Gestione della terapia adiuvante con mitotane nei pazienti affetti da carcinoma corticosurrenalico

n/

Problemi interpretativi del dosaggio delle metanefrine

n/

Stimulated Expression of CXCL12 in Adrenocortical Carcinoma by the PPARgamma Ligand Rosiglitazone Impairs Cancer Progression

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis when metastatic and scarce treatment options in the advanced stages. In solid tumors, the chemokine CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in the metastatic process. We demonstrated that the human adrenocortex expressed CXCL12 and its cognate receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, not only in physiological conditions, but also in ACC, where the receptors' expression was higher and the CXCL12 expression was lower than in the physiological conditions. In a small pilot cohort of 22 ACC patients, CXCL12 negatively correlated with tumor size, stage, Weiss score, necrosis, and mitotic activity. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, the CXCL12 tumor expression significantly predicted disease-free, progression-free, and overall survival. In vitro treatment of the primary ACC H295R and of the metastatic MUC-1 cell line with the PPARγ-ligand rosiglitazone (RGZ) dose-dependently reduced proliferation, resulting in a significant increase in CXCL12 and a decrease in its receptors in the H295R cells only, with no effect on the MUC-1 levels. In ACC mouse xenografts, tumor growth was inhibited by the RGZ treatment before tumor development (prevention-setting) and once the tumor had grown (therapeutic-setting), similarly to mitotane (MTT). This inhibition was associated with a significant suppression of the tumor CXCR4/CXCR7 and the stimulation of human CXCL12 expression. Tumor growth correlated inversely with CXCL12 and positively with CXCR4 expression, suggesting that local CXCL12 may impair the primary tumor cell response to the ligand gradient that may contribute to driving the tumor progression. These findings indicate that CXCL12/CXCR4 may constitute a potential target for anti-cancer agents such as rosiglitazone in the treatment of ACC

Levothyroxine-induced serum free thyroxine response following radioactive iodine administration in patients thyroidectomized for differentiated thyroid cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Purpose Patients undergoing thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) may require 131-radioactive iodine (RAI) administration for remnant ablation or disease treatment. After ingestion, RAI resides within the gastrointestinal tract potentially leading to mucosal damage and abnormalities in the absorption of levothyroxine (LT4). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether serum FT4 peak, induced by a LT4 challenge, changes according to the LT4 formulation (solid or liquid) in both RAI and non-RAI-treated DTC patients. Methods This was a monocentric controlled clinical trial, with a parallel two-groups (1:1) randomization of sequence of LT4 formulation. Patients received 200 mcg LT4 orally administered at 08:00 h, in both solid and liquid formulation, at one-week interval, at baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months from RAI administration. At each time-point, circulating FT4 was evaluated both before LT4 assumption as well as after 1 and 3 h. FT4 increments were evaluated as area under the curve response (AUC). Analogous protocol with the same time-intervals was followed for non-RAI patients. Results The trial included 29 consecutive DTC patients, nineteen of whom were submitted to RAI. In RAI subjects, we observed an overall significant reduction in serum FT4 increments with the most relevant decrease at the 1-month time-point, (FT4 AUC: 4.46 +/- 0.72 (M +/- SD) vs 4.07 +/- 0.63 in baseline vs 1-month, P = 0.001) without any difference between the two LT4 formulations. No difference in serum FT4 AUC was found in non-RAI subjects. Conclusion LT4-induced serum FT4 responses are reduced following RAI administration in thyroidectomized DTC patients

Novel Germline PHD2 Variant in a Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, but in the Absence of Polycythemia

Background: Pheochromocytoma (Pheo) and paraganglioma (PGL) are rare tumors, mostly resulting from pathogenic variants of predisposing genes, with a genetic contribution that now stands at around 70%. Germline variants account for approximately 40%, while the remaining 30% is attributable to somatic variants. Objective: This study aimed to describe a new PHD2 (EGLN1) variant in a patient affected by metastatic Pheo and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) without polycythemia and to emphasize the need to adopt a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Methods: Genetic analysis was carried out by NGS. This analysis was initially performed using a panel of genes known for tumor predisposition (EGLN1, EPAS1, FH, KIF1Bβ, MAX, NF1, RET, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, TMEM127, and VHL), followed initially by SNP-CGH array, to exclude the presence of the pathogenic Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and subsequently by whole exome sequencing (WES) comparative sequence analysis of the DNA extracted from tumor fragments and peripheral blood. Results: We found a novel germline PHD2 (EGLN1) gene variant, c.153G>A, p.W51*, in a patient affected by metastatic Pheo and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the absence of polycythemia. Conclusions: According to the latest guidelines, it is mandatory to perform genetic analysis in all Pheo/PGL cases regardless of phenotype. In patients with metastatic disease and no evidence of polycythemia, we propose testing for PHD2 (EGLN1) gene variants. A possible correlation between PHD2 (EGLN1) pathogenic variants and CML clinical course should be considered

SDHx and Non-Chromaffin Tumors: A Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumor Occurring in a Young Man with Germline SDHB Mutation

Background: Mutations in genes encoding one of the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) are involved in pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and paraganglioma (PGL) development. Over the last few years, such mutations have also been associated with non-chromaffin tumors. However, immunohistochemistry (IHC) on the tumor tissue and a study on the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) aimed at demonstrating the pathogenic role of SDHx genes have only been employed in a few cases. Case report: We describe the case of a 19-year-old Caucasian man with a germline SDHB mutation, who presented with acne vulgaris resistant to medical treatment. His follow-up for chromaffin tumors was negative, while hormonal tests revealed suppressed gonadotropins with testosterone in the upper range of normality and elevated β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG). At the whole-body enhanced CT scan, a mediastinal lesion suggestive of a germ cell tumor (GCT) was detected. 18FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography) imaging showed low glucose metabolism at the mediastinal site. Surgical removal of the mass was uneventful. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of GCT consisting of cystic teratoma (95%) and seminoma (5%). IHC for SDHB showed normal protein expression, and genetic analysis of the tumor tissue revealed the absence of SDHB LOH. Normalization of the hormonal tests and acne attenuation were achieved after surgery. Conclusion: We report an incidental association of a germinal SDHB mutation and mediastinal GCT in a young Caucasian man. Our paper highlights the importance of IHC and genetic analysis in confirming the etiologic role of SDHx genes in nonchromaffin tumors, thus excluding incidental associations