The Effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on Post-Transplant Mortality An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the relationship between pre-transplant ventricular assist device (VAD) support and mortality after heart transplantation.BackgroundIncreasingly, VADs are being used to bridge patients to heart transplantation. The effect of these devices on post-transplant mortality is unclear.MethodsPatients 18 years or older who underwent first-time, single-organ heart transplantation in the U.S. between 1995 and 2004 were included in the analyses. This study compared 1,433 patients bridged with intracorporeal and 448 patients bridged with extracorporeal VADs with 9,455 United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 patients not bridged with a VAD with respect to post-transplant mortality. Because the proportional hazards assumption was not met, hazard ratios (HRs) for different time periods were estimated.ResultsIntracorporeal VADs were associated with an HR of 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.43; p = 0.03) for mortality in the first 6 months after transplant and an HR of 1.99 (95% CI: 1.44 to 2.75; p < 0.0001) beyond 5 years. Between 6 months and 5 years, the HRs were not significantly different from 1. Extracorporeal VADs were associated with an HR of 1.91 (95% CI: 1.53 to 2.37; p < 0.0001) for mortality in the first 6 months and an HR of 2.93 (95% CI: 1.19 to 7.25; p = 0.02) beyond 5 years. The HRs were not significantly different from 1 between 6 months and 5 years, except for an HR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.91; p = 0.04) between 24 and 36 months.ConclusionsExtracorporeal VADs are associated with higher mortality within 6 months and again beyond 5 years after transplantation. Intracorporeal VADs are associated with a small increase in mortality in the first 6 months and a clinically significant increase in mortality beyond 5 years. These data do not provide evidence supporting VAD implantation in stable United Network for Organ Sharing status I patients awaiting heart transplantation

Linking Student Interests to Science Curricula

Explicit networking helps undergraduates get the most out of the diverse curriculum available at a large university.published or submitted for publicationis peer reviewe

Outcomes in Patients With Symptomatic Cerebrovascular Disease Undergoing Heart Transplantation

ObjectivesWe sought to determine outcomes in patients with and without symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (sCVD) undergoing heart transplantation. Second, we sought to determine factors associated with stroke in the perioperative period after heart transplantation.BackgroundsCVD is considered a relative contraindication to heart transplantation. Despite this concern, outcomes in patients with sCVD undergoing heart transplantation have not been well defined.MethodsData on all single-organ heart transplants performed in the United States between April 1994 and December 2006 in patients age 40 years or older were analyzed. Survival analysis was performed to examine the effect of sCVD on the combined outcome of stroke or death, stroke, death, and functional decline, adjusting for potential confounding variables over long-term follow-up. In a separate analysis, predictors of perioperative stroke during the transplant-related hospitalization were examined using multiple logistic regression.ResultsThere were 1,078 patients with and 16,765 patients without sCVD. The annualized rates of stroke or death (11.5% vs. 7.8%; p < 0.001), stroke (4% vs. 1.4%; p < 0.001), death (8.9% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001), and functional decline (3.7% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.002) were higher in patients with sCVD than in patients without sCVD. In multivariable analysis, patients with sCVD were at increased risk of stroke or death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17 to 1.42), stroke (HR: 2.24; 95% CI: 2.02 to 2.87), and functional decline (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.42) compared with those without sCVD. We did not identify a higher risk of death in patients with sCVD (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.20), compared with those without sCVD. sCVD, ventilator use, and ventricular assist device use were the most important predictors of perioperative stroke.ConclusionsPatients with sCVD are at an increased risk of stroke and functional decline after transplantation independent of other variables, but not death, during long-term follow-up. These results should assist programs in making informed decisions in patients with sCVD who are undergoing evaluation for heart transplantation

Survival after cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant is a treatment option for selected patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the prevalence, clinical profile, and outcome of this subgroup of HCM patients are uncertain. Therefore, we sought to determine the occurrence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of HCM patients who underwent cardiac transplantation in the United States during a 15-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and survival outcomes of 26 706 adult (age \u3e/=18 years), heart-only transplant recipients between January 1990 and December 2004 were acquired from the United Network of Organ Sharing Registry. Pretransplant diagnoses were classified as follows: HCM (n=303, 1%) and non-HCM (26 403, 99%), comprising 3 patient subgroups: (1) ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=14 308, 54%), (2) dilated cardiomyopathy (n=11 760, 44%), and (3) restrictive cardiomyopathy (n=335, 1%). Study follow-up began at the time of heart transplant and was 76+/-44 months (mean+/-SD) among survivors. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall transplant survival for HCM patients was 85%, 75%, and 61%, respectively, with a trend toward greater survival compared with that of non-HCM transplant patients (82%, 70%, and 49%, respectively; log-rank test, P=0.05). However, propensity-matched, covariate-adjusted, Cox regression model analysis showed better survival over time (P\u3c0.01) among the HCM patients. When HCM posttransplant survival was compared with that in each of the non-HCM patient subgroups, HCM patients had more favorable survival than did those transplanted for ischemic cardiomyopathy (P=0.02). In contrast, HCM posttransplant survival did not differ from that of patients transplanted for restrictive (P=0.08) or dilated (P=0.25) cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: HCM patients compose a small subset (1%) of the overall population of patients who undergo heart transplantation in the United States. Nonetheless, survival after transplant among HCM patients is comparable to that of patients transplanted for non-HCM cardiovascular diseases, with possible enhanced survival over time

Influence of donor cocaine use on outcome after cardiac transplantation: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry

Heart transplantation from donors with a history of cocaine abuse remains controversial. Therefore, we examined the consequence of donor cocaine-use history on all-cause mortality and the development of coronary artery disease after heart transplantation. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry we identified 9,217 first-time heart-only adult transplant recipients between January 1999 and December 2003, and then divided this cohort into sub-groups based on the reported history of donor cocaine use. Multivariate analysis revealed no difference in mortality or development of coronary artery disease at 1 and 5 years between transplant recipients who received an organ from donors with a history of cocaine use when compared with donors having no history of cocaine use