Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a systematic review

Background: Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) among cancer patients has gained an increasing importance and is now a key determinant of anticancer treatments’ value. HR-QoL has been assessed in trials testing cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in breast cancer (BC), using various questionnaires at different timepoints. HR-QoL reports from BC patients treated with CDK4/6i in the real-world setting are also available. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature, searching for full-length articles, and selected conference abstracts reporting data on HR-QoL in BC patients at any stage and of any molecular subtype treated with abemaciclib, palbociclib or ribociclib. Results: A total of 533 full-length articles and 143 abstracts were retrieved. After screening for eligibility, 38 records were included (31 clinical trials; 7 real-world reports). Assessment methods were heterogeneous across studies in terms of questionnaires, evaluation timepoints and endpoints. Overall, adding CDK4/6i to endocrine therapy did not worsen patients’ HR-QoL, with a positive trend towards pain improvement. Gastrointestinal scores (diarrhea, nausea and appetite loss) statistically favored the control arm among metastatic BC patients receiving abemaciclib, whereas they were superimposable in the early setting. The combination of palbociclib and endocrine therapy showed similar HR-QoL outcomes compared with endocrine therapy alone, but determined better scores compared with chemotherapy. HR-QoL was specifically assessed in premenopausal patients treated with ribociclib, showing similar scores compared with postmenopausal patients. Conclusions: Despite methodological heterogeneity does not allow a proper comparison, HR-QoL was generally maintained with CDK4/6i. However, differences between abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib exist and mainly rely on the distinct safety profiles of the compounds. These differences should be acknowledged and taken into account in the clinical practice

Controversial topics in metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer: Guiding treatment by a modified Delphi approach

The treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy has recently emerged as the most relevant therapeutic strategy. However, in routine clinical practice, the best therapeutic approach in patients with comorbidities at early relapsing or ab initio metastatic disease, PI3KCA mutation, is still debated among oncologists. Given these areas of uncertainty, we conducted a Delphi survey to describe and confront the level of agreement or disagreement between clinicians working in referral vs local spoke oncological hospitals and summarize a consensus on these debated topics. In total, 56 items were drafted using the Nominal Group Technique and used for the Delphi Survey. A total of 46 clinicians participated in the survey. Overall, the consensus threshold among all participants was reached in 46/56 items (82%), and Delphi Survey results showed a high level of consensus. For the 10 items (18%) that did not reach the consensus threshold, possible explanations considering differences in clinical practice and recent findings from literature are provided in the Discussion. Outcomes from the present survey may help guide treatment in multiple comorbidities, early recurring and ab initio metastatic disease, and PI3KCA mutation, where evidence from randomized trials and level 1 evidence is currently missing

\u201cA randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer\u201d

The sequential doxorubicin \u2192 CMF (CMF = cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF 7 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin 7 4 cycles followed by CMF 7 6 cycles (A \u2192 CMF); (c) CMF 7 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen 7 2 years (CMF \u2192 GT); and (d) doxorubicin 7 4 cycles followed by CMF 7 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen 7 2 years (A \u2192 CMF \u2192 GT). The study used a 2 7 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A 7 CMF or arms a + c vs b + d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a + b vs c + d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A \u2192 CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) = 0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556-0.986; P = 0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.764; 95% CI: 0.489-1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.555-0.987; P = 0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.54-1.32). A \u2192 CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients. \ua9 2005 Cancer Research UK

New steps on an old path: Novel estrogen receptor inhibitors in breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling represents the main driver of tumor growth and survival in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Thus, endocrine therapy (ET) alone or in combination with targeted agents constitutes the mainstay of the treatment for this BC subtype. Despite its efficacy, intrinsic or acquired resistance to ET occurs in a large proportion of cases, mainly due to aberrant activation of ER signaling (i.e. through ligand-independent ER activation, in the presence of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene aberration or ER protein phosphorylation) and/or the upregulation of escape pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Therefore, the development of new ER pathway targeting agents remains essential to delay and overcome ET resistance, enhance treatment efficacy and tolerability, and ultimately prolong patient survival and improve their quality of life. Several novel ER targeting agents are currently under investigation. Among these, the oral selective ER degraders (SERDs) represent the pharmacological class at the most advanced stage of development and promise to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium of HR+ BC in the next few years, as they showed promising results in several clinical trials, either as single ET agents or in combination with targeted therapies. In this manuscript, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical development of novel ER targeting agents, reporting the most up-to-date evidence on oral SERDs and other compounds, including new selective ER modulators (SERMs), ER proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTACs), selective ER covalent antagonists (SERCAs), complete ER antagonists (CERANs), selective human ER partial agonists (ShERPAs). Furthermore, we discuss the potential implications of introducing these novel treatment strategies in the evolving and complex therapeutic scenario of HR+ BC

New steps on an old path: Novel estrogen receptor inhibitors in breast cancer

: Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling represents the main driver of tumor growth and survival in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Thus, endocrine therapy (ET) alone or in combination with targeted agents constitutes the mainstay of the treatment for this BC subtype. Despite its efficacy, intrinsic or acquired resistance to ET occurs in a large proportion of cases, mainly due to aberrant activation of ER signaling (i.e. through ligand-independent ER activation, in the presence of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene aberration or ER protein phosphorylation) and/or the upregulation of escape pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Therefore, the development of new ER pathway targeting agents remains essential to delay and overcome ET resistance, enhance treatment efficacy and tolerability, and ultimately prolong patient survival and improve their quality of life. Several novel ER targeting agents are currently under investigation. Among these, the oral selective ER degraders (SERDs) represent the pharmacological class at the most advanced stage of development and promise to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium of HR+ BC in the next few years, as they showed promising results in several clinical trials, either as single ET agents or in combination with targeted therapies. In this manuscript, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the clinical development of novel ER targeting agents, reporting the most up-to-date evidence on oral SERDs and other compounds, including new selective ER modulators (SERMs), ER proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTACs), selective ER covalent antagonists (SERCAs), complete ER antagonists (CERANs), selective human ER partial agonists (ShERPAs). Furthermore, we discuss the potential implications of introducing these novel treatment strategies in the evolving and complex therapeutic scenario of HR+ BC

Linking land use inventories to biodiversity impact assessment methods

There is generally a mismatch in the land use classification of life cycle inventory (LCI) databases and life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods. This mismatch can hinder the proper assessment of land use impacts on biodiversity. To facilitate such assessments, we matched the land use classes of two global LCIA methods to five widely used LCI databases, one LCI nomenclature, and one multi-regional input-output database. In unclear cases, we assumed the worst case. Assumptions were especially necessary for unspecified land use intensity classes. We conclude with recommendations for LCI database and LCIA method developers.Industrial Ecolog

Breaking barriers in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) – Unleashing the power of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a novel class of molecules composed of a recombinant monoclonal antibody targeted to a specific cell surface antigen, conjugated to a cytotoxic agent through a cleavable or non-cleavable synthetic linker. The rationale behind the development of ADCs is to overcome the limitations of conventional chemotherapy, such as the narrow therapeutic window and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. ADCs had already revolutionized the treatment algorithm of HER2-positive breast cancer. Currently, emergent non-HER2 targeted ADCs are gaining momentum, with special focus on triple-negative disease therapeutic landscape. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an ADC consisting of a humanized monoclonal antibody hRS7 targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2), linked to the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 by a hydrolysable linker. It currently stands as the only non-HER2 targeted ADC that already received approval for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in patients who had received two or more prior systemic therapies, with at least one for advanced disease. The purpose of these review is to analyze the available evidence regarding ADCs in TNBC, alongside with providing an overview on the ongoing and future research horizons in this field