Appendix B. A table of climate, landform, and soil characteristics of landscapes within northern Wisconsin.

A table of climate, landform, and soil characteristics of landscapes within northern Wisconsin

Appendix A. Forest types used to compare the U.S. Public Land Survey (mid-1800s), Wisconsin Land Economic Inventory (1930s), and U. S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (2000s).

Forest types used to compare the U.S. Public Land Survey (mid-1800s), Wisconsin Land Economic Inventory (1930s), and U. S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (2000s)

Appendix D. Results of statistical analysis of change in relative dominance (percentage of basal area) by forest type among all three time periods.

Results of statistical analysis of change in relative dominance (percentage of basal area) by forest type among all three time periods

Appendix B. List of Latin names of species in Appendix A.

List of Latin names of species in Appendix A

Appendix C. Spatial variability of change in relative dominance (percentage of basal area) by forest type from the mid-1800s to 1930s, 1930s to 2000s, and mid-1800s to 2000s.

Spatial variability of change in relative dominance (percentage of basal area) by forest type from the mid-1800s to 1930s, 1930s to 2000s, and mid-1800s to 2000s

Land use/cover of the Lake States, USA (MN, Minnesota; WI, Wisconsin; MI, Michigan) derived from the 2012 Cropland Data Layer.

<p>Land-cover categories were simplified to depict the major categories analyzed here.</p

Environmental Quality Integrated Climate (EPIC) model simulated biomass and ethanol production potential on open lands in the Lake States in 2008 and 2013 [23].

<p>Results are also presented as a fraction of the Energy Independency and Security (EISA) act of 2007 mandate for ethanol production targets for 2022.</p

Breakdown of the individual Cropland Data Layer (CDL) classes that comprise the land groups used in this analysis.

<p>Breakdown of the individual Cropland Data Layer (CDL) classes that comprise the land groups used in this analysis.</p

Increase in area of land cover classes as a result of a loss of open lands between 2008 and 2013 in each of the Lake States.

<p>Increase in area of land cover classes as a result of a loss of open lands between 2008 and 2013 in each of the Lake States.</p

Percentage of open land loss within each site-quality class for each year starting from 2009.

<p>Percentage of open land loss within each site-quality class for each year starting from 2009.</p