9 research outputs found

    Type of dynamic index (<i>DI</i>) and relative WICs.

    No full text
    <p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042128#pone-0042128-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> for labels. Different interpretations of the “recent times” and “former times” concepts offer an evaluation of emerging trends and stabilised trends of keywords occurrences.</p

    Conceptual model of the proposed approach.

    No full text
    <p>The meta-knowledge area, where scientific knowledge is combined with general knowledge (at the top) is the basis of decisions that produce impacts on the environment (in the centre), which in turn contribute to systems evolution (at the bottom). This process produces new scientific knowledge.</p

    List of selected web contexts, and relative WICs used to perform searches.

    No full text
    <p>The last two columns differentiate the following typologies of indicators: R = relational; D = dynamic; G = global level; N = national level; C = specific cultural contexts.</p

    Radar graphs of 7 selected keywords according to the following web-profile indicators: WOS.09–10%; WOS.V1; WOS.V2; WGY.en%; WGB.en%; WGT.us.V1 (see <b>Table 2</b> for labels).

    No full text
    <p>The interpretation criteria are: (c1) relevance in the scientific context; (c2) current relevance in the world; (c3) relevance in the individual sphere; (c4) emerging and stabilised trends of dynamic variation. For each WIC, relative percent values over the total of 24 keywords are reported.</p

    Results of the relational indices (<i>RI</i>) and dynamic indices (<i>DI</i>) (See Tables 3 and 4 for labels and indices structure).

    No full text
    <p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042128#s3" target="_blank">Results</a> of the relational indices (<i>RI</i>) and dynamic indices (<i>DI</i>) (See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042128#pone-0042128-t003" target="_blank">Tables 3</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042128#pone-0042128-t004" target="_blank">4</a> for labels and indices structure).</p

    Results of data collection from selected WICs for the scientific web, global web, social web and web news contexts (see Table 2 for WIC labels).

    No full text
    <p>Raw data were transformed into percentage of occurrences of a given keyword over the total number of occurrences obtained from all the 24 keywords. Bold character style indicates the most popular keywords for each WIC; underlined style indicates the least popular keywords.</p

    Type of relational index (<i>RI</i>) and selected pairs of WICs considered for the comparison.

    No full text
    <p>See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0042128#pone-0042128-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> for labels.</p
    corecore