Balancing authority, deference and trust across the public-private divide in health care: Tuberculosis health visitors in western Maharashtra, India

While concepts such as 'partnership' are central to the terminology of private-public mix (PPM), little attention has been paid to how social relations are negotiated among the diverse actors responsible for implementing these inter-sectoral arrangements. India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) has used intermediary agents to facilitate the involvement of private providers in the expansion of Directly Observed Therapy, Short-Course (DOTS). We examine the roles of tuberculosis health visitors (TB HVs) in mediating working relationships among private providers, programme staff and patients that underpin a PPM-DOTS launched by the RNTCP in western Maharashtra. In addition to observations and informal interactions with the programme and participating health providers, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with senior programme officers and eight TB HVs. Framed by a political discourse of clinical governance, working relationships within the PPM are structured by the pluralistic context, social and professional hierarchies and paternalism of health care in India. TB HVs are at the nexus of these relationships, yet remain undervalued partly because accountability is measured through technical rather than social outcomes of the 'partnership'. Close attention to the dynamics of power relations in working practices within the health system can improve accountability and sustainability of partnerships. 2014 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.sch_iih9pub3557pub

Private providers and HIV testing in Pune, India: challenges and opportunities.

We explored HIV testing practices of private medical providers in an urban Indian setting in Pune, western India. 215 private practitioners (PPs) and 36 persons-in-charge of private laboratories were interviewed in separate surveys. 77% of PPs had prescribed HIV tests and 94% of laboratories had performed HIV tests, or collected samples for HIV testing. Among those providers who had prescribed/performed tests, practices which violated national policy guidelines were found to be common. 55% of PPs and 94% of laboratories had not prescribed/performed confirmatory HIV tests, 82% of PPs had conducted routine HIV screening tests, 53% of PPs and 47% of laboratories had never counselled patients before testing, and 39% of laboratories reported breaching confidentiality of test results. PPs' knowledge about HIV tests was also inadequate, with 28% of PPs who had prescribed HIV tests being unable to name the tests they had advised. Prolific HIV testing in the private medical sector is accompanied by inappropriate practices and inadequate knowledge, reflecting deficiencies in the implementation of policy guidelines. The perspectives and needs of private providers, the major source of health care in India, need to be acknowledged. Supportive and regulatory mechanisms can be used to involve private providers in the delivery of better HIV testing services

Private practitioners' communications with patients around HIV testing in Pune, India.

Unlike any other disease so far, the 'exceptional' nature of HIV/AIDS has prompted debate about the necessity, but also the challenges, of regulating practitioner-patient communication around HIV testing. In India, the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) has adopted the guidelines of the World Health Organization with regard to HIV testing and counselling, yet the extent to which these guidelines are fully understood or followed by the vast private medical sector is unknown. This paper examines the gaps between policy and practice in communications around HIV testing in the private sector and aims to inform a bottom-up approach to policy development that is grounded in actual processes of health care provision. Drawing on 27 in-depth interviews conducted with private medical practitioners managing HIV patients in the city of Pune, we looked specifically at practitioners' reported communications with patients prior to an HIV test, during and following disclosure of the test result. Among these practitioners, informed consent is rare and pre-test communication is prescriptive rather than shared. Confidentiality of the patient is often breached during disclosure, as family members are drawn into the process without consulting the patient. While non-adherence to guidelines is a matter of concern, practitioners' communication practices in this setting must be understood in the given social and legal context of the patient-practitioner relationship in India. Communication with their patients is strongly influenced by practitioners' perceptions of their own roles and relationships with patients, perceived characteristics of the patient population, limitations in knowledge and skills, moral values as well as perceptions of legal guidelines and patient rights. We suggest that policy guidelines around patient-practitioner communication need to take sufficient cognizance of existing practices, cultures and the realities of care provision in the private sector. Patients themselves need to be empowered in order to grasp the importance and implications of HIV testing and counselling

Managing uncertainty around HIV/AIDS in an urban setting: private medical providers and their patients in Pune, India.

Changing epidemiological patterns and the advent of new rapid diagnostic technologies and therapies have created considerable uncertainty for providers working in HIV. In India, the demand for HIV care is increasingly being met by private practitioners (PPs), yet little is known about how they deal with the challenges of managing HIV patients. To explore HIV management practices in the private medical sector, a survey was conducted with 215PPs in Pune, India, followed by in-depth interviews focusing on the social context of practice among a sub-set of 27PPs. Drawing primarily on interview data, this paper illustrates a number of uncertainties that underlie the reported actions of providers in a competitive medical market. PPs perceive HIV as a 'new' and challenging disease for which they lack adequate knowledge and skills. Combined with the perceived high cost and complexity of antiretroviral treatment, preconceptions about HIV patients' social, financial and mental capacity lead to highly individualistic management practices. While these fall short of clinical 'best practice' guidelines, they reflect adaptive responses to the wider uncertainties surrounding HIV care in urban India. By highlighting contextual issues in PPs' management of HIV patients, the paper suggests the need to explicitly acknowledge the social, moral and economic bases of uncertainty beyond the clinical setting