Unadjusted and adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI) for albuminuria.

<p>Unadjusted and adjusted Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI) for albuminuria.</p

Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) comparing albuminuria among consumers of 2+ vs. 0–1 sugary soft drinks per day, stratified by body mass index (BMI) category.

<p>Trend line shows a quadratic model fit to the aORs; vertical lines represent 95% Confidence Intervals. The aORs are adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, and poverty status, but not BMI. BMI is used only as a stratification variable. Figure excludes subjects with BMI<17.5 kg/m² (n = 61).</p

Proportion consuming 2+ sugary sodas (cells) by quartile of energy intake (rows) and body mass index (BMI) category (columns).

<p>Note: “Column differences” χ² p-value assess whether sugary soda consumption differs by level of caloric consumption within each BMI category. “Row differences” χ² p-value assess whether sugary soda consumption differs by BMI category within each level of energy intake.</p

Prevalence of albuminuria among NHANES 1999–2004 non-diabetics age 20 and over, unadjusted and adjusted for age, according to sugary soft drink consumption.

<p>Prevalence of albuminuria among NHANES 1999–2004 non-diabetics age 20 and over, unadjusted and adjusted for age, according to sugary soft drink consumption.</p

Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) comparing albuminuria among consumers of 2+ vs. 0–1 sugary soft drinks per day, according to interaction with body mass index (BMI).

<p>Adjusted for diet soda consumption, age, race, ethnicity, poverty status, BMI, and BMI-squared.</p

Distribution of attributes, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004, overall and by albuminuria status.

<p>P values use t-test for differences in means, and Wald chi-square test for proportions.</p>*<p>Note that values in the table are weighted to take into account the complex survey design; however, the counts of number of subjects with (n = 1326) and without albuminuria (n = 8032) are not weighted for the survey design.</p>†<p>Triglyceride levels available only for the subset (n = 4457) with fasting morning blood draw.</p

U.S. trends in total sugar availability, High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) availability, soft drink consumption, and incident diabetic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over time.

<p>Data on sweetener availability from USDA <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003431#pone.0003431-USDA1" target="_blank">[38]</a>; soft drink consumption from Nielsen and Popkin <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003431#pone.0003431-Nielsen1" target="_blank">[8]</a>; and incident diabetic ESRD from the United States Renal Data System <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003431#pone.0003431-USRDS1" target="_blank">[54]</a>.</p

Probability of changing ego’s playing active sports score in the next time step, based on ego’s and average alters’ current active sports score.

<p>The playing active sports score is the frequency in the past week: 0 = not at all; 1 = 1 or 2 times; 2 = 3 or 4 times; 3 = 5 or more times. Egos may increase by one level, decrease by one level, or stay at the same level.</p

Behavioral influence on network choice for Jefferson and Sunshine High, parameters and (95% confidence intervals).

<p>Network change parameters are adjusted for structural (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0039795#pone-0039795-t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>) and behavior change parameters (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0039795#pone-0039795-t005" target="_blank">Table 5</a>).</p>1<p>Positive values for attractiveness indicate that egos generally prefer to become or maintain friendships with alters who have high levels of the BMI or behavior; negative values indicate a disinclination to keep or maintain friendships with individuals with high levels of the BMI or behavior.</p>2<p>Sociability indicates that egos with high levels of BMI or the behavior prefer to have more friends.</p>3<p>Similarity is the measure of homophily on BMI or the behavior. Positive values indicate a preference for alters whose values are similar to the ego’s.</p

Structural influences on network for Jefferson and Sunshine High, parameters and (95% confidence intervals).¹

1<p>Parameters are the weights actors place on various network configurations. They are the contributions to the objective function. The 95% confidence intervals quantify the precision of the estimates a score function method.</p>2<p>The basic rate parameter for friendship controls how often actors have the opportunity to change their network (add, keep, or drop a friend). Higher values indicate more network changes.</p>3<p>The outdegree parameter is the weight placed on having a friendship tie with <i>any</i> member of the social network, irrespective of the alter’s characteristics.</p>4<p>The reciprocity parameter is the weight an actor places on reciprocating alters’ friendship nominations.</p>5<p>The transitive triplets parameter is the weight an actor places on naming friends who are also named by the actor’s friend.</p>6<p>Positive values of “same” and “similarity” measures are the effects of homophily on these attributes.</p