algorithm for the computation of its terms is also given, which will be an improvement of that by Salvy (1994). Realistic bounds for the error with \li^{-1}(n), after having retained the first m terms, for 1m111\le m\le 11, are given. Finally, assuming the Riemann Hypothesis, we give estimations of the best possible r3r_3 such that, for nr3n\ge r_3, we have pn>s3(n)p_n> s_3(n) where s3(n)s_3(n) is the sum of the first four terms of the asymptotic expansion
    corecore